That is what people need to understand about this trade.
They are too focused on the one-dimensional aspect of "Is Norris good or bad at hockey, if he is good, why trade him?"
This trade was bigger than Norris. They didn't trade the player, they traded the circumstance. There are two major factors that go into this trade.
- Staios is moving out as much of the old core/lineup as possible to change the culture of the team.
(My opinion, this isn't something he has openly stated, but you can follow his trades along with the rumour that he supposedly listened on every single asset the team had when he took over to gauge their value.)
- The contract of Norris presents a major liability for a small market Canadian team.
(Norris is owed 9.5M per season in real dollars for the next few seasons. He has 6 years left on his contract. Three career shoulder surgeries. He missed around half the possible games he could have played over the last three seasons. Has already missed almost 1 in 6 games this season, despite being "healthy". The Senators as a small market Canadian team may not be in a position to deal with that kind of liability.
Buffalo got the better player right now, but in the context of the Senators lineup this is as close to a lateral move as they can get. This isn't selling off Norris for a 1st round pick and calling it a day.
The Senators are also very asset poor because under Melnyk, they weren't able to rebuild the same way that other teams like Montreal, and Chicago have. They also burned major assets to try and build excitement around the team with the Debrincat and Chychrun trades. Getting a 2026 2nd Round pick seems pedestrian, but it was massive for the Senators and combined with the cap savings may have enabled them to go out and get Zetterlund.