You could make the same argument for any team that is not selling. Adding players early is usually cheaper. It will likely add points to your standings and help your playoff seeding. But, it comes at an opportunity cost as do most things. First, if you don’t know you are a true contender, you may be wasting assets on players you wouldn’t otherwise need in an effort to climb the standings. Second, you pull time away from the rookie type players that rely a lot on those first half minutes they get when other teams are still finding their legs. Sometimes you uncover gems by giving them those early season extra minutes. Third, you allow your leadership group to grasp control of the room so when new players come in, they have to fit into the rom. Unless you are specifically trying to acquire leadership, that dichotomy works much better.
Kingston is not proven capable as a contender; therefore, anything they spend on that goes beyond icing a responsible lineup is wasted assets. Ice a responsible roster. LEt them play and prove capable. IF capable, add the components required to be top of the Conference. I believe that is the approach of the Generals. I think it is the correct approach.
I am fine with the Fronts adding OA’s if they fill obvious gaps and the prices are relatively low. The Guindon addition is an example of a decent acquisition. Maybe a slight but too steep of a price for this early in the season but that is more a matter of opinion. If they want to add another OA at a similar price, so be it. No issues with that. But, if they go out and acquire a high priced 19 year old before they prove capable of winning the Conference, I think ti is premature and irresponsible.