Post-Game Talk: On the back of a Chris Tanev OT goal, Vancouver defeats Minnesota in the play-in

Billy Kvcmu

Registered User
Dec 5, 2014
28,550
17,318
West Vancouver
The main issue is that they are built to kick some ass and ragdoll teams. Much like Washington. Even if we managed to get through the Blues, we would likely come out limping.

It would definitely be the ultimate test, that's for sure.
The counter argument
I don’t remember the last time we beat Dallas
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dave Ayers

Ozone

Registered User
Jan 19, 2013
15,234
5,383
I like Stecher’s heart too, but there’s a reason why he only played 9 minutes. His lack of skill defaults him to a defensive role, but he’s so light that heavy hockey is a challenge for him.
I hear ya, but I think the 'default' has hurt his offensive confidence..
I could be wrong, but I saw a 'sky's the limit' offensive potential at the start in his play and attitude..

Or maybe that was the cold medication..

I always felt his potential was somewhat squashed after a handful of games here.
 

Wayward Son

Registered User
May 3, 2013
9,282
8,731
Vancouver
The counter argument
I don’t remember the last time we beat Dallas
200.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ginger Papa

VancouverJagger

Not trying to fit in
Feb 26, 2017
2,235
2,079
Vancouver - Coal Harbour
VJ, you are overlooking what he actually did on the ice in order to support your feeling about this player. Myers sucked.

He was markedly worse in this series than he was in the regular season. It wasn't even close. Did you need more plays where forwards covered for his mistakes to make it obvious? He was so poor in the neutral and defensive zones. He relied almost completely on his strength and not his brain.

'Solid'... He was the furthest thing from it. We are watching different games. I almost feel like posting his every mistake in the GDT would wake people up to what he is actually doing on the ice.

The last 3 games I didn't see a ton of high quality scoring chances for the wild. Even today I thought we did a pretty good job of shutting them down (granted I missed portions of the game while playing babysitter).

I feel like Myers tends to get noticed for all the wrong reasons..........even when he's doing a decent amount of right. Hard not to be focused on his parade to the penalty box. I bet if you ask the wild they would say he's not super fun to play against.
 

NorCalhockey

Registered User
Jan 6, 2017
3,256
3,440
I don't think anyones mentioned Hughes' ice time but he played almost half the game.

His 27:31 on ice was more than anyone else on the Canucks and only slightly behind Brodin and Dumba (29:01 and 27:47).

Pretty clear who our number 1 dman is, and he's a rookie.
Yeah, it’s amazing that Hughes is getting thrown out there like a seasoned vet, getting lots of minutes and tough opposition matchups. Bravo QH43!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ginger Papa

Josepho

i want the bartkowski thread back
Jan 1, 2015
15,061
8,822
British Columbia
Anyone else think Juolevi showed well, albeit in very limited minutes. He was poised with the puck, good at holding the line in the offensive zone.

He's obviously had some physical limitations over the years but you can definitely see his brain is still there. That fake dump-in was a really interesting play that I don't think a lot of players would think of doing.

I'm still not particularly optimistic, but him turning into a player would help out our defence majorly. He's looked better than I expected.
 

LickTheEnvelope

Weird time to be a Canucks fan 2024
Dec 16, 2008
39,203
6,213
Sidney, formerly Vancouver
Is that how the picks from 16-31 will go? The next 8 pick from 16-23 will be the losers of round 1 based off regular points? Then 24-27 will be those who lose in round 2?

Well 2-9 are set in stone.

The next 8 will be teams that are eliminated in this pre-playoff round.

So that's 10-17...

Then there has been a lot of upsets so the Nucks are higher up in the points for teams in the 1st round. Hawks, Yotes, Flames, Habs would all be below if they all get knocked out in the 1st round.

If odds go as we expect the Nucks pick would be around 20th now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ginger Papa

AzNightmare

Unregistered User
May 11, 2011
1,815
1,553
Great series with incredible learning opportunities for every game:

-Learnt what it feels like to get completely shut out, every scoring opportunity needs to be fought and earned
-Learnt what it feels like to be passive with a big lead, that it's never safe until the final buzzer
-Learnt how to play a solid defensive game and shut down the other team
-Learnt how to not give in when losing, and keep fighting the whole way
 

HockeyWooot

Registered User
Jan 28, 2020
2,600
2,266
He's obviously had some physical limitations over the years but you can definitely see his brain is still there. That fake dump-in was a really interesting play that I don't think a lot of players would think of doing.

I'm still not particularly optimistic, but him turning into a player would help out our defence majorly. He's looked better than I expected.

For sure. I’ve accepted he won’t justify the 6OA selection, but am still hopeful he will become an NHL defensemen. I certainly don’t expect it, but I won’t rule it out either.

From what I’ve seen, he does have a strong transition game. Even if he is just a reliable low event player but with a strong transition game, I’ll take that. It’s such an important part of the modern game.

The Canucks adding Hughes has single handedly shot up their team quality of transition from 2nd last to middle of the pack. To have another young dman increase this further would be invaluable.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad