You don't think that the IOC is not taking a position that inclusion is more important than safety/competitive fairness concerns?
Not sure if this question is intentionally written in a confusing way
No, I don't think that allowing a woman to compete with other women in a boxing tournament is putting "inclusion" over safety.
I have no problem with people recognizing that sex/gender are more complex than just male/female and participating in a productive conversation to decide if there should be any changes to the rules for the next Olympics. There's no reason the governing bodies, scientists, Khelif and others couldn't be invited to a civil conversation to discuss the complexities of all of this and try to decide what to do for future Olympic events.
But what's happened here is a disgrace. She just won an Olympic gold medal and instead of being able to celebrate it she's been harassed, bullied and been the victim of baseless lies. Imagine how dehumanizing it must be reaching the top of your profession, only to have people spread lies about what's between your legs and shame you online for it. We have no evidence that she's ever done anything wrong here - she was born a woman, raised a woman, became a world class boxer and managed to win gold while going through all of this bullshit.
She's had the former President of the United States (who is running again), the richest man in the world, the richest author in the world and countless other influential people all participate in spreading lies about her being a man or being trans, at time when trans people are often the target of violent crime.