jellybeans
Registered User
- Nov 9, 2007
- 1,594
- 1,747
I feel so bad for you Oilers fans i predict that McDavid wont resign at the end of his contract horrible management many dark years to come.
I’d still like to see that, im sure it’s a mixed bag with how people took it. I tried toSome of the more senior players did describe it as less of a demand and that they were in control of their own phones. Whether or not that was them just being company men trying to make the story go away, or that's how it went down for the players who were less vulnerable to abuse, I don't know.
But it does make sense that the younger, less established players were the ones Babcock felt bold enough to blatantly invade the privacy of.
I think there is a definite age gap in the thought process of Babcock and how the young players received it. He probably genuinely wanted to know about them as people and the young guys thought he was looking for their private stash of fans. IYKYK.So why did the Blue Jackets call it a mistake to hire him, part ways with him, and then apologize to the players for hiring him?
Also read below:
I think there is a definite age gap in the thought process of Babcock and how the young players received it. He probably genuinely wanted to know about them as people and the young guys thought he was looking for their private stash. IYKYK.
No one serious has Crosby ahead of any of Gretzky, Orr, Howe, Lemieux.Crosby is already cemented into the top 5 by the majority of the hockey world. Some even rank him as high as 4th
Yeah, no. Crosby is what the majority think he is. A top 5 all time player. There is very little evidence to try and go against the grain on this oneNo one serious has Crosby ahead of any of Gretzky, Orr, Howe, Lemieux.
No Crosby is not cemented in top 5. Right now there is literal discussion that a Cup for McDavid automatically makes McDavid top 5 all-time and Cup is only thing keeping McDavid from that.
And Crosby lacks the sustained peak of other all-time greats. He has great elite consistency and longevity, but peak years lacking.
Not forcing, but tricking/conning/fooling.But Crosby is so powerful that if McDavid doesn't win a Cup with Edmonton it will his fault for forcing him to accept Babcock? That sounds like another feather in his cap.
I’ll go against the grain here and say they finally win the Cup now
No- Bobby Hull, Maurice Richard, Jean Beliveau, all have very great cases for 5th all-time. Other goalies like Roy/Hasek.Yeah, no. Crosby is what the majority think he is. A top 5 all time player.
Not forcing, but tricking/conning/fooling.
Again this is hypothetical- we do not know if Crosby ever discuss with McDavid on topic of Babcock. I just want to stress this point.
No point in derailing the thread anymore, we are clearly not going to agree on this.No- Bobby Hull, Maurice Richard, Jean Beliveau, all have very great cases for 5th all-time. Other goalies like Roy/Hasek.
Crosby lacks dominant period. Even in his own era, Ovi surpassed him in peak with that 3 season sustained stretch from 2008-2010.
Well if so it’ll be the first time Babcock has won a playoff series since 2013 soo…
Read what the NHL/NHLPA statement reads. The allegations are disturbing. They are basically agreeing he is a major dickhead, but they can not restrict him from coaching. They did not say "he is innocent" or "the allegations are false"
You are exactly right. "Which allegation is the most disturbing?"which allegation is the most disturbing to you
Not forcing, but tricking/conning/fooling.
Again this is hypothetical- we do not know if Crosby ever discuss with McDavid on topic of Babcock. I just want to stress this point.

No, but Daver is good guy. Strong Crosby fan but very respectful in interactions unlike some other people here.This has gotta be a meme account.
I think you are @daver ’s alt account that they use to get the Crosby talk going
You are exactly right. "Which allegation is the most disturbing?"
Because quite frankly, nobody is aware of any specific allegation other than the thing with Marner and the thing with the Blue Jackets phones.
Now, do I think those were the smartest ideas Babcock ever had? Not at all.
But they don't violate any HR or employment law policy, as far as I am aware.
A boss asking you to list your hardest working colleagues (as in Marner's case) as a motivation tactic is uncommon, but not against HR or employment law.
A boss asking to see pictures on your phone (as in the Blue Jackets case) as a way of getting to know you as a person is uncommon, but not against HR or employment law.
Both Marner and the Blue Jackets players could have simply refused, and only if Babcock retaliated would it become a HR or employment law issue.
Other than the thing with Marner and the thing with the Blue Jackets phones, what other "allegations" are there?
That he benched Mike Modano one time, benched Jason Spezza another time, and benched Chris Chelios another time? Maybe those weren't the nicest things to do, considering all of the circumstances involved, but at the same time he was within his right as a coach to bench whoever he wanted to bench.
After this, you really only have the words of Mike Commodore remaining. And he has never elaborated on any of the specific horrible things that he claims to have seen, so I think he may lack credibility.
Why hasn't Commodore elaborated on the horrible specific things he has seen? Why wouldn't he want it all out there as a means of protecting other players?
Commodore has a good personality and that is why a lot of internet hockey fans like him.
But at this moment, unless Commodore chooses to elaborate on the horrible specific things he saw, then I think he may simply be a person who has sour grapes that Babcock didn't play him enough or benched him for games that Commodore feels he shouldn't have been benched for.
The summer of Stan is finally starting!
Why hasn't Commodore elaborated on the horrible specific things he has seen? Why wouldn't he want it all out there as a means of protecting other players?