Oilers working to hire Mike Babcock as coach, officially cleared by NHL | Page 6 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Oilers working to hire Mike Babcock as coach, officially cleared by NHL

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Congrats to our latest Sportsbook winners - GOLD MEDAL kihei, SILVER MEDAL fish7 and BRONZE MEDAL Sammy Kat - new tournament begins today 6/15
Some of the more senior players did describe it as less of a demand and that they were in control of their own phones. Whether or not that was them just being company men trying to make the story go away, or that's how it went down for the players who were less vulnerable to abuse, I don't know.

But it does make sense that the younger, less established players were the ones Babcock felt bold enough to blatantly invade the privacy of.
I’d still like to see that, im sure it’s a mixed bag with how people took it. I tried to
Google but its all 2023 articles
 
So why did the Blue Jackets call it a mistake to hire him, part ways with him, and then apologize to the players for hiring him?

Also read below:
I think there is a definite age gap in the thought process of Babcock and how the young players received it. He probably genuinely wanted to know about them as people and the young guys thought he was looking for their private stash of fans. IYKYK.
 
I think there is a definite age gap in the thought process of Babcock and how the young players received it. He probably genuinely wanted to know about them as people and the young guys thought he was looking for their private stash. IYKYK.

Whatever his intentions were, it's just not appropriate for someone who is essentially their boss to ask or demand their phones to look through their photos.
 
Crosby is already cemented into the top 5 by the majority of the hockey world. Some even rank him as high as 4th
No one serious has Crosby ahead of any of Gretzky, Orr, Howe, Lemieux.

No Crosby is not cemented in top 5. Right now there is literal discussion that a Cup for McDavid automatically makes McDavid top 5 all-time and Cup is only thing keeping McDavid from that.

And Crosby lacks the sustained peak of other all-time greats. He has great elite consistency and longevity, but peak years lacking.
 
No one serious has Crosby ahead of any of Gretzky, Orr, Howe, Lemieux.

No Crosby is not cemented in top 5. Right now there is literal discussion that a Cup for McDavid automatically makes McDavid top 5 all-time and Cup is only thing keeping McDavid from that.

And Crosby lacks the sustained peak of other all-time greats. He has great elite consistency and longevity, but peak years lacking.
Yeah, no. Crosby is what the majority think he is. A top 5 all time player. There is very little evidence to try and go against the grain on this one
 
But Crosby is so powerful that if McDavid doesn't win a Cup with Edmonton it will his fault for forcing him to accept Babcock? That sounds like another feather in his cap.
Not forcing, but tricking/conning/fooling.

Again this is hypothetical- we do not know if Crosby ever discuss with McDavid on topic of Babcock. I just want to stress this point.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Beau Knows
Yeah, no. Crosby is what the majority think he is. A top 5 all time player.
No- Bobby Hull, Maurice Richard, Jean Beliveau, all have very great cases for 5th all-time. Other goalies like Roy/Hasek.

Crosby lacks dominant period. Even in his own era, Ovi surpassed him in peak with that 3 season sustained stretch from 2008-2010.
 
Not forcing, but tricking/conning/fooling.

Again this is hypothetical- we do not know if Crosby ever discuss with McDavid on topic of Babcock. I just want to stress this point.

This has gotta be a meme account.

I think you are @daver ’s alt account that they use to get the Crosby talk going
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slayer97
No- Bobby Hull, Maurice Richard, Jean Beliveau, all have very great cases for 5th all-time. Other goalies like Roy/Hasek.

Crosby lacks dominant period. Even in his own era, Ovi surpassed him in peak with that 3 season sustained stretch from 2008-2010.
No point in derailing the thread anymore, we are clearly not going to agree on this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
Read what the NHL/NHLPA statement reads. The allegations are disturbing. They are basically agreeing he is a major dickhead, but they can not restrict him from coaching. They did not say "he is innocent" or "the allegations are false"

which allegation is the most disturbing to you
You are exactly right. "Which allegation is the most disturbing?"

Because quite frankly, nobody is aware of any specific allegation other than the thing with Marner and the thing with the Blue Jackets phones.

Now, do I think those were the smartest ideas Babcock ever had? Not at all.

But they don't violate any HR or employment law policy, as far as I am aware.

A boss asking you to list your hardest working colleagues (as in Marner's case) as a motivation tactic is uncommon, but not against HR or employment law.

A boss asking to see pictures on your phone (as in the Blue Jackets case) as a way of getting to know you as a person is uncommon, but not against HR or employment law.

Both Marner and the Blue Jackets players could have simply refused, and only if Babcock retaliated would it become a HR or employment law issue.

Other than the thing with Marner and the thing with the Blue Jackets phones, what other "allegations" are there?

That he benched Mike Modano one time, benched Jason Spezza another time, and benched Chris Chelios another time? Maybe those weren't the nicest things to do, considering all of the circumstances involved, but at the same time he was within his right as a coach to bench whoever he wanted to bench.

After this, you really only have the words of Mike Commodore remaining. And he has never elaborated on any of the specific horrible things that he claims to have seen, so I think he may lack credibility.

Why hasn't Commodore elaborated on the horrible specific things he has seen? Why wouldn't he want it all out there as a means of protecting other players?

Commodore has a good personality and that is why a lot of internet hockey fans like him.

But at this moment, unless Commodore chooses to elaborate on the horrible specific things he saw, then I think he may simply be a person who has sour grapes that Babcock didn't play him enough or benched him for games that Commodore feels he shouldn't have been benched for.
 
Not forcing, but tricking/conning/fooling.

Again this is hypothetical- we do not know if Crosby ever discuss with McDavid on topic of Babcock. I just want to stress this point.

If McDavid is getting tricked into hiring the wrong coach by a guy who played like 13 games for him then he has no one to blame but himself. Also what does any of this have to do with the topic? :laugh:
 
If they had just waited a few more weeks to determine who they wanted to hire, they could have just gotten Tortorella who's a hardass without being a bully.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
You are exactly right. "Which allegation is the most disturbing?"

Because quite frankly, nobody is aware of any specific allegation other than the thing with Marner and the thing with the Blue Jackets phones.

Now, do I think those were the smartest ideas Babcock ever had? Not at all.

But they don't violate any HR or employment law policy, as far as I am aware.

A boss asking you to list your hardest working colleagues (as in Marner's case) as a motivation tactic is uncommon, but not against HR or employment law.

A boss asking to see pictures on your phone (as in the Blue Jackets case) as a way of getting to know you as a person is uncommon, but not against HR or employment law.

Both Marner and the Blue Jackets players could have simply refused, and only if Babcock retaliated would it become a HR or employment law issue.

Other than the thing with Marner and the thing with the Blue Jackets phones, what other "allegations" are there?

That he benched Mike Modano one time, benched Jason Spezza another time, and benched Chris Chelios another time? Maybe those weren't the nicest things to do, considering all of the circumstances involved, but at the same time he was within his right as a coach to bench whoever he wanted to bench.

After this, you really only have the words of Mike Commodore remaining. And he has never elaborated on any of the specific horrible things that he claims to have seen, so I think he may lack credibility.

Why hasn't Commodore elaborated on the horrible specific things he has seen? Why wouldn't he want it all out there as a means of protecting other players?

Commodore has a good personality and that is why a lot of internet hockey fans like him.

But at this moment, unless Commodore chooses to elaborate on the horrible specific things he saw, then I think he may simply be a person who has sour grapes that Babcock didn't play him enough or benched him for games that Commodore feels he shouldn't have been benched for.
 
Why hasn't Commodore elaborated on the horrible specific things he has seen? Why wouldn't he want it all out there as a means of protecting other players?

I'm pretty sure he's said exactly why. It's not his place to tell those stories, if other players want to talk about their experiences it should be up to them to do so.

At this point we have more than enough stories that have come out to show that Babcock is an asshole. I don't think anything he's done is enough to justify the NHL banning him, so I think todays decision is the correct one (based on what is known publicly anyways). But that doesn't mean teams have to hire him either, and I think this is a huge risk for Edmonton.
 
images


This shit looks like a horror movie poster.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad