You are misquoting me.
I said, "
there were signs that this was a bad player to take an especially 4 million dollar gamble on."
In other words, A bad bet.
You extrapolated that to mean, "
What were the signs he was a bad player?"
He wasn't a bad player, but there were signs he was going to be a bad player this year...
He is a small, slow, cerebral player on the cusp of 30 who just had a major leg injury which affects his skating. This inhibits his speed, maneuverability, and ability to avoid checks. Did he succeed? Did he do everything right? How healthy is he? How susceptible to injury is he now due to being a small, even slower player? Will he play the perimeter? He lets it be known that he is having a life moment while being injured. An epipheny? What? It took him a full year to rehab. Could he have worked harder to get back for his team? He's been traded/let go how many times? Is he a bit of a headcase? He was a 30 point player before injury, what will he be now? Should he be signed for 4 million in a flat cap world?
Results. The player this year re-injured himself in game 9 despite playing a perimeter game. He looks small, slow and rarely engages in contact. When he does, he gets hurt. He has been hit hard this year due to his lack of mobility. When he tries to do something other than make a good pass he gets hit or catches an edge and gingerly leaves the ice. He has one assist and is -10 in 24 games despite playing with the best players in the world. He cooled McDavid and Draisaitl. He appears to be a bit of a headcase with his on-ice behavior.
You wouldn't be the first to use confirmation bias. Nor the first to go on exhaustively how you do not suffer from it like the rest of us mortals.