"on pace" is used alot... He's scored 51 points since he's been in the NHL.. That does not make him a legit 50 point player until he does it more than once.. If you want to call him a 45+ point player fine, but 45 points is worth 5.5M cap hit? If that is the case, why are people whining about Richards making 6.6M (Cap hit), when he was "on pace" for a 60 point season despite being horrible? Not to mention people think he was "horrible for the money" his first season when he had almost 70 points.
Because Richards isn't a dynamic player. He doesn't pull electrifying moves that take you out of your seat. He's naturally been a very productive player who is also just adept at pulling in points on the PP - it's all very natural to him. He's the kind of player who could have a 4 point night and you had barely noticed the little things he did to get those points.