yeah the Don is too simple and obvious, gotta keep it creativeI'm going old school: The Wadfather.
yeah the Don is too simple and obvious, gotta keep it creativeI'm going old school: The Wadfather.
And the third is exercising her veto powers. So there.2 out of 3 mods have indicated the new PHOPs nickname should be...wait for it...very hip...D-Wad....
He also believes what we all should believe. That prospects shouldn’t be rushed. Let them earn the job before clearing space for it.
yeah the Don is too simple and obvious, gotta keep it creative
Some of you would be much happier if you assumed the plan is to tank this year and get one more core piece before trying to compete.
interesting that Roslovic has went unsigned so far. curious to see where Jack ends up
Look around the conference and league and then tell me that's in the remotest realm of possibility. This is a bottom three roster and it isn't particularly close. [insert defensive LHD born pre-1997 here] isn't changing that.An LHD? One who can play third pairing minutes? One who can shut down the opposition?
I think the problem is that this would improve the defense too much too quickly. The last thing this team needs is to miss the playoffs but be a mid-range team, picking 14th in each round.
As a guy who was drafted top 10 and has spent 2 years in the minors he should be ready to move into NHL duty. He got jerked around enough last year and seemed to play strongly in the AHL playoffs. If anyone deserves the opportunity he should be due to take it. Mateychuk should not be gifted a spot. He needs to earn it with his limited pro experience.We can all say that but so far the only thing Wads has done for the D is clear space.
We'll have to see if he brings anyone else in, and what side they play. If he doesn't bring in anyone who is right-side capable, then it's obvious he's making room for Jiricek, who at this point hasn't earned an NHL job.
As a guy who was drafted top 10 and has spent 2 years in the minors he should be ready to move into NHL duty. He got jerked around enough last year and seemed to play strongly in the AHL playoffs. If anyone deserves the opportunity he should be due to take it. Mateychuk should not be gifted a spot. He needs to earn it with his limited pro experience.
I think what I'm trying to say is that both players should be given the opportunity to earn a spot but Jiricek should be closer because he is more experienced. We'll sign at least one more guy on D and who knows what trades may bring.So by "not gifting spots" you really mean "not gifting spots unless the guy has draft pedigree and has been in the AHL for two years". That's a different standard for me.
Jiricek was classic Jiricek in the playoffs. He has game changing scoring ability at that level but his defense was still not good enough. I don't think he's ready.
In the Fall Mateychuk simply might be better than Jiricek, it isn't just a question of how much AHL experience they have. To me gifting a spot would be putting a guy on the roster who isn't ready enough.
McNabb or Hague I think would be a very solid pick-up.Trying to think outside the box for a D-man on the third pairing left side, assuming Schmidt is gone and all the UFA options are dried up.
There are numerous teams above the cap or brushing right up against it who could be ripe for the picking of a player for very cheap or nothing at all. In saying that, I'm mostly looking for short term (1-2 years left) and shutdown ability. So, lets see some options.
Washington: Trevor van Riemsdyk
Vegas: Brayden McNabb, Nic Hague
Edmonton: Brett Kulak
Minnesota: Jon Merrill
Nashville: Dante Fabbro, Jeremy Lauzon
Not sure of fit or any of their analytical numbers but these are the guys who stuck out for me as potential "cheap" adds. My main targets from here IMO would be McNabb, Hague, or Kulak.
I have a secret for you... mo one signs free agents at a discount. Once the top ones are gone, then the bargains can be found.Did anyone really expect us to sign premier free agents at discounts?
We'll have to see if he brings anyone else in, and what side they play. If he doesn't bring in anyone who is right-side capable, then it's obvious he's making room for Jiricek, who at this point hasn't earned an NHL job.
68 pts in 100 AHL games as a teenage defenseman is phenomenal.
What would the return be for Laine? What do the Ducks have to make it the hockey trade that Waddell wants?When it comes to Patrik Laine
Anaheim Ducks are actually under the salary cap floor as of now. Pat Verbeek was quiet on the first day of free agency but he has said that "he plans to add a top-four defenseman and a top-six winger, both right-handed shots ideally".
They have the need, the space to take the whole contract...
I think it would make sense.
I'm aware of that, it is a phenomenal number of points.
Rather than assuming it I'll let you tell me the point you're making.
If Jiriceks goal is to win the Norris, he's got a good chance, if he's trying to be a competent two way top pairing D, he should probably play some more in the AHL and work on his defensive ability.68 pts in 100 AHL games as a teenage defenseman is phenomenal.
It's not that he's not earning it, his defensive play is questionable, he's not strong enough and his positioning is suspect.The point is you saying, "he hasn't earned the job". 100 games in the AHL is earning it a lot more than Mateychuk or any other defensive prospects.
Look at other d-men:
Provorov-NHL debut 20 years old-zero AHL games
Werenski-NHL debut 19 years old-7 AHL games
Gudbranson-NHL debut-19 years old-zero AHL games
Severson-NHL debut 20 years old-2 AHL games
How did these younger guys "earn" their shot?
It's not that he's not earning it, his defensive play is questionable, he's not strong enough and his positioning is suspect.
Offensively he's without a doubt a force. But what does that mean if he's a liability in his own end?