Are you kidding, aren't you???
Trading Quick and go with 2 #1A goalies?
How old are you? 8? We are not talking about ****ing NHL16, this is the real NHL.
There are some great posters on this board, but people like you are the reason why I stopped posting.
Jesus Christ...
did i ever say trade Quick?
i think it's your own idiocy and failure to comprehend what people are trying to say, mixed with your quickness to judge that is keeping you off these boards
and i hope you stay away as far as possible
i'll explain to those that have the IQ of an 8 year old
1 bad year of Quick is a hiccup
2 bad years and we start finding excuses for him
3 bad years and it's a pattern
at this point, Quick is a 1A
so therefore, instead of hiring a genuine backup i.e. Enroth, Budaj
it would be wise to hire an experienced (possibly former #1 goalie) to handle some of the load
Quick can't play out of position acrobatic splits style for 65-75 games a year + playoffs
we need to lessen the load for his own sake; give him 55-60 games a year
and let a guy like a Hiller, Ward, Reimer, and co handle some 20-25 games (and i just named names i don't want to hear you say Ward is too expensive, Hiller isn't available blablabla - i'm just naming you examples!)
the Dallas model is intelligent, i understand that it backfired but they weren't anticipating Lehtonen to play this poorly, no one did
but knowing that these former #1s were on a decline, there is strength in numbers and having Niemi & Lehtonen was an intelligent move despite the contracts
If Hiller can't find a job, it would be nice to have him @ 2m - 3m
but again, people are very unusually blind to how poorly QUick has played since his surgery
do you understand me better now when i regurgitate it for you little boy?
now keep doing what you did until you disappear; we are richer for having lost you