Navin R Slavin
Fifth line center
If they match, they can't trade him for one year from the date of matching onwards.
Ah, interesting.
If they match, they can't trade him for one year from the date of matching onwards.
Yep. You gotta make it extraordinarily painful for the other team, or flat out impossible to match. And you have to not mind the other team's management and fans hating everything about your franchise from the darkest depths of their souls.
Which means they're targeting Toronto.
Damn our cursed affinity for draft picks!I think most other fan bases are thinking a contract that is heavily front loaded and full of bonuses is something our cheap owner wouldn’t match even if we could easily fit the AAV under the cap.
I’m not sure they are wrong.
Took out their tiny Finn 1C?Habs fans throwing shade at us over on their board. Still mad that Williams carved Koivu's eye out in 2006 I see. Bunch of ****ing losers.
Habs fans throwing shade at us over on their board. Still mad that Williams carved Koivu's eye out in 2006 I see. Bunch of ****ing losers.
I still get a laugh out of how many of them still think they were some kind of lock to win the Cup that year and Koivu and his two secondary assists would have won the Conn Symthe. They would have gotten their asses handed to them by Ottawa or New Jersey eventually.
I guess we'll find out. But I seriously doubt it. You don't offer sheet unless you're pretty sure it's a lock, and Dundon is on record saying that Aho is the cornerstone of the franchise.
50.7 Variability Rules for Multi-Year SPCs.
(a) For all "Front-Loaded SPCs" (as defined below), the difference between the stated Player Salary and Bonuses in any immediately adjacent League Years of that SPC cannot exceed thirty-five (35) percent of the stated Player Salary and Bonuses of the first League Year of such Front-Loaded SPC. Additionally, under no circumstances may the stated Player Salary and Bonuses in any League Year of a Front-Loaded SPC be less than fifty (50) percent of the highest stated Player Salary and Bonuses in a League Year of that same Front-Loaded SPC.
(i) To determine whether an SPC is a Front-Loaded SPC:
(A) Take the total number of League Years in the SPC and divide by two (2) ("First-Half Term");
(B) Add the amounts of all stated Player Salary and Bonuses in the First-Half Term. If the SPC has an odd number of League Years, allocate to the first half of the SPC one-half of the stated Player Salary and Bonuses paid to the Player in the middle League Year of such SPC (e.g., the fourth year of a seven-year SPC) ("FirstHalf Stated Player Salary and Bonuses");
(C) Divide the First-Half Stated Player Salary and Bonuses by the First-Half Term. The resulting amount shall be the "First-Half Averaged Amount";
(D) Calculate the Averaged Amount of the SPC in a manner consistent with Section 50.5(d)(ii);
(E) If the First-Half Averaged Amount is greater than the Averaged Amount for the entire term of the SPC, such SPC is a "Front-Loaded SPC" and must comply with Section 50.7(a). Any SPC other than a Front-Loaded SPC must comply with Section 50.7(b) rather than Section 50.7(a).
(b) "The 100 Percent Rule" for Multi-Year SPCs. For any SPC that is not a FrontLoaded SPC, the difference between the stated Player Salary and Bonuses in the first two League Years of an SPC cannot exceed the amount of the lower of the two League Years. Thereafter, in all subsequent League Years of the SPC, (i) any increase in Player Salary and Bonuses from one League Year to another may not exceed the amount of the lower of the first two League Years of the SPC (or, if such amounts are the same, that same amount); and (ii) any decrease in Player Salary and Bonuses from one League Year to another may not exceed fifty (50) percent of the Player Salary and Bonuses of the lower of the first two League Years of the SPC (or, if such amounts are the same, 50 percent of that same amount).
I think there’s a general sense because I can’t remember a time when so many top tier RFAs have been unsigned at this point in time. Maybe I just don’t recall it happening before.
The offre hostile doesn't need to be done today. If they drag signing to late August someone with space might get tempted. Today is really the first day they technically can be offred a SPC.I don't think it has happened to this extent before but it makes sense from the perspective that they are all just waiting for the market to develop. I think once the first big RFA is signed the rest get done in quick succession.
Can't remember where I read it but saw an interesting comment that was saying they were doubting an offer sheet actually gets signed and once all of the RFAs realize there isn't other opportunities they all come down and meet their teams in the middle.
One way or another we will find out soon.
I don't want an offer sheet. There's a chance a team could front load the contract to the extent we're not willing to match it. Then when we don't match, we'll have to listen to how we're suddenly the Patriots of the NHL after one good season, and how four 1sts are so0o0o much more valuable than Aho, or something like that.I hope someone offer sheets Aho just so we can match and move on. The CBA doesn't allow the shenanigans that has Nashville in trouble with Weber anymore so any contract is going to be reasonable, and if it isn't we will have enough picks coming back our way to make make up for it in trades later.
But after what happened with Nylander last year, I highly doubt we will be seeing any for a long time to come.