They also haven’t had a Stone level player to trade. And Ottawa’s return on Karlsson was pretty poorNo, but Brannstrom is potentially a franchise player. Quality over quantity. Opposite of NYR's method.
Stone is better than anything we've had to trade the past two years. So, I don't think it's really fair to say "the opposite of" what we're doing.No, but Brannstrom is potentially a franchise player. Quality over quantity. Opposite of NYR's method.
They didn't get overwhelming quantity. They just didn't have a Stone to move.No, but Brannstrom is potentially a franchise player. Quality over quantity. Opposite of NYR's method.
No, but Brannstrom is potentially a franchise player. Quality over quantity. Opposite of NYR's method.
No, but Brannstrom is potentially a franchise player. Quality over quantity. Opposite of NYR's method.
No, but Brannstrom is potentially a franchise player. Quality over quantity. Opposite of NYR's method.
That's not comparable to the Hayes package.That's a little bit better than the Hayes package.
Stone is not a little bit better than Hayes.
Ottawa got ripped.
Stone is better than anything we've had to trade the past two years. So, I don't think it's really fair to say "the opposite of" what we're doing.
It isn't some crazy amount better. It is better, sure, but not the difference in package that the difference between rental Hayes and re-signed Stone is.That's not comparable to the Hayes package.
Stone is better than anything we've had to trade the past two years. So, I don't think it's really fair to say "the opposite of" what we're doing.
It is a better overall package, but look at Kevin Hayes and look at Mark Stone.Brannstrom would be our best D prospect... how is that not better than what Hayes got?
Hed be out best prospectBrannstrom would be our best D prospect... how is that not better than what Hayes got?
If Winnipeg got Hayes and Stone they would have Purple Hayes and Stone Free