GDT: Official Trade Deadline Thread Part XXX

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

How did JG do on the Zucc trade?


  • Total voters
    285
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Stanley is a magical first round pick.

Hajek 5 points in 60 games? He's young, HFD is bad.
Stanley 10 points in 60 games? OmG hE sO bAD
Or most likely they are both not good. Of course they are young, but such paltry offensive totals are not encouraging.
 
Ok but can we get something better than Stanley. He stinks and has no spot in this organization. Hed prob be our 5th best left handed dman prospect

He's 20 and massive.

Yes history says that he probably flames out or hangs around as a 3rd pair/extra but sometimes these guys hit and become top 4 or even top pairing guys.

For a rental player, that isn't a bad gamble if he comes along with a 1st.
 
From the hockeywriters.com site

Stanley’s footspeed, and in particular his ability to turn in a hurry, were concerns through much of his junior career.

Sound familiar? Like I said he’s a lefty mcilrath
How fast is he compared to Chara
 
Ok but can we get something better than Stanley. He stinks and has no spot in this organization. Hed prob be our 5th best left handed dman prospect

I dunno, I think Stanley and a first is better than the Stastny deal last year.

Would I take someone over Stanley? Sure, br I don’t know if they’re on the table.

The biggest challenge I see right now is that people are blinking back the dreams of Tolvanen and others like him that they allowed to creep into their thoughts yesterday.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NYR Viper
Knowing nothing about Stanley, I’d still say it appears he doesn’t fit the mold of a modern puck lugging defenseman. I think the Rangers prefer a defenseman who can create transition rather than one who is better in his own end. Not saying the guy is bad. Just that he might not be a fit style-wise.
 
They have the best offer on the table right now I am told. But I know not what it is other than a young defenseman and a 1st. No details. We are snagging a lot of assets. And it is not over yet. JG is a very smart man I must admit. The future looks very promising if the scouts do due diligence
Young defenseman is great. CGY is loaded. Valimaki, Andersson, Kylington... prefer them in that order
 
That’s kind of how I feel, Stanley and a first would be a 4.5/10 return for me (10 would be something insanely lopsided in the Rangers favor)

I’d give it about a 6 or 7.

I think Stanley is better than he’s getting credit for.

Not great, and not without risk and downside, but not without upside either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Richard Banger
He's 20 and massive.

Yes history says that he probably flames out or hangs around as a 3rd pair/extra but sometimes these guys hit and become top 4 or even top pairing guys.

For a rental player, that isn't a bad gamble if he comes along with a 1st.
Ok but there are so many other areas in our prospect pool we need addressing. Left-handed dmen are the one area we have a bunch of
 
I’d give it about a 6 or 7.

I think Stanley is better than he’s getting credit for.

Not great, and not without risk and downside, but not without upside either.
I don’t mean to say he’s terrible, I just personally don’t like him all that much. I wouldn’t mind the deal, but I wouldn’t be wading around these boards for 90 minutes telling everyone that hates that deal how wrong they are
 
If Jets are offering Stanley and a 1st... BBK said Calgary has the best offer... Valimaki/Andersson and a 1st..

Bidding war?
 
If it's a 1st and a D prospect for Hayes from Calgary, I seriously doubt it's Kylington, Andersson, or Valimaki. That would be robbery from Gorton unless Hayes is signing an extension.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haveandare
If Hayes goes to Calgary I'd be happy with Andersson, #1 and a conditional #2 in 2020 if he resigns (3rd if he doesn't). Bit of a step down from the Duchane trade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Barnaby
I dunno, I think Stanley and a first is better than the Stastny deal last year.

Would I take someone over Stanley? Sure, br I don’t know if they’re on the table.

The biggest challenge I see right now is that people are blinking back the dreams of Tolvanen and others like him that they allowed to creep into their thoughts yesterday.
I agree that Tolvanen and players of that caliber are highly unrealistic. But theres gotta be prospects in other areas we can get instead for Hayes. We have too many lefthanded dmen prospects as it is so why bring in another one who seems questionable
 
Knowing nothing about Stanley, I’d still say it appears he doesn’t fit the mold of a modern puck lugging defenseman. I think the Rangers prefer a defenseman who can create transition rather than one who is better in his own end. Not saying the guy is bad. Just that he might not be a fit style-wise.
We will need reliable partners for Pionk and ADA. It can't be Staal forever.
 
I will say since the Rangers are apparently into Logan Stanley, maybe they’re trying to create a blue line of gigantic lefties and slightly undersized righties
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad