Sabretooth
Registered User
Thats whats been going on? I could have sworn it has a lot of raging and carrying on about the Sabres defying reality and math. Don't recall if you were one of them but thats what the bulk of the posts were. And no one is surprised they are struggling and playing as poorly as they are right now. The team finally found a structure that worked for them anchored by this top 6. Moulson/Girgs/Ennis and Flynn/Mitchell/Gionta. The defense emerged with a good top 4. Myers anchored the top pair playing huge minutes. Zads emerged and paired with Risto made an effective 2nd pairing. Obvious the other benefit was others like Mess and Benoit played less or not at all.
That structure has been blown apart but injuries and illness. Thats why we are struggling and playing horribly right now and why few should be surprised by it.
For comparions sake.
During that 13gm run where we went 10-3-0, with that structure in place. We scored 33 goals (2.54 goals for/game) and gave up 29 goals (2.33 goals against/game).
Starting with Mitchell leaving the lineup for the last 9gms, Myers last 7, Gionta/Foligno last 6.
In the last 9gms we've scored 15 goals (1.67 goals for/game) and gave up 41 goals (4.56 goals against/game).
I recall the ranting and raging about "ruining the tank!", "The tank is over!", "Murray is a failure", "Trade myers/enroth/anyone!", etc.
And then I recall me and others telling people to relax, that the sabres are just getting unexpectedly good results based on their play, its not sustainable, stats still show how the sabres are by far the worst team in the league, wait to see how fast we drop when: enroth cools down, injuries hit, we stop scoring 3 goals on 15 shots, other teams' goaltending is better than .750 in games against us, etc. And now, we've had some injuries to key players (unfortunate, but not unexpected. Every team deals with injuries throughout the season), enroth has posted a .871 sv % over his last 5 starts, and girgs for example is only shooting at a still not bad but more realistic 8.3% shooting percentage over his last 10 games rather than his all-star level 14.1% season average.
And of course whenever any of that was mentioned over the past few weeks, it was met with a mocking chorus of "guess advance stats are wrong", "watch the game!", "shot quality!", "Team defense!", "Keeping shots to the outside!", "Enroth is playing sustainably because his season average is sustainable!", "Won again? I thought advanced stats said we should lose! I thought this was unsustainable ", etc. Those were all things I remember people saying and are the only ranting and raving I remember.
Yeah we've had some injuries/illnesses but they've been pretty mild compared to a lot of other teams. Nothing that a good team wouldn't expect to deal with over the course of a season. Yeah we did have a good thing going. Nolan pretty much had the team set up to get the absolute most out of it anyone could (and thats a compliment considering I've never thought nolan was anything special), but everyone should have been able to see how fragile it was. It was a house of cards and it was never going to take very much to knock down. Most other teams could take the injuries we've had in stride without completely falling apart. We don't have the depth and experience, and injuries have always been part of the consideration (at least from my viewpoint) when discussing the tank and not worrying about it.
For comparions sake.
During that 13gm run where we went 10-3-0, with that structure in place. We scored 33 goals (2.54 goals for/game) and gave up 29 goals (2.33 goals against/game).
Shots for: 309 (23.8/game)
Shots against: 448 (34.5/game)
Starting with Mitchell leaving the lineup for the last 9gms, Myers last 7, Gionta/Foligno last 6.
In the last 9gms we've scored 15 goals (1.67 goals for/game) and gave up 41 goals (4.56 goals against/game).
Shots for: 214 (23.7/game)
Shots against: 303 (33.7/game)
We're not shooting less or giving up more shots per game now after the injuries compared to during the 13 game run. What would you say accounts for the fact that fewer of our shots are going in, while more of our opponent shots are going in? If injuries were the sole responsibility, I'd suspect that would show up in giving up more shots while taking fewer, but that is not the case.
Last edited: