Blue Jays Discussion: Off-season Edition II - Winter Meeting Madness

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Correct me if I’m wrong but now that arbitration has been scheduled for Bo…the team has a policy that they will no longer negotiate beforehand, it’s now completely up to the arbitrator

They can negotiate a long term contract but the jays are a file and trial team so they will not do a 1 year deal now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hockeywiz542
For those of you that are casting shade at Bo in this Arb dispute. The Jays offered $5mil to a player who slashed .290/.333/.469 with 24 homers, 13 steals and 93 RBIs in 159 games and $4.1 million to a 16 year old in the same week, who's played zero games for the Jays.

$7 mil is not an unreasonable ask.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beaumaris
For those of you that are casting shade at Bo in this Arb dispute. The Jays offered $5mil to a player who slashed .290/.333/.469 with 24 homers, 13 steals and 93 RBIs in 159 games and $4.1 million to a 16 year old in the same week, who's played zero games for the Jays.

$7 mil is not an unreasonable ask.
Those things are not related in any way. It's a problem with the system, not with Bo or the Jays. Given the system that's in place, the Jays offer seems more in line with precedents than Bo's ask .
 
Additional Arb year salaries are based off, in part, the previous years, so a 2 million savings one year might be 6-10 by the time arbitration is through.

This situation speaks, in part, to why extensions are going to be harder for Bo and Vlad than say, Acuna.

They both come from extremely wealthy families, so can afford more easily to bet on themselves in FA. For Acuna or Albies, a big contract is generational wealth for their families, and the security of an extension is insurance against career ending injury.
 
Those things are not related in any way. It's a problem with the system, not with Bo or the Jays. Given the system that's in place, the Jays offer seems more in line with precedents than Bo's ask .

I get there is a formula, my comment was more directed at fans that were throwing shade at Bo for being the only player to not sign the Jays offer. I think Bo is in the right to ask for $7mil TBH.
 
For those of you that are casting shade at Bo in this Arb dispute. The Jays offered $5mil to a player who slashed .290/.333/.469 with 24 homers, 13 steals and 93 RBIs in 159 games and $4.1 million to a 16 year old in the same week, who's played zero games for the Jays.

$7 mil is not an unreasonable ask.
Bo is entitled to do whatever he wants but his number is not in line with recent precedent and he will likely lose. If he had of played ball he likely is signed at around 6 million. So he will lose his arbitration and principal will cost him around a million dollars. I am sure he is well aware of that and will make it up and then some when he cashes in during free agency. Has literally nothing to do with the international signings. Nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wry n Ginger and kb
I get there is a formula, my comment was more directed at fans that were throwing shade at Bo for being the only player to not sign the Jays offer. I think Bo is in the right to ask for $7mil TBH.
I get that you're probably just responding to the couple of oddballs who clearly dislike Bo for some reason, but I think the vast majority of the response is as simple as "That ask is too high based on precedent and he probably won't get it." Talking about actual on-field value, Bo would be in the right asking for $25 million. But that's unfortunately not how the system works.

Personally, I like when players do this kind of thing. He'll probably end up losing his case and getting $5 million. He could have settled for somewhere in the middle, but he's going to aim high, and if he does manage to win it'll set a new precedent that can have a snowball affect that ultimately gets players way more than the couple million he's going for. I hope he wins because more money going to the players is better than more money staying with the owners.
 
I get that you're probably just responding to the couple of oddballs who clearly dislike Bo for some reason, but I think the vast majority of the response is as simple as "That ask is too high based on precedent and he probably won't get it." Talking about actual on-field value, Bo would be in the right asking for $25 million. But that's unfortunately not how the system works.

Personally, I like when players do this kind of thing. He'll probably end up losing his case and getting $5 million. He could have settled for somewhere in the middle, but he's going to aim high, and if he does manage to win it'll set a new precedent that can have a snowball affect that ultimately gets players way more than the couple million he's going for. I hope he wins because more money going to the players is better than more money staying with the owners.
I take this as Bo trying to push extension negotiations.
 
I get that you're probably just responding to the couple of oddballs who clearly dislike Bo for some reason, but I think the vast majority of the response is as simple as "That ask is too high based on precedent and he probably won't get it." Talking about actual on-field value, Bo would be in the right asking for $25 million. But that's unfortunately not how the system works.

Personally, I like when players do this kind of thing. He'll probably end up losing his case and getting $5 million. He could have settled for somewhere in the middle, but he's going to aim high, and if he does manage to win it'll set a new precedent that can have a snowball affect that ultimately gets players way more than the couple million he's going for. I hope he wins because more money going to the players is better than more money staying with the owners.

That’s fine, I just hope the Jays highlight every single flaw he has out on the field during the arb hearing.
 




Really liking this signing period which means it will be horrible because anything i like isnt any good.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: aingefan
Seems like they signed some promising international prospects.
This team has always been front of the line when it comes to the Caribbean and South American markets. Goes all the way back to Gillick and Epy Guerrero, although I seem to recall there was a period there (Ricciardi era?) where we decided to pull our scouts and development people out. I think it pissed off a lot of agents and baseball people from there, especially in the Dominican. NIce to see we're investing in these players again now. Maybe the only other team that has a longer history in those areas is the Dodgers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hockeywiz542
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad