RABBIT
AKA Turd Ferguson
Note they are quoting the Canucks beat writer on a radio show. Podkolzin would be insane. If they offer it, BA please just take it
Note they are quoting the Canucks beat writer on a radio show. Podkolzin would be insane. If they offer it, BA please just take it
This much we know:
Oliver Ekman-Larsson has almost certainly played his last game for the Arizona Coyotes, and he’d like to play his next one for either the Vancouver Canucks or Boston Bruins. Attempts to get the Coyotes captain to expand the list of destinations he’d waive a no-movement clause for have proven unsuccessful. Ekman-Larsson feels he signed with Arizona in good faith and if the Coyotes want to move on, he’s earned the right to use his NMC. So, barring a last-minute change of heart, it’s either going to be Vancouver or Boston. Neither of those teams owns its 2020 first-round pick, which means a potential return likely starts with a 2021 first and includes a prospect, plus another pick.
This isn’t an easy deal for new Arizona general manager Bill Armstrong to maneuver because he’s dealing with a limited market.
The Coyotes like Boston’s prospects more than Vancouver’s, but, on the weekend, it seemed like the Canucks were the more motivated buyer, liking the idea of a long-time left side of Ekman-Larsson and Quinn Hughes. It is believed Arizona asked about Thatcher Demko, which would have been a non-starter.
Armstrong was in St. Louis when the Blues acquired Ryan O’Reilly in a package that included a first-rounder, a second-rounder and Tage Thompson. It would make sense if he tried to model this deal after that one.
Everyone’s grinding away here.
I'd do coke off of RABBIT's ass if we got Podkolzin.
Yeah, I don't see it. Vancouver is probably better moving him elsewhere. Are we going to flip him? He's definitely better than Hill, but...Demko is interesting but where the hell does he fit? Our starter next year? And where does it leave Prosvetov?
Im hoping Armstrong pulls out some magic on us. But prepared to be a little disappointed of course.Imagine Schmaltz for Ristolainen and then OEL in a deal for Virtanen and futures or DeBrusk and futures.
Imagine Schmaltz for Ristolainen and then OEL in a deal for Virtanen and futures or DeBrusk and futures.
Schmaltz and Raanta for Risto and Thompson then.We would need more from Buffalo. Risto can put up some points but he is a defensive liability
Schmaltz and Raanta for Risto and Thompson then.
Then OEL for DeBrusk, Beecher and other futures.
Beecher and Thompson would revitalize the pool quite a bit. Especially if we get some extra picks.
Bruins fans here, as good as OEL is we need scoring and a second line winger, so it makes no sense to trade Debrusk.Schmaltz and Raanta for Risto and Thompson then.
Then OEL for DeBrusk, Beecher and other futures.
Beecher and Thompson would revitalize the pool quite a bit. Especially if we get some extra picks.
I don't even love DeBrusk, but downgrading while still being reasonably competitive, getting a locker room shakeup, and refilling the prospect pool/organizational depth should be exactly what they try to do.Schmaltz and Raanta for Risto and Thompson then.
Then OEL for DeBrusk, Beecher and other futures.
Beecher and Thompson would revitalize the pool quite a bit. Especially if we get some extra picks.
My guess is he would be our starter with Hill as backup. Trade Kuemper and Raanta for picks.Demko is interesting but where the hell does he fit? Our starter next year? And where does it leave Prosvetov?