But that's not how you should look at it.
We didn't have Lundkvist, we had a first, and that first could be way more than Lundkvist.
Truth is, most years, even with the best roster, you're not going to win the cup. I think this moves them closer to being good enough to beat any of those teams over 7 games.Whose clearly ahead of them?
Boston? Yup they're a wagon.
Carolina? They're good too though they've been a consistent 2 and out for a while now.
Toronto? Sure but replace the 2 and out with 1.
Tampa is still Tampa so if you want to throw them in there I'll buy it.
Carolina is the only team in our division in that group. Some may say NJ but I'd peep their analytics, they've been ass for a while now and thats a team with next to no experience and they're really small. That never plays in the spring.
Serious question. Would you rather make the playoffs every year only to get bounced in the 2nd round or have 3-4 year stretches where we are legit cup contenders but then are a seller at the deadline for 2-3 years?
The Rangers have had 4 1sts outside of the top 10 since 2017.
Chytil
Miller
Nils
Schneider.
All of them are playing in the NHL, 2 are borderline stars.
This meme is dumb.
You mean foolish teams who don't study the results of rentals usually give that up at the deadline and then don't win the Cup? Yes, that's pretty much exactly what happens normally.
I would dress Cuylle-Goody-Gauts as the 4th line nowWould expect them to get another bottom 6 guy. Probably a center so they can shoot Lechsychensurjen into the moon
Whose clearly ahead of them?
Boston? Yup they're a wagon.
Carolina? They're good too though they've been a consistent 2 and out for a while now.
Toronto? Sure but replace the 2 and out with 1.
Tampa is still Tampa so if you want to throw them in there I'll buy it.
Carolina is the only team in our division in that group. Some may say NJ but I'd peep their analytics, they've been ass for a while now and thats a team with next to no experience and they're really small. That never plays in the spring.
Of course that’s what happens normally. Only one team wins the cup. Usually they have made a similar move.
Yeah but that's a pretty sizeable list when you are talking about playoff teams.
And yes NJ has the look of a team that exits early, but at the same time, they also have our number so far this year. That's not a team you should just count on playing us differently come the playoffs.
So I'd prefer to do something that's not foolishly bad value even if everyone else is doing it.
Exactly...with 20-8-10 soon to move on it is vital to reinforce the team and mentor the Kids on how to play .IMO you can't really just say "well we're not clearly the best team in the conference might as well tank it for next year"
Cuz...what happens if Boston loses some important players to injury? Carolina flames out again because their system is ass? Toronto loses in the first round again?
You don't HAVE to be the best team going into the playoffs to win the cup, you just need to survive the longest
IMO the situation the Rangers are in they need to take their shots now to some extent but I dont' think Drury is compeltely trading away the farm to do it either
But one less than we had this morning.And we still have a better first than the one we traded. You are grasping at straws
View attachment 647661
Full trade confirmed by team