Proposal: NYR - SJ again

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
2,992
2,597
I mean Ruhwedel is better than what the sharks rolled out last year yet Okhotiuk was scratched a ton.

This just feels like you didn’t actually watch Okhotiuk and sure as hell didn’t watch Addison who was a complete and utter liability night in and night out.
And Addison played 16 minutes a night (with a much more games than Zac Jones) on a playoff team in MIN in 22-23 before being traded.

You are looking at their time IN SJS (where Zac Jones would almost certainly look pretty shit as well). You can't value players retroactively like that.
 

Gecklund

Registered User
Jul 17, 2012
26,072
12,836
California
And Addison played 16 minutes a night (with a much more games than Zac Jones) on a playoff team in MIN in 22-23 before being traded.

You are looking at their time IN SJS (where Zac Jones would almost certainly look pretty shit as well). You can't value players retroactively like that.
But you can. Despite playing 16 minutes a night in MIN they were constantly looking for an improvement due to Addison’s defensive issues. Think this is one of those where you continue to move the goal posts. So like feel free to think what you want about Jones. You’re just wrong.
 

josra33

Registered User
Aug 11, 2008
5,463
5,164
What are those character flaws?

And you sound naive about Jones NHL career so far.

Impressive amount of wrong in one post.
I’m sorry but your assessment on any player west of the Mississippi is laughable at best too. Take extra care with your stones in your glass house.
 

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
2,992
2,597
But you can. Despite playing 16 minutes a night in MIN they were constantly looking for an improvement due to Addison’s defensive issues. Think this is one of those where you continue to move the goal posts. So like feel free to think what you want about Jones. You’re just wrong.
And despite playing 16 minutes a night in NYR they are literally looking for an upgrade on Zac Jones in this thread.

Calen Addison in Minnesota had an xGoals share of 51%
Zac Jones in NYR has an xGoals share of 47%

Neither of them are/were meaningful assets
 

Gecklund

Registered User
Jul 17, 2012
26,072
12,836
California
And despite playing 16 minutes a night in NYR they are literally looking for an upgrade on Zac Jones in this thread.

Calen Addison in Minnesota had an xGoals share of 51%
Zac Jones in NYR has an xGoals share of 47%

Neither of them are/were meaningful assets
Considering the OP literally said Lindgren, this is laughable bud. Like at this point you don’t even remember what you’re arguing about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: noncents

Bizz

Slacked for Mack
Oct 17, 2007
11,688
7,933
San Jose
I mean if Laf is a big embarrassing bust what is Eklund? Btw the answer is not a big embarrassing bust.

Eklund wasn't picked 1st overall and he's at least has a high chance of still being in the NHL in 4 years.

Lafreniere will be out of the NHL and in Europe by then.
 

cwede

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 1, 2010
9,972
7,909
to me this take underrates both walman as well as bystedt as a real C prospect, which the rangers don't really have.
Current NYR have Zib, Troch and Chytil at C, near-term few years are solid

NYR C pipeline has McConnell-Barker, and especially Noah Laba who has outperformed expectations both NCAA seasons, and also few long shots

no disrespect in any way to Walman's capabilities
but makes >$3+, and he can walk away in 18 months
not worth such a price to this team
 

Gecklund

Registered User
Jul 17, 2012
26,072
12,836
California
thanks for levelheaded responses Geck. is the shark board always so trolly? or do rangers fans on the main board really get riled up so easily?
Yeah no problem at all! I think the big thing is that like as a Sharks fan we are used to all of our players just getting super undervalued on the main boards. This goes back to the Jumbo Joe and Patty Marleau days. A lot of these guys in here have very intelligent arguments on the Sharks board. Think there’s something about the main boards that makes everyone’s IQ drop a bit. Also think it’s so easy to get caught up in the mudslinging.

It’s also so hard to judge actual trades. For example I wouldn’t have given up Edstrom and a first for Askarov but ya know Grier did. In the same way that I probably wouldn’t give up Bystedt for Othmann but I’m sure rangers fans would say the opposite. We all get caught up in overvaluing what we have. You can ask my fantasy sports buddies. They hate getting offers from me cause they aren’t really close ever.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,387
15,064
Folsom
Current NYR have Zib, Troch and Chytil at C, near-term few years are solid

NYR C pipeline has McConnell-Barker, and especially Noah Laba who has outperformed expectations both NCAA seasons, and also few long shots

no disrespect in any way to Walman's capabilities
but makes >$3+, and he can walk away in 18 months
not worth such a price to this team
So then what price do you feel would be worth it to trade for someone like Walman? The Sharks would move Walman if the return made sense for their future. He's pretty clearly our best defenseman and useful to help develop our young forwards but he's not going to cost a premium.
 

Grinner

Registered User
May 31, 2022
1,829
1,400
Jones is one of the most shackled talents in the league. He’s been good for a while and will thrive when he finally leaves.
How so?
A bottom paring LD isn't really a need for SJ. Especially not for a player that's playing on our top line. The Sharks are well stocked on LD prospects as well
 

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
59,428
26,018
New York
He's good enough and young enough that you hate to lose him on waivers, but not a guy you want to be playing consistent minutes too as a contender. I would have loved to keep Okhotiuk in NJD, but unfortunately there was not space on the squad, he would have been claimed off waivers when his exemption ran out, and so he had to be moved.

They, if moved, tend to be more throw in pieces that the bad teams will take a shot on by giving him minutes the good teams can't afford to.
I absolutely want him playing consistent minutes on the Rangers, a contender, this year. He’s better than virtually every 6 in the league.

He's almost 22 and hasn't been able to grab a top six or even top nine spot on the Rangers. It's probably never going to happen.
If he was on the Sharks, he’d be in the NHL. I can’t believe this has to be said. Players don’t pick who draft them.

Jones's stats says you're a liar.
The internet
I’m a liar because you read a boxscore and think you know what you’re talking about on a subject you admit you don’t have personal knowledge on?

I can’t believe this is a real argument I’m responding to.
 

Grinner

Registered User
May 31, 2022
1,829
1,400
I absolutely want him playing consistent minutes on the Rangers, a contender, this year. He’s better than virtually every 6 in the league.


If he was on the Sharks, he’d be in the NHL. I can’t believe this has to be said. Players don’t pick who draft them.


I’m a liar because you read a boxscore and think you know what you’re talking about on a subject you admit you don’t have personal knowledge on?

I can’t believe this is a real argument I’m responding to.
You're certainly full of something
 

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
59,428
26,018
New York
I mean Okhotiuk was an NHL dman because he was on the Sharks. Jones is playing on the third pair for a Stanley cup contender. Not sure if he still is actually but still. jones is getting at least the same amount of minutes as Okhotiuk did last year which is not much. Difference is in team quality.
Jones was demoted to 7D in the last week. It makes no sense to me. Not a deserved demotion. He was playing well. Laviolette prefers Mancini, who is a good rookie and I think will be a capable NHL player, but Jones is better right now. The most obvious reason why he prefers him is because he’s 5 or 6 inches taller. This is what Jones is up against.
 

CanadienShark

Registered User
Dec 18, 2012
39,773
14,318
I think the way you could paint that it is a fair trade for the Sharks is that Othmann-Bystedt is a wash and maybe even a slight edge to Othmann (slightly better pedigree over the years, but nothing huge).

Meanwhile, Walman for Jones is more of a move for fit. Walman is 28. If he’s even for real at this point, it’s probably short lived and for the end of his prime years (the next few). When the Sharks are good, he probably won’t be. Jones probably isn’t as good right now, but has shown he’s a capable bottom pair defenseman, at the very least. He moves the puck well and can run a PP. Rangers have had one of the deepest defenses in the league though and he also has the small bias working against him.

That’s even worse for contending teams because the coaches coach so safe and would sometimes rather just throw a tall guy back there who can’t play because they’re big or something (our last coach Gallant would say this stuff almost verbatim). For a team where he’s not competing with much and his size isn’t going to be scrutinized every last moment (the outlook is more about his age and potential), he could provide a good longterm fit. He’s only just turned 24 last Friday. He could be a solution for the Sharks for 5+ years as a 4-6.

I would suggest it leans a little towards the Rangers, but I don’t think this is something Sharks fans should be up in arms about. There are reasons why it’d make sense.
There's a million guys like Jones. He's a run of the mill, borderline NHLer at best. If you can find value in a trade for him elsewhere, that's fine, but he adds nothing to SJ except another in the backlog. Walman is proving to be a legit 2nd pairing guy, and (unfortunately) our best d-man. You can argue in a "pure value" sense that the trade might be fair, but that ignores it fills no needs at all for SJ. It makes us worse now and likely long term.
 

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
59,428
26,018
New York
There's a million guys like Jones. He's a run of the mill, borderline NHLer at best. If you can find value in a trade for him elsewhere, that's fine, but he adds nothing to SJ except another in the backlog. Walman is proving to be a legit 2nd pairing guy, and (unfortunately) our best d-man. You can argue in a "pure value" sense that the trade might be fair, but that ignores it fills no needs at all for SJ. It makes us worse now and likely long term.
Except, that's not true. Jones is actually a good player. He's not waiver wire trash. He'd stick on your team, and wouldn't look back. The Rangers have such a deep defense. A small guy that isn't like an Adam Fox small guy has such a tough route towards making it with the Rangers. It is what it is, but don't mistake that for that Jones is a borderline NHL'er.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QJL

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
2,992
2,597
Except, that's not true. Jones is actually a good player. He's not waiver wire trash. He'd stick on your team, and wouldn't look back. The Rangers have such a deep defense. A small guy that isn't like an Adam Fox small guy has such a tough route towards making it with the Rangers. It is what it is, but don't mistake that for that Jones is a borderline NHL'er.
Is NYR really that deep defensively tho?

You played Chad Ruhwedel like 2 games ago (over Zac Jones)
 

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
59,428
26,018
New York
Is NYR really that deep defensively tho?

You played Chad Ruhwedel like 2 games ago (over Zac Jones)
Chad Ruhwedel was given a game by the coach because he didn't want the 7th defenseman to sit for too long without playing. To that point Jones had played every game. Then again, Lindgren was set to come back, so someone had to lose their lineup spot anyway. I know Jones did, but I think he's better than Mancini right now. Coach prefers the much taller player. Shocking.

Anyway, if they preferred Ruhwedel to Jones, they could've easily waived Jones.
 

CanadienShark

Registered User
Dec 18, 2012
39,773
14,318
Except, that's not true. Jones is actually a good player. He's not waiver wire trash. He'd stick on your team, and wouldn't look back. The Rangers have such a deep defense. A small guy that isn't like an Adam Fox small guy has such a tough route towards making it with the Rangers. It is what it is, but don't mistake that for that Jones is a borderline NHL'er.
I never called him waiver wire trash, but he's at best a borderline NHLer even on a trash team like the Sharks. Long term or short term, he's got no place with SJ.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad