Good idea.I'd love to see them prove it. Go toss your money around at Eric Tulsky.
After less than 2 years....But to fire a beloved organizational figure like JD for no good reason is truly disgusting. There's something rotten behind the scenes, and it involves the JD/Gorton tandem preaching patience with an uber-young team and Dolan being the toddler tyrant asshole he's always been.
That does not make me feel confident. BOLD moves under Dolan: Fleury, Kamensky, Lindros, Bure (give a mulligan on this as he got hurt), Quintal, Lefebrve, Stevens, Ulanov, Kasparaitis, Messier reboot. Bold move that worked: Jagr.31T podcast is out, a few notes:
- Elliotte says this move had been in the works for a month, jives with what Dolan himself said.
- Says Sather played "a significant role" in this.
- Says Dolan "felt like he wasn't communicated with" regarding JD. Says Dolan wanted more communication from his senior guys.
- "Whatever Davidson and Gorton were selling, it wasn't for Dolan". Says Dolan isn't one for "building", he wants "bold" and Sather is bold.
- Says everyone is trying to define what Dolan says "was missing".
- Elliotte mentions Tochett, says he isn't sure the Rangers want Torts 2.0. Feels for Quinn.
- Wonders if JD goes back to TV. Gorton was "hurt" being let go, says people are already asking about him.
Who are the handful of best owners and worst owners in the league?
Yankees fans pine for the GMS days.Best: The ones you never hear from.
Worst: The others.
That does not make me feel confident. BOLD moves under Dolan: Fleury, Kamensky, Lindros, Bure (give a mulligan on this as he got hurt), Quintal, Lefebrve, Stevens, Ulanov, Kasparaitis, Messier reboot. Bold move that worked: Jagr.
Not to get off topic, but actually, in football it does work. Same with Saquon Barkley. When you are relying on the big play and your yards per play look like: 1, 2, 1, 59, 3, -1, 0, 4, 1, , 1, 3, 2, 1, -2, -1, 15, 20, 1, 0, -1...... It does not allow a team to sustain drives, leads to a lot of 3 and outs and keeps your defense on the field. This however, is more on the OLine than the RB. Hence, why I take the strong OL with a mediocre RB over a mediocre OL with a great RB any day of the week and twice on Sunday.I hate when people do that.
The one that really got me to hate when people do that wasn't even from hockey:
If you take away Barry Sanders long runs his ypc is low because he got stopped for a loss too many times. Yeah duh that's not the way that works, not every player can be Curtis Martin where every run of his was 4 yards. Anyway I digress as usual.
This board will be torn apart by the DeAngelo Apologists and the Dolan Apologists. Probably a big overlap as well?![]()
Gorton was AGM under O'Donnell and became the interim GM during the 2006 off-season when the latter was fired. He really was only the GM because Bruins couldn't hire Chiarelli (who Jacobs loved) to replace O'Donnell until later in the summer. d Gorton initially remained on as AGM but was later fired because Chiarelli wanted to have one of "his" guys in that position.Something I havent heard mentioned is isn't this familiar to Gorton in Bos? Rebuild almost done and he gets fired? Wonder if they saw a lot of the same inadequacies over in Bos and realized he wouldn't be the guy to get things over the top.
Sather's name is on the letter. I have to believe he can still see the forrest through the trees.
I wonder if Sather can placate Dolan by pushing for a trade for more toughness and a new coach.
Unfortunately Nash was the exact B-type personality that this team did not need at the time. Great talent but he was just happy to be here. I say this because it goes back to execution again. Need a highly skilled player, sought out the wrong one and traded assets to get him.2) Any move may be more of a "Nash-like" trade—where the team is willing to move some pieces outside of what is decided is the core (presumably at this point I think we're talking Lafreniere, Miller, Kakko and Fox). I also don't see a move to deal a young top six guy for two role players (which is what the Amonte trade was).
Which was a result of him going for a cup and failing. Yes all we can do is hope but my confidence is low and I'm not going to delude myself into thinking that Dolan is a rational person and Glen Sather saw the light in his mid 70s.I can only hope he realized that his letter was necessary in the first place because this team when years without first round picks
See I don't give a mulligan on Bure because it's the thought process behind the trade that was the failure. We were not a healthy Bure away from becoming a cup contender. I have no problem when something doesn't work out (shit happens) but the sound logic has to be there in beginning.Bure (give a mulligan on this as he got hurt),
"Honestly does anyone think any player “protects” any other player? I just don’t see how that’s remotely possible but I’m open to being convinced."
I'm just answering your question. it's an instance.
but yeah, if Chara was a Ranger Wednesday night and he was on the ice when Wilson attacked Buch would he have gotten his hands on Panarin next or would Chara have arrived in time?
otoh I don't think Chara being on the ice would have stopped Wilson from assaulting Buch. Wilson might be showing CTE symptoms already.
I mean protect them from the sort of thing Wilson does, not protect them from scripted fights that players already don’t have to participate in. Ultimately, Chara or no, Smith could drop the gloves and Eller could skate away and be protected by the refs.
But you don’t have to be Wilson, Reeves, etc to hurt someone in a hockey game if you’re willing to not care about them and take a suspension.I liken it to the Cold War arms race. The point of a deterrent is to show the other side that you have a nuclear option just like they do. It would make the other side think at least about allowing their psycho to run wild. At least have a bluff that they must call.
When I watch Panarin and Zibanejad and Strome all doing magical shit, I'm always sort of left wondering, will we ever be really good while they're still doing this? It's like being a Mets fan and watching deGrom and having the sinking feeling that you're watching a guy waste his prime because the team can't get it's shit together. I'm not saying that the Rangers, it's just my fear.I have tried to express my concerns since Trouba was acquired, and failed to summarize it as well as this. I'm not saying I'm right, but this is the fear. Happy to be wrong.
You haven’t seen SHIT....Darkest day of the franchise since I’ve been watching for sure. (2008/2009)
But you don’t have to be Wilson, Reeves, etc to hurt someone in a hockey game if you’re willing to not care about them and take a suspension.
Bless your heartDarkest day of the franchise since I’ve been watching for sure. (2008/2009)
Spoiled by Steve Howe, Danny Tartabull and Mel Hall.Yankees fans pine for the GMS days.
Darkest day of the franchise since I’ve been watching for sure. (2008/2009)
My point is if you’re not trying to intentionally hurt someone, there is no check for someone who is. The threat of a fight he can turtle out of or the refs will break up if it doesn’t go his way is not going to stop him from doing anything at all.I don't condone intentionally hurting someone. You have to show teeth, have to show there's a threat element. The goal is that both sides do not push the nuke button. But in the case of Wilson, Laviolette should feel there's enough of a deterrence or a threat to have to remind Wilson to keep himself in check.
Try to make logic of an illogical situation with an irrational owner. So outside of the statement and the potential drama inside the organization around it there are two tangible subjects that may have made Dolan want a change.
TdA situation. I don't want to bring up this dead horse discussion of was it right vs wrong. I want to point out that perhaps Dolan didn't agree with the decision either at the time or over time. I'm sure JD and Gorts told Dolan the plan and at the time Dolan trusted JD and Gorts. JD and Gorts probably presented that they could "live" without TdA. In the end falling short, perhaps in Dolan's mind he thinks they could have used TdA especially with the injuries at the end. At the very least, I'm sure he wasn't happy paying TdA not to play (although he has swallowed paying for players like Redden who's services were no longer rendered with the team).
Playoff bubble feedback from JD and Gorts was "we are concerned about the lack of grit on the team" and the solution they assembled still didn't address this issue enough. One could easily argue the cap circumstances this year and we have much more flexbility this off season. If Dolan lost trust because of how they handled this issue last year, maybe he doesn't trust their ability to actually address it.
My point is if you’re not trying to intentionally hurt someone, there is no check for someone who is. The threat of a fight he can turtle out of or the refs will break up if it doesn’t go his way is not going to stop him from doing anything at all.