rangers1314
Registered User
31 Thoughts.I'm sorry but which podcast is this?
31 Thoughts.I'm sorry but which podcast is this?
Elliot Friedman's podcast 31 Thoughts.I'm sorry but which podcast is this?
Sure, but Smith isn’t exactly Tom Wilson, and Chara isn’t going to materialize mid game flow to stop Wilson from checking someone in the headIn the Monday game before all the crazy stuff Smith after a whistle approached Eller with ill intent but thought better of it when Chara arrived and got between them.
31T podcast is out, a few notes:
- Elliotte says this move had been in the works for a month, jives with what Dolan himself said.
- Says Sather played "a significant role" in this.
- Says Dolan "felt like he wasn't communicated with" regarding JD. Says Dolan wanted more communication from his senior guys.
- "Whatever Davidson and Gorton were selling, it wasn't for Dolan". Says Dolan isn't one for "building", he wants "bold" and Sather is bold.
- Says everyone is trying to define what Dolan says "was missing".
- Elliotte mentions Tochett, says he isn't sure the Rangers want Torts 2.0. Feels for Quinn.
- Wonders if JD goes back to TV. Gorton was "hurt" being let go, says people are already asking about him.
Try to make logic of an illogical situation with an irrational owner. So outside of the statement and the potential drama inside the organization around it there are two tangible subjects that may have made Dolan want a change.
TdA situation. I don't want to bring up this dead horse discussion of was it right vs wrong. I want to point out that perhaps Dolan didn't agree with the decision either at the time or over time. I'm sure JD and Gorts told Dolan the plan and at the time Dolan trusted JD and Gorts. JD and Gorts probably presented that they could "live" without TdA. In the end falling short, perhaps in Dolan's mind he thinks they could have used TdA especially with the injuries at the end. At the very least, I'm sure he wasn't happy paying TdA not to play (although he has swallowed paying for players like Redden who's services were no longer rendered with the team).
Playoff bubble feedback from JD and Gorts was "we are concerned about the lack of grit on the team" and the solution they assembled still didn't address this issue enough. One could easily argue the cap circumstances this year and we have much more flexbility this off season. If Dolan lost trust because of how they handled this issue last year, maybe he doesn't trust their ability to actually address it.
Sure, but Smith isn’t exactly Tom Wilson, and Chara isn’t going to materialize mid game flow to stop Wilson from checking someone in the head
Try to make logic of an illogical situation with an irrational owner. So outside of the statement and the potential drama inside the organization around it there are two tangible subjects that may have made Dolan want a change.
TdA situation. I don't want to bring up this dead horse discussion of was it right vs wrong. I want to point out that perhaps Dolan didn't agree with the decision either at the time or over time. I'm sure JD and Gorts told Dolan the plan and at the time Dolan trusted JD and Gorts. JD and Gorts probably presented that they could "live" without TdA. In the end falling short, perhaps in Dolan's mind he thinks they could have used TdA especially with the injuries at the end. At the very least, I'm sure he wasn't happy paying TdA not to play (although he has swallowed paying for players like Redden who's services were no longer rendered with the team).
Playoff bubble feedback from JD and Gorts was "we are concerned about the lack of grit on the team" and the solution they assembled still didn't address this issue enough. One could easily argue the cap circumstances this year and we have much more flexbility this off season. If Dolan lost trust because of how they handled this issue last year, maybe he doesn't trust their ability to actually address it.
I mean protect them from the sort of thing Wilson does, not protect them from scripted fights that players already don’t have to participate in. Ultimately, Chara or no, Smith could drop the gloves and Eller could skate away and be protected by the refs."Honestly does anyone think any player “protects” any other player? I just don’t see how that’s remotely possible but I’m open to being convinced."
I'm just answering your question. it's an instance.
but yeah, if Chara was a Ranger Wednesday night and he was on the ice when Wilson attacked Buch would he have gotten his hands on Panarin next or would Chara have arrived in time?
otoh I don't think Chara being on the ice would have stopped Wilson from assaulting Buch. Wilson might be showing CTE symptoms already.
I'm no Dolan apologist. I can say I've seen him at not so flattering booze induced happiness. I can also say he certainly appeared to be a happy guy when I met him. Always smiling and polite at different Long Island area hot spots. Not some brooding mental case.
He's no rocket scientist either.
But no doubt in my mind that Messier, Graves, Slats, maybe Orts, some scouts etc have his ear and respect.
Supposedly there is a very good relationship between him and King Henrik. Bet that buyout rubbed just him a bit.
They see a "culture issue ". I see perimeter play, baby poop soft decision making along the wall, and short of Kreider, unscreened opposing goalies, especially against the divisions better teams. In front of or net is better than last year but still woefully unintimidating to set camp in.
The Dolans fired Neil Smith and hired Slats. Jimmy Boy stayed out of Glenn's business for almost 20 years. I'm sure Slats had all say in his successor.
If an owner comes in once every 20 years and cleans house for internal reasons that I'm sure are many ( to him) , I personally am not gonna rag on a guy for listening to his most trusted advisors.
I was a big Gorts fan and grew up with a painted JD mask that my dad designed for me. But this team has foxhole issues. Some great individual pieces, but getting ugly and dirty to grind out a win, let alone a series doesn't look like its in this teams leaders DNA. Right now.
Drury got hired to put some teeth into this tiger cub.
That's how I perceived Dolans comments and TO ME, Glenn Sather seemed quite comfortable with this move as well.
Remember when this board collectively did a WTF when Gorton declared that Tony wasn't playing one more game in the sweater and we all said he just killed any leverage he had? Maybe that irked Dolan as much as it irked us.
There was definitely tension between the owner and the FO, if there is one fact to take away right now.
This is playing out like a Shyamalayan movie. You didn't see the big twist coming, but looking back, the signs were all there.
Other people have already pointed out the many signs, but how about the lack of a captain this whole time? It's been "leadership" by committee. There is an easygoing, devil-may-care-about-losing-or-winning attitude in that room, and a pacifist showing on the ice.
If you're Dolan, wouldn't you be concerned when it's your $81.5 million investment who has to be the one to jump into real, immiment, physical harm to help out a teammate?
I'm no Dolan apologist. I can say I've seen him at not so flattering booze induced happiness. I can also say he certainly appeared to be a happy guy when I met him. Always smiling and polite at different Long Island area hot spots. Not some brooding mental case.
He's no rocket scientist either.
But no doubt in my mind that Messier, Graves, Slats, maybe Orts, some scouts etc have his ear and respect.
Supposedly there is a very good relationship between him and King Henrik. Bet that buyout rubbed just him a bit.
They see a "culture issue ". I see perimeter play, baby poop soft decision making along the wall, and short of Kreider, unscreened opposing goalies, especially against the divisions better teams. In front of or net is better than last year but still woefully unintimidating to set camp in.
The Dolans fired Neil Smith and hired Slats. Jimmy Boy stayed out of Glenn's business for almost 20 years. I'm sure Slats had all say in his successor.
If an owner comes in once every 20 years and cleans house for internal reasons that I'm sure are many ( to him) , I personally am not gonna rag on a guy for listening to his most trusted advisors.
I was a big Gorts fan and grew up with a painted JD mask that my dad designed for me. But this team has foxhole issues. Some great individual pieces, but getting ugly and dirty to grind out a win, let alone a series doesn't look like its in this teams leaders DNA. Right now.
Drury got hired to put some teeth into this tiger cub.
That's how I perceived Dolans comments and TO ME, Glenn Sather seemed quite comfortable with this move as well.
Remember when this board collectively did a WTF when Gorton declared that Tony wasn't playing one more game in the sweater and we all said he just killed any leverage he had? Maybe that irked Dolan as much as it irked us.
There was definitely tension between the owner and the FO, if there is one fact to take away right now.
This is playing out like a Shyamalayan movie. You didn't see the big twist coming, but looking back, the signs were all there.
Other people have already pointed out the many signs, but how about the lack of a captain this whole time? It's been "leadership" by committee. There is an easygoing, devil-may-care-about-losing-or-winning attitude in that room, and a pacifist showing on the ice.
If you're Dolan, wouldn't you be concerned when it's your $81.5 million investment who has to be the one to jump into real, immiment, physical harm to help out a teammate?
Also saw that Drury is going to be relying more on analytics and hiring more stats geeks to put in front of him. That should make a lot of people happy.
If Drury fires Quinn, is a proven analytics coach on the radar? Who are the big analytics head coaches in the league now? Or are most assistant coaches the analytics gurus?
What's interesting to me is that some of the moves we're talking about from the last few years --- are patented Sather moves or connected to him. Buyouts, lingering contracts that we struggle to move, etc. None of this is new. And a lot of it is coming off.
These guys were Sather's hand-picked replacements. The structure was partly designed by him. He signed off and was involved on every step of what we just jettisoned. There is no way to separate Sather from any of this. His DNA is all over it.
Yep ok, now I'm going back to my initial reaction and saying the Rangers may be royally f***ed. f***ity f*** f*** f***ed. I can live with Drury in control and Sather the buffer but if Sather is more active in the game!?!? We've seen that movie already and I'm not expecting an Academy award for the sequal.
If Carp's article is true and Dolan was livid that we didn't add at THIS deadline for a playoff push then that is huge cause for concern. This was not the year to make a big splash for a playoff push. For an upgrade to help now and the future? Sure, which is what Gorton was trying to get done. So if the Rangers are in a wild card spot next year, don't be surprised if we see an Amonte type trade except the Rangers wouldn't be in position of the '94 team.
Remember Godfather Sather's "boldness" brought us guys like a 'on his last legs' Lindros, Redden, Gomez, Drury the player, and Lowe/Trottier/Muckler the coaches and resulted in absolutely ZERO cups during his tenure. Has he weaseled his way back in because he thinks he's the one to bring it across the finish line? Maybe we'll also get a reprise of him firing a coach mid-season and taking over behind the bench.
I resemble that remark lol. Oh God and Quinn too! Ban me now!This board will be torn apart by the DeAngelo Apologists and the Dolan Apologists. Probably a big overlap as well?![]()