Nice mental gymnastics.
His contact is 7.45M x 7 - period.
It might work out, it might not.
I'm glad that Ottawa locked up Stutzle when they did, but he has/had accomplished more at a much more valuable position.
If you compare ELC production for 1st year eligible players, Stutzle was tracking like a sure bet. Laf, not so much.
That being said, I think and hope it works out but for Laf but I would much prefer Stutzle on his contract.
It's not mental gymnastics.
The premise of my post, which was made weeks ago, was that UFA years command a higher premium, and an 8 year (the rumoured length at the time) contract buys up significantly more UFA years than some of the other 8M contracts that we have seen handed out right off of an ELC..
This was validated today when it was reported that the AAV was lower than originally expected because the Rangers opted to buy one less UFA year. AKA, UFA years cost more to buy than RFA years.
The point of adding both contracts together was to give a visual illustration of the difference in value between RFA and UFA years.
I'm surprised I have to defend the notion that agents and players put a higher value on buying up UFA years. And that s contract with more UFA years isn't an apples to apples comparison to a contract with less. I assumed it was common knowledge.