I guess you aren't looking at it from Buffalo point of view.If they are rebuilding (again) why would they take players older than Eichel and less talented? If Rangers think they can win adding Eichel but giving up blue chip prospects would be the ONLY way for them to g
f course then the cap becomes an issue etc.Lets just say we aren't good trading partners and leave it like that lol.
I have looked at it from Sabes' side, as well as NYR.
1. Math does not lie. It is not only the extensive depth that multiple blue chip elcs mean to generate strong depth throughout the lineup which = valid counterstrategy to going w/one more super stud --- which unlike depth carries extra risk of putting all eggs in one basket, It is also elcs = downward salary pressure which = cost control which = long term roster flexibility.
2. I have suggested they consider sacrificing Dahlin for signif improvement that would reasonably good chance to keep Eichel.
3. But even if we abandon that and insist on looking at JE, Sabes need to realize they can get huge return, including overpay, but are not getting that in their choice of currency -- that will principally be by the suitor. Why?
because:
- usually not profitable [enough] for team to gut itself to add one guy
- if everyone is aware impetus to deal JE is being caused by Jack himself, then suitors can use that to leverage vs BUF.
4. As to "If they are rebuilding (again) why would they take players older than Eichel and less talented?", what you are not acknowledging is the total picture. You are implying these are super short term over the hill guys in an effort to swindle for Jack. That is mostly false and this is not a 1:1 where the main guy going back is a HoF great type like Malkin, in his 30s w/lots of mileage.
You are getting 2 guys mid 20s, Buch and Strome, who = 5 ish yrs shelf life or more.
You are getting Zib who is late 20s but that is immediate signif add; once he loses all covid rust that will be a premium piece whether you keep or flip him.
So while this is not the 1:1 or so Sabes are seeking -- and again, you are not getting Heiskanen or similar straight up --- it is enough
quantity add to justify consideration. You should do the best overall move which depends on competitive bids.
We are pressing a guy like Buch instead of a guy like Kravtsov b'c we prefer K's upside, and that he can also play pivot, whereas B is either W, but only a W. We are also doing that b'c we cannot afford Buch long term going forward. That is what rest of NHL has to understand as to who is available and why.
Finally, it is a fallacy to think NYR can just fork over bluest chip elcs.
We are not there yet.
If we listen to me, and upgrade our picks situation, and utilize our newly discovered ability to draft well, THEN after another couple of seasons, THEN we will have so much young talent on both the roster and in the system that dealing what is then an excess of blue chips can be considered.
But right now, that is not the case.
The media is pushing that to sell papers.
Other clubs are allowing it to see what this does to put pressure on Sabes to make a move, and if/when suitors do not up bids, Sabes will get screwed by being forced to take less [presumes Eich will force a trade, so keeping not an option].
but bern is calling it as he sees it, honestly.
tell it like it is, let your conscience be your guide.