Evilhomer
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2019
- 6,445
- 6,346
Correct.Future playoff outcomes aren't dependent on past playoff outcomes.
Correct.Future playoff outcomes aren't dependent on past playoff outcomes.
Your medical opinion?Not picks & prospects but an actual hockey trade, as for Marner you’ve got no control over that at all
This folks is Stockholm Syndrome
From listening to all the insiders and Tre, it sounded like Nylander never moved off 11+mx8. Was not taking 3-4m less than Matty. Tre looked at all his options including trading him and letting him walk and figured signing 88 was his best option. Luke Fox thinks he did not have the stomach to try what Yzerman tried with Stamkos after losing Gaudreau. What I got from it was Willie does not get you a top dman and once GMs learned what Willie wanted, they hung up the phone.It leaves a bitter taste in my mouth that we had so much GM drama going into key contract/trade needs this offseason. I feel like Dubas just signs Nylander for 10 mil pre season.
To replace Brodie and GiordanoWhy would we trade for a dman when we have Benoit?
They aren’t dependent on past outcomes, sure, but both past outcomes and future outcomes are dependent on a lot of the same underlying factors. We use past outcomes to estimate these factors and make predictions about the future. So yes, past outcomes are relevant.We could have faced a Stanley Cup finalist!.... Just like we have in 4 of the last 5 years.
Rounds are pretty arbitrary, especially in this format. We have plenty of experience in long series against top tier teams/performances. Would change nothing.
Why would it? Future playoff outcomes aren't dependent on past playoff outcomes. We stick with the core because it benefits us to do so.
We could have faced much easier situations like many other teams and reached the cup final one of these years, but that wouldn't do anything to help the team now, and without the cup, all it is really worth is the extra month of fan entertainment in the moment.
They aren’t dependent on past outcomes, sure, but both past outcomes and future outcomes are dependent on a lot of the same underlying factors. We use past outcomes to estimate these factors and make predictions about the future. So yes, past outcomes are relevant.
I get the whole small sample sizes and good teams thing, and I agree it’s not enough to say we’ll never have success with this core. But certainly we’d all feel more confident if all of the players did step up and have past success, rather than not? I think that’s was the original poster was trying to imply.
I think yesterday's outcome, regardless of dollar amount, was always going to be the outcome, as it will almost certainly be with Marner. Fans will get 5 years of watching one of the best teams in the league, and then the situation can be re-assessed when Matthews new contracts ends.From listening to all the insiders and Tre, it sounded like Nylander never moved off 11+mx8. Was not taking 3-4m less than Matty. Tre looked at all his options including trading him and letting him walk and figured signing 88 was his best option. Luke Fox thinks he did not have the stomach to try what Yzerman tried with Stamkos after losing Gaudreau. What I got from it was Willie does not get you a top dman and once GMs learned what Willie wanted, they hung up the phone.
At this point I will take a decent playoff run, anything ffsJesus Christ greedy much? Give me one cup and a decade of destitute and you'll still never be able to wipe the smug grin off my face!
I think yesterday's outcome, regardless of dollar amount, was always going to be the outcome, as it will almost certainly be with Marner. Fans will get 5 years of watching one of the best teams in the league, and then the situation can be re-assessed when Matthews new contracts ends.
You too Michael.Settle down, Paul...
I think they know they need to move one of the core 4 for a top dman. I now think they will tread water for a year and get that dman July 1, 2025 using JT's money. Hopefully JT will resign for under $4mx2 rather than walk for nothing.I think yesterday's outcome, regardless of dollar amount, was always going to be the outcome, as it will almost certainly be with Marner. Fans will get 5 years of watching one of the best teams in the league, and then the situation can be re-assessed when Matthews new contracts ends.
It's possible we gun hard for Hanifin this summer and really scrape the bottom of the barrel next season to ensure we have a player like him locked up for our d core.I think they know they need to move one of the core 4 for a top dman. I now think they will tread water for a year and get that dman July 1, 2025 using JT's money. Hopefully JT will resign for under $4mx2 rather than walk for nothing.
One of the best? If you are able to ignore that we've had 7 consecutive sub .500 playoffs, then sure I guess. Not me though, I refuse to drink the koolaid.I think yesterday's outcome, regardless of dollar amount, was always going to be the outcome, as it will almost certainly be with Marner. Fans will get 5 years of watching one of the best teams in the league, and then the situation can be re-assessed when Matthews new contracts ends.
Why would he do that though? I mean just look at his teammates, Bertuzzi makes 5.5 million and had 18 points. JT has 34 points, he's a much more valuable player, none of the big stars are giving the team a break, why would JT sign for millions less than someone else would pay him?I think they know they need to move one of the core 4 for a top dman. I now think they will tread water for a year and get that dman July 1, 2025 using JT's money. Hopefully JT will resign for under $4mx2 rather than walk for nothing.
They remind me of the Cowboys and Jays. Good regular season team and early playoff exit.One of the best? If you are able to ignore that we've had 7 consecutive sub .500 playoffs, then sure I guess. Not me though, I refuse to drink the koolaid.
JT could but who knows what JT is in two years? If he wants closer to Bertuzzi money you have to let him walk because most of the money has to go towards the D. If we give him $3m, we would have had him for 8x$10m. LOL.One of the best? If you are able to ignore that we've had 7 consecutive sub .500 playoffs, then sure I guess. Not me though, I refuse to drink the koolaid.
Why would he do that though? I mean just look at his teammates, Bertuzzi makes 5.5 million and had 18 points. JT has 34 points, he's a much more valuable player, none of the big stars are giving the team a break, why would JT sign for millions less than someone else would pay him?
Let them pay him then. Good riddance. He is riding the coat tails of our star wingers really f***ing hard and getting insanely optimal ice time including PP1 where he has no business being this season.One of the best? If you are able to ignore that we've had 7 consecutive sub .500 playoffs, then sure I guess. Not me though, I refuse to drink the koolaid.
Why would he do that though? I mean just look at his teammates, Bertuzzi makes 5.5 million and had 18 points. JT has 34 points, he's a much more valuable player, none of the big stars are giving the team a break, why would JT sign for millions less than someone else would pay him?
It is weird that the Leafs have the current active playoff streak right now.They remind me of the Cowboys and Jays. Good regular season team and early playoff exit.
JT could but who knows what JT is in two years? If he wants closer Bertuzzi money you have to let him walk. If we give him $3m, we would have had him for 8x$10m. LOL.
JT could but who knows what JT is in two years? If he wants closer to Bertuzzi money you have to let him walk because most of the money has to go towards the D. If we give him $3m, we would have had him for 8x$10m. LOL.
Sure, whatever. All I'm saying is that as of today, he's still a very good player, much more valuable than Bertuzzi (not to pick on him, just one example), and of course we'll re-evaluate what he is when the time comes, but I see no reason to expect him to sign for a big discount.Let them pay him then. Good riddance. He is riding the coat tails of our star wingers really f***ing hard and getting insanely optimal ice time including PP1 where he has no business being this season.
It's not even outlier season at this point, it's an outlier 37 games, not even half a season.A common thing (mistake) in the nhl is for players to have outlier contract years and getting paid for that outlier career high season.
Is there literally ANY example of that player staying at that outlier pace in the following seasons?
Every single solitary example I think of the overpaid player immediately regresses back to their career average or worse.
We'll see when the games matter but I bet Tuzzi shows him up two fold in the playoffs. Tuzzi almost had half the points Tavares has in the playoffs for us in 31 games in a single series last year.Sure, whatever. All I'm saying is that as of today, he's still a very good player, much more valuable than Bertuzzi (not to pick on him, just one example), and of course we'll re-evaluate what he is when the time comes, but I see no reason to expect him to sign for a big discount.
What a loser mentality. Oh geez it's too hard to win a cup might as well accept losing in the 1st rd every year with a bunch of overpaid schmucks that disappear every spring.So tired of people b*tching about contracts. This is the best collection of home grown talent the Leafs have ever had. Can we just enjoy it?
Let’s face it there are 32 teams now, Bettman probably won’t stop raking in expansion fees until it hits 40. Every new team that comes in drops the chances of any one team winning a Cup. We just saw an expansion team come in and take a Cup away from a longer tenured team. Its the reality of the league now. No matter what Willy or whoever gets paid the odds of the Leafs winning are slim just by virtue of the size of the league and parity. I want a Cup as much as anybody but if it doesn’t happen at least I can appreciate the careers of Matthews and Willy and Mitch and Reilly all these guys we drafted ourselves and are lucky to have. That counts for something too.
Playoff outcomes are dependent on internal and external factors. External factors are always changing by quite a bit, and there are significant fluctuations with internal factors, especially from year to year as rosters change and players evolve. The primary causes of our unsatisfactory outcomes have been external factors, and even internally, the core is far from our primary issue. Most people who attempt to estimate the factors that led to an outcome get it wrong, and also overestimate the extent that the factors remain constant, and as a result, make counterproductive suggestions and bad predictions about our future. And quite frankly, many people here fail to look beyond the surface outcomes at all.They aren’t dependent on past outcomes, sure, but both past outcomes and future outcomes are dependent on a lot of the same underlying factors. We use past outcomes to estimate these factors and make predictions about the future.
Tavares is a great net front presence . Not sure who you think is replacing him there but it sure a hell wont be the 3 amigos . Pp works because they have rolls .same reason last year they put O'Rielly on pp1. Without those kind of guys they just pass around the outside .Let them pay him then. Good riddance. He is riding the coat tails of our star wingers really f***ing hard and getting insanely optimal ice time including PP1 where he has no business being this season.
He has 2 goals in 37 games. Knies or Bert could do that role while actually screening the goalie and not standing to the side trying to get a tip on it when Auston and Willy can snipe corners.Tavares is a great net front presence . Not sure who you think is replacing him there but it sure a hell wont be the 3 amigos . Pp works because they have rolls .same reason last year they put O'Rielly on pp1. Without those kind of guys they just pass around the outside .
You can argue his salary being worth it .