I wonder if they'll eat together.I imagine things will progress and we'll get some more information when the players come back to town for Marners wedding.
I wonder if they'll eat together.I imagine things will progress and we'll get some more information when the players come back to town for Marners wedding.
Same room, seperate tables.I wonder if they'll eat together.
Yes, average salary is $7.5, but if we're talking about cap hit, it's $6.96, as your insert shows.Its off normal a little off because of the holdout, but his actual earnings are 6 years & $45 mil = $7.5 average. Willy only cares about the money not the AAV or average anyways.
View attachment 728781
Indisputable, if we're being honest.You can say it but it isn't really true. You can't retroactively change a contract. He signed a contract that would end in 5.6 years. He didn't play for 40% of the first season. You can't really compare properly hence the 7.5.
20 bucks an hour ain't the same as 20 in 36 minutes
Willy will see if Matthews goes up for seconds before he decides to.Same room, seperate tables.
They'll each get their own trough.
It is the total amount that matters to a player not the AAV. The AAV matters for the team to build a roster that is competitive while being cap compliant.
If you have trouble understanding this simple concept, I don't know what else to say to you.
His cap hit is 6.96M because he got paid over $10M in the year he held out. He stands to make $45M over 6 years which is 7.5M per year. It was just some accounting issue with the holdout that made the first year take up so much cap.His cap hit is $6.96M not $7.5.
He did not get paid over 10m in the first year.His cap hit is 6.96M because he got paid over $10M in the year he held out.
He will make 41.77m over these 6 seasons, not 45m.He stands to make $45M over 6 years
His cap hit in his first year was the same 6.96m.It was just some accounting issue with the holdout that made the first year take up so much cap.
All your logic requires that he never gets another contract after the 7 or 8, to make your math come out.
What if he signs a one year deal at $10M, and then with the higher cap and better stats (thanks to not playing on the second line with John Turtlevaris), signs for 8 more years at $12M?
You can keep saying that until you’re blue in the face, it won’t make it a fact. Both the total amount and term are a factor. I mean, we’ve literally seen example after example of players signing shorter term deals this summer, banking on their future earning capacity under a higher cap.
Yes, obviously there’s a different weight to guaranteed money vs potential earning capacity in the future. Things like age, health, future cap level, will all be a part of the equation. But it’s still something the players are undeniably considering when they’re evaluating a contract.
Marner has played with the better players and better situation in every year arguably but the first and nylander some how carried the team with galchenyuk and kerfoot like for real? Marners never been demoted to pp2 even at times when he’s deserved too like come on my friendHis contract was for 6 seasons at 6.96m cap hit, and he's making 41.77m, not 45m. Nylander has played over 91% of the possible games on his contract,, which is pretty good.
It's not so much my opinion as it is just fact.
Nylander has not been the better playoff performer. Nylander has outproduced Marner in 1 out of our 8 playoff series, for the record, and even in that one series where Nylander had easier situations to produce and an inflated OISH% while Marner played with two injured players who hit a playoff-leading number of posts in one round, Nylander simultaneously gave up so much more defensively that he still ended up with a worse on-ice goal differential than Marner.
I imagine things will progress and we'll get some more information when the players come back to town for Marners wedding.
Understandable but I think from nylanders perspective he took far less than marner got on his last contract I think his position on 10 mil being that marner got it on his first post elc isn’t outlandish and I would dare say very understandable the gap between marner and nylander is a lot closer than the gap between marner and matthewsBeing the smartest kid in a remedial class doesn't mean you're entitled to a 43% bump in pay.
I've heard some interesting Nylander stories regarding that.I think even with Marner going first this time Willy will stubbornly stay single until he sees Matthews bride to be and then marry someone his agent says is 10% hotter.
fan590 doing some Nylander Trade musings.
for whatever it's worth:
More pigeons. Put bieska on the radio at least .These people should not have a job.
Are they Ranger fans at least?
We take back a cap dump in both trades and give up the best piece.
He did not get paid over 10m in the first year.
He will make 41.77m over these 6 seasons, not 45m.
His cap hit in his first year was the same 6.96m.
Acknowledging it would be admitting that Dubas caved.View attachment 728834
He was made whole when he signed the deal and didn't miss out on a single dollar. I really don't understand why this is so hard to comprehend. There was a rule that he had to take a bigger chunk in the 1st yr because of the holdout. It says right there that he signed a 6yr $45M deal.
Yeah - that's what you have to do to give a player an agreed upon cap hit and salary when you're signing them mid-season, due to how cap hits accumulate to their total throughout the year. That's not what he actually got or cost the team.
these are not rumors. What are you talking about?More pigeons. Put bieska on the radio at least .
These rumors are pathetic
Correct, but saying his cap hit is $7.5 is wrong.His cap hit is 6.96M because he got paid over $10M in the year he held out. He stands to make $45M over 6 years which is 7.5M per year. It was just some accounting issue with the holdout that made the first year take up so much cap.
Are you talking about his value now, or over the next 7 or 8 years? Make up your mind, and talk about one of the other, but stop confusing the two.Nylander can do whatever he wants as a UFA, he has earned that right. The question isn't what Nylander will or can get; the question is should Leafs bendover to that AAV? Can the Leafs still have competitive roster if they do?
I say they don't!
If Nylander wants to risk injury or a bad luck season; by signing only 1 yr deal; to get more later (same with Matthews); its their choice.
As management group LEAFS should not bendover is what I am saying
Nowhere did I say that Nylander at age 34 (7 yr deal) and/or age 35 (8 yr deal); will not get another contract. How do you even value that contract? What will his production/output/play would be at that age? I cannot see future man; I am not even going to guesstimate what that value may be.
The only thing open for discussion is what is the value now; what Nylander can potentially get as a UFA if he walks (max 7 yr deal); and what is a shorter term deal (Willy assumes the risk of injury or bad seasons(s)); what does that look like from Leafs POV Vs what he may get as a UFA
If you think someone other team in the league is going to offer Nylander 10 AAV for 1 yr or 2 yr, or 3 yr or 4yr; well good for you I guess.... I don't think anyone in the league is going to offer Nylander 10 AAV as a UFA
It also says right there that his cap hit is $6,962,366. I really don't understand why this is so hard to comprehend.View attachment 728834
He was made whole when he signed the deal and didn't miss out on a single dollar. I really don't understand why this is so hard to comprehend. There was a rule that he had to take a bigger chunk in the 1st yr because of the holdout. It says right there that he signed a 6yr $45M deal.