Gary Nylund
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2013
- 31,684
- 25,517
I've never bought into this idea that 7 year deals can be compared to 8 year deals based on total dollars alone, makes no sense to me at all.11M over 7 years is 77M dollars
10M over the 8 years we can give him is 80M dollars, that deal will also be bonus laden
I like Nylander but there's no way in hell he deserves 11M+, he's never even cracked 90 points ffs
Matthews didn't crack 90 points last season and didn't "deserve" to become the highest paid player in the league. Marner got an 11 million dollar contract based on potential, he didn't "deserve" that either, especially not for less than max term. Do you think Nylander would be happy to once again, be the only one of the big 3 who isn't getting overpaid, or at the very least getting paid at the absolute top end of whatever his salary range might be?
UFA's get paid whatever the market decides, what anyone "deserves" has nothing to do with it. He looks to be on his way to having his best season ever, that would be the third year in a row that he's done that so hard to write it off as a fluke either and unless he drops off in a big way, I'm pretty sure there will be teams offering him more than 11 million.
When we signed JT, he was coming off a season where he put up 84 points, he had 66 points in 77 games the year previous. The salary cap has been relatively stagnant but it's still higher than it was back then. Nylander had 87 points last season and is on pace for what, 115 or something like that? I'm sure he'll slow down at some point but he'll probably still finish with 100+ points so maybe he you can help me understand why you think he'd settle for any less than JT got paid 6 years ago because I don't see it. Don't forget that he was willing to sit out for months before caving last time around and this time he has leverage that he didn't have back then so the chances of him signing a contract he is not 100% happy with are zero.