Drytoast
Registered User
- Sep 27, 2017
- 6,602
- 4,819
Probably whats gonna happen.f*** it. Give him $10+m and the fans can enjoy regular season hockey and MLSEL can sell more jerseys.
He has great hair.
Probably whats gonna happen.f*** it. Give him $10+m and the fans can enjoy regular season hockey and MLSEL can sell more jerseys.
I wouldn't lump these 3 together. The numbers have been posted many times and unlike the other two, Nylander's production has not dropped off in the playoffs. As far as "playing well", again, lumping 3 players together is a really bad idea and I'll just leave it at that.I don't think there is a secret formula to winning the cup, but at least in recent years, all of Nylander/Marner/Matthews are PPG and playing well, the myth that they are playoff no shows comes from their younger years playing teams that were super defensive or had great goaltending (Bruins, Columbus, Montreal).
Yes I can and I have. We've signed Matthews so we've committed. I don't think nor like the idea of handing out 10m+ contracts to Marner and Nylander to get them to stay. And JT may come in cheaper but even he's lighting it up right now so what the hell is he gonna want?
Someone has to go since they all have expectations of making 10m+. And the odd man out is Willy because he sucks at defense and doesn't kill penalty's like Marner does. If he wants to stay, he's gotta take a discount. Otherwise...trade him at the deadline and get maximum return to fill holes that we need to fill in the line up.
Signing him just runs it back and we've seen where that goes. Which is our team eliminated while a much more balanced team wins the cup.
No thanks.
is winning one playoff round in the last 6 years “staying competitive?” i’s a interesting question……..Tavares is an aging asset - the team has already experimented with shifting him to the wing (which is telling). He's the odd man out of the main 4 one way or the other after next season, and so frees up his most of his 11 mil for team balance. JT may come back, but if he does it's going to be for a steep discount m
We've also seen with the Domi/Bertuzzi signings so far (and for the record I still like both guys) that it's a lot harder to replace Nylander than many assume.
Matthews-Marner-Nylander guarantees the team stays competitive well beyond 2024 every season.
Nylander sucks at defense. Between the 3. Marner and Matthews have far more utility.I wouldn't lump these 3 together. The numbers have been posted many times and unlike the other two, Nylander's production has not dropped off in the playoffs. As far as "playing well", again, lumping 3 players together is a really bad idea and I'll just leave it at that.
I would argue that it won’t be possible to replace his productionTavares is an aging asset - the team has already experimented with shifting him to the wing (which is telling). He's the odd man out of the main 4 one way or the other after next season, and so frees up his most of his 11 mil for team balance. JT may come back, but if he does it's going to be for a steep discount m
We've also seen with the Domi/Bertuzzi signings so far (and for the record I still like both guys) that it's a lot harder to replace Nylander than many assume.
Matthews-Marner-Nylander guarantees the team stays competitive well beyond 2024 every season.
I was listening to Jim Nill this morning talking about how in the past 5 seasons, 5 teams have dropped out, and 5 teams have jumped into the playoffs.is winning one playoff round in the last 6 years “staying competitive?” i’s a interesting question……..
is winning one playoff round in the last 6 years “staying competitive?” i’s a interesting question……..
Just stop.I was listening to Jim Nill this morning talking about how in the past 5 seasons, 5 teams have dropped out, and 5 teams have jumped into the playoffs.
The Leafs making the playoffs in 7 consecutive years is a more difficult task than some admit in a salary cap era in a league that wants parity.
Yes, they have wasted some opportunities once they got there but at least our biggeat concern is how they will blow it in thecplayoffs instead of will they make it
I wouldn't lump these 3 together. The numbers have been posted many times and unlike the other two, Nylander's production has not dropped off in the playoffs. As far as "playing well", again, lumping 3 players together is a really bad idea and I'll just leave it at that.
So your happy with mediocre, okay that makes sense……..We spent 2003-2016 not even being able to make the playoffs. I've got little interest returning to that anytime soon, especially by choice
Haha.Just stop.
Championship or bust.
You actually think you get mitch at 10MM a year before his contract ends?That is a very good question. Fact is, Nylander has stepped up in previous playoffs more than any of the core 4 here in Toronto. Hopefully this season has all of them going.
In a perfect scenario, you get Willy signed for $10M @ 5 or 6 years. You get Mitch done this upcoming summer around the same AAV. Tavares is the odd guy out here. I like JT, but if he is not willing to extend at around $6M AAV then he is the one you let walk. No way you lose 88 or 16 for 91.
'Sucks at defense' is a big stretch. Nylander has average defensive acumen and once again the team's problem in the playoffs has not been its defense.Nylander sucks at defense. Between the 3. Marner and Matthews have far more utility.
Nylander is great at offense. Zone entries...play making.
No way Nylander gets 11mm except with another team. No way Marner cuts his salary down in the prime of his free agent years.I hate to get into the Willy vs. Marner thing. But there's one element that isn't talked about that I think is really pro-Willy. And I'm not saying it is the key element in comparison to other things like style of play etc etc.... But unfortunately in this market, there is a ton of pressure. On the surface, we all love Marner. Toronto boy who cares about the city and all that stuff. Willy is just a guy with pretty hair who doesn't care. Which "attitude" or "mindset" would you want in the playoffs?
On first glance, its easy to say Marner. But the second things go wrong and the media calls out Marner, he throws a hissy fit. Then he grips his stick tighter and makes poor decisions/plays. Some people can handle that pressure. A lot can't.
Then there's Willy. He just seems like he doesn't care. And for him specifically, that's great. Honestly. Cause when the media/fans/pressure come after him. He essentially portrays "I don't care" and lets it drip off and just does his thing. Honestly think that is a huge reason why he has just as much success if not more than Marner in the playoffs. Nothing to do with skill/heart/energy. It's a mental mindset.
I'm not saying you need a team full of players like that. But you need players who can handle the pressure, no matter how they handle it. Honestly when the game is on the line in the playoffs, the time we are all arguing about that needs to be conquered by this team, I'd pick Nylander over Marner in a do or die situation.
I realize Nylander has had his warts over the years and still has some warts, but he's shown a ton of growth over the past few years. Some have recognized it. Others made their bed when he held out or when Don said Ritchie was better, and there's no going back.
I just think when you analyze it all, including the difference in money they'd be making, the gap that separates the two isn't too far off and may even be non-existent.
Exactly. So if the discussion is, who is the odd man out since the team can't allocate too much money to these forwards.... Why does Nylander seem to be the easy answer? Again, maybe there will be no odd man out if the team forecasts a rising cap partnered with Tavares off the books (or returning at much, much lower salary) and that is how they will go about their business going forward.No way Nylander gets 11mm except with another team. No way Marner cuts his salary down in the prime of his free agent years.
An academic discussion can occur but but it has no practical use.
There you go - more reasons to not lump these 3 players together.Nylander sucks at defense. Between the 3. Marner and Matthews have far more utility.
Nylander is great at offense. Zone entries...play making.
Not sure what you mean by "evaluate them together", I'm just saying that these are three very different players so I wouldn't lump them together. And IIRC, Nylander's production in the playoffs compared to regular season hasn't dropped off at all whereas Marner's has, especially in games 5-7.Nylander’s playoff prowess is a bit overstated though. While it’s true that the delta between Nylander’s regular season and playoff stats is less dramatic than Matthews and Marner, the 3 of them have 47, 44 and 40 playoff career points respectively. I’ll let you figure out whose stats line is whose.
Nylander’s turnover to Barkov was also the catalyst for the Game 2 meltdown which ended up costing the Leafs that series. Yes he had brilliant showings later in the series and scored that game tying goal in Game 5…
So in the framing of paying these 3 guys each $10 million plus, I would absolutely evaluate them together.
Great post! We can't know what goes on in their heads but IMO it's quite likely that this "mental mindset" is exactly why Nylander has played up to expectations for us in the playoffs, and Marner hasn't. At least that's my opinion, I know some people are completely fine with Marner's performance but whatever.I hate to get into the Willy vs. Marner thing. But there's one element that isn't talked about that I think is really pro-Willy. And I'm not saying it is the key element in comparison to other things like style of play etc etc.... But unfortunately in this market, there is a ton of pressure. On the surface, we all love Marner. Toronto boy who cares about the city and all that stuff. Willy is just a guy with pretty hair who doesn't care. Which "attitude" or "mindset" would you want in the playoffs?
On first glance, its easy to say Marner. But the second things go wrong and the media calls out Marner, he throws a hissy fit. Then he grips his stick tighter and makes poor decisions/plays. Some people can handle that pressure. A lot can't.
Then there's Willy. He just seems like he doesn't care. And for him specifically, that's great. Honestly. Cause when the media/fans/pressure come after him. He essentially portrays "I don't care" and lets it drip off and just does his thing. Honestly think that is a huge reason why he has just as much success if not more than Marner in the playoffs. Nothing to do with skill/heart/energy. It's a mental mindset.
I'm not saying you need a team full of players like that. But you need players who can handle the pressure, no matter how they handle it. Honestly when the game is on the line in the playoffs, the time we are all arguing about that needs to be conquered by this team, I'd pick Nylander over Marner in a do or die situation.
I realize Nylander has had his warts over the years and still has some warts, but he's shown a ton of growth over the past few years. Some have recognized it. Others made their bed when he held out or when Don said Ritchie was better, and there's no going back.
I just think when you analyze it all, including the difference in money they'd be making, the gap that separates the two isn't too far off and may even be non-existent.
'Sucks at defense' is a big stretch. Nylander has average defensive acumen and once again the team's problem in the playoffs has not been its defense.
I wouldn't get rid of Willy. If there is a danger that he kills it this year and merits more than 10mm, the is on Tree. No chance I get rid of one of our best players to make space unless the return is mindblowing.Exactly. So if the discussion is, who is the odd man out since the team can't allocate too much money to these forwards.... Why does Nylander seem to be the easy answer? Again, maybe there will be no odd man out if the team forecasts a rising cap partnered with Tavares off the books (or returning at much, much lower salary) and that is how they will go about their business going forward.
But if someone needs to go pre-Tavares, I'm not sure why Nylander is the slam dunk easy choice. There's debates and pros and cons for both.
I would separate killing penalties from being good defensively 5on5 myself, two completely different things. Matthews up to now wasn't asked to kill penalties either, I'm pretty sure it's not because he's weak defensively.He's not asked to kill penalties for a reason. And his multiple stints at center fail because a centerman is suppose to play the full ice...back check and a higher responsibility on defensive assignments. Nylander fails at this. He's a winger. A great winger. But we have great wingers. We need defense and balance in our roster.
I would separate killing penalties from being good defensively 5on5 myself, two completely different things. Matthews up to now wasn't asked to kill penalties either, I'm pretty sure it's not because he's weak defensively.
I agree Nylander isn't great defensively, and that's why he's not suited to play centre. He is like you say, a great winger. I still think he need him though, right now we have two great wingers, losing him leaves us with just one. We've had trouble scoring in the biggest playoff games, seems to me like we should be trying to figure out how to keep Nylander.
Dubas f***ed the cap and there's not much that can be done now with the core 3 but pay them .
ride out this season and next with JT then use his cap space to try to fill out a more balanced roster , not ideal but i'm not trading either Willie or Mitch who are among the best play drivers in the league for multiple lesser pieces
"Mediocre" is floating in the middle of the pack, on the edge of in or out of the PO'S year in, year out. This team hasn't been mediocre in some time. We have been an upper echelon good to very good team since 34's arrival. What we HAVEN'T been is consistent. This team is maddening in its inability to not take bottom feeders like Ottawa or Montreal or Arizona seriously. I've never seen a team come out as flat as this one does against inferior competition. So many sleepy 1st periods. That's not mediocre...that's a coaching problem. I don't think Keefe lasts til the new year.So your happy with mediocre, okay that makes sense……..