Seanaconda
Registered User
- May 6, 2016
- 9,701
- 3,442
Always was.So does this make kucherovs last season more impressive than Mackinnons in hindsight
I don't think Stamkos's being there or not really made much of a difference. Stamkos did what every offensive forward would have done in that situation, being an option for Kucherov on the PP, that is.So does this make kucherovs last season more impressive than Mackinnons in hindsight
Kucherov was the stir in Tampa and management correctly identified stamkos as expendable.
Looks like they were right
To be fair. I don’t pay much attention to Tampa or much of the eastern conference. So no. I didn’t know most people you united on that opinion.I thought everyone with knowledge of the situation knew that. Stat nerds and Bolts fans were united in saying that Stamkos was a bad 5v5 player.
The guy has one point and his team is second to last in the standings. I think it's already rough.Year 3 and 4 are going to be rough.
I don't think he looks fully "cooked" to me. He hasn't had great luck so far. He is also being over-used. The team around him isn't meshing. I have seen some "cooked" players recently (Turris, Johansen)... he's not in that category. He should be a solid 30/30 kind of player at this point in his career, with appropriate utilization. Whether that is worth 4x$8M is still debateable. But I don't think it equates to being "cooked".Looks like this guy is cooked.
Well, I'll give him some time, but yeah. Not great. That's a lot of money.
Yes, 5-6 games is a big enough sampleSo does this make kucherovs last season more impressive than Mackinnons in hindsight
And at 8 aav. One less year than Lecavlair's Philly deal i guessOf course he’s cooked lol. He’s 34 lol.
2 years would’ve been reasonable, 4 years was a disaster from the beginning.
A cooked Turris is very different from a cooked Stamkos, though.I don't think he looks fully "cooked" to me. He hasn't had great luck so far. He is also being over-used. The team around him isn't meshing. I have seen some "cooked" players recently (Turris, Johansen)... he's not in that category. He should be a solid 30/30 kind of player at this point in his career, with appropriate utilization. Whether that is worth 4x$8M is still debateable. But I don't think it equates to being "cooked".
I know but for the Mac fans if stamkos posts a garbage year. .maybe they will admit itAlways was.
Sure...whatever makes you happy.I know but for the Mac fans if stamkos posts a garbage year. .maybe they will admit it
You do when you decide to leave a league leading power play that was pumping your numbers and were absolutely useless at 5v5 according to most metrics.He's not the player that he was and certainly looks like a shell of it at the moment, but it seems premature to call him "cooked" only 7 games into a season immediately following one in which he put up 40 goals and 81 points. Players don't go from a PPG to cooked overnight.
I think that he's still in shock over what happened in the Summer and uncomfortable with his new surroundings. It doesn't help that the team is so bad and disorganized on top of that. I think that it'll take months for him to get comfortable and I imagine that he'll end up having a better second half of the season. He may never get close to a PPG again or being worth his contract, but he should at least be capable of being a 20g/25a player, like Patrick Kane, which would still make him useful and not quite "cooked," IMO.
Tampa's #1 powerplay last season has dropped to #16 this season, so it seems like Stamkos may've been pumping its numbers. Also, he had 21 goals and 21 assists at even strength last season. Even if he barely scores on the powerplay in Nashville, 20g/25a should be doable for him, as I said.You do when you decide to leave a league leading power play that was pumping your numbers and were absolutely useless at 5v5 according to most metrics.
We could have brought back Arvidsson for half the price and half the term to get about the same level of production (health a huge question mark obviously). It would have left us with enough cap space to probably trade for/or sign a 2C or another d-man, and Arvy would have actually fit the system Bruno and our PP plays.Tampa's #1 powerplay last season has dropped to #16 this season, so it seems like Stamkos was pumping its numbers. Also, he had 21 goals and 21 assists at even strength last season. Even if he barely scores on the powerplay in Nashville, 20g/25a should be doable for him, as I said.