Norris Trophy Power Rankings: Rielly on top with gaudy offensive numbers

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Norris hasn't been about defending for ages now. Otherwise Karlsson, Burns, Subban or Hedman wouldn't have won the award.

Defending hasn’t been about hits and blocked shots for ages now.

Keeping the puck as far as possible from your own net has defensive value.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Hivemind
What's wrong with saying that Rielly is arguably the front runner for the Norris at this point in the season?

It's based on his offensive production which is undoubtedly inflated by that Toronto offense. He can be a finalist but he has no business winning.
 
They seem pretty real when I look up at them and bask in our team’s historical glory.

Clancy actually won more Cups for my team than the Leafs so I have to give you credit for bringing him up.

That’s definitely very objective of you. Kudos!

Maybe the guy you had before Melnyk spent a bit to make them look real.

Can we get back to the discussion about the Norris? And Rielly being the frontrunner, due to the best performance of any Dman in the NHL since Lidstrom?
 
You're the one positing that the Leafs Media bias somehow has them in the trophy running when they shouldn't be. You should be the one qualifying your claim with evidence.

When did I say he shouldn’t be in the running?

Where’s your evidence of that?
 
You’re the one who brought up Ottawa Senators superstar King Clancy.

you mean toronto maple leafs star. Second best ontario team dman in history.

Now, on to Rielly, think he'll get 2 points tonight? 3 points? With no goals against?

sounds about right.
 
you mean toronto maple leafs star. Second best ontario team dman in history.

Now, on to Rielly, think he'll get 2 points tonight? 3 points? With no goals against?

sounds about right.
Who's #1 over Clancy? Kelly played forward with the Leafs and I'm coming up blank - unless I'm forgetting someone on the Senators.
 
you mean toronto maple leafs star. Second best ontario team dman in history.

LOL, he played more seasons for the Senators, he won more Cups for the Senators.

Surely you have enough team history without trying to abscond with ours.

I wholeheartedly agree that he’s second to EK as second best Ontario defenceman in history.

Finally some common ground.
 
Who's #1 over Clancy? Kelly played forward with the Leafs and I'm coming up blank - unless I'm forgetting someone on the Senators.

It’s EK, who despite a slow start, is still in the running for Norris despite what @joedirte said - which is how this whole discussion started.
 
Who's #1 over Clancy? Kelly played forward with the Leafs and I'm coming up blank - unless I'm forgetting someone on the Senators.
Tim horton is considered by many to be among the top 30 or 40 players in NHL history.

I mean, all I see are old videos, but "NHL history" is a long long time.
 
LOL, he played more seasons for the Senators, he won more Cups for the Senators.

Surely you have enough team history without trying to abscond with ours.

I wholeheartedly agree that he’s second to EK as second best Ontario defenceman in history.

Finally some common ground.
Can't even play defense?!?!?!?!?!
 
Tim horton is considered by many to be among the top 30 or 40 players in NHL history.

I mean, all I see are old videos, but "NHL history" is a long long time.
I'd put Clancy over Horton pretty comfortably.

Edit: And I'm not going to entertain EK over Clancy at all.
 
No, he's not a stud defensively. But he's capable of being used in a purely defensive role, and the goalies behind him don't magically struggle like they do with other dmen. He's decent. Not exceptional, but decent.

Why are you making this a conversation of Karlsson. It's a discussion of this year's Norris, please leave Erik Karlsson out of it.
Cute. Did you forget this not-so-subtle jab of yours from this thread?

"Maybe the best performance by a Leaf dman, or any dman playing for an Ontario team, ever."
 
Cute. Did you forget this not-so-subtle jab of yours from this thread?

"Maybe the best performance by a Leaf dman, or any dman playing for an Ontario team, ever."

Yes, I'm putting what Rielly has been doing so far this year, into perspective.
 
"Leafs Have An AHL D. Hainsey is on the Top Pairing!"
"Reilly Should Not Be #1 on a list for the Norris".

Or
“Leafs actually have a top 5 D, top 10 at the worst”

“Rielly plays with a boat anchor of a partner”
 
It's based on his offensive production which is undoubtedly inflated by that Toronto offense. He can be a finalist but he has no business winning.
With this logic, Vezina candidates who have high SV%, wins, low GA should be knocked down a peg or two for playing on a strong team with good defense?

How do we adjust for that?
 
It's borderline insane to even include him in the conversation with Clancy and Horton, or even Salming, at all.

LOL, Salming.

The only thing he and EK have in common is that they are Swedish.

Salming is the result of a team that has so little talent for so long that he stands out.

One First Team all star selection over his entire career. Even Mike Green has two.
 
LOL, Salming.

The only thing he and EK have in common is that they are Swedish.

Salming is the result of a team that has so little talent for so long that he stands out.

One First Team all star selection over his entire career. Even Mike Green has two.
Salming. Forever known as "the King". Was always near the top of the league scoring, AND could beat the piss out of you. Take a skate to the face? No problem, I'll play.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad