CrosbyMalkin
Registered User
- Aug 7, 2005
- 6,700
- 1,722
The thread was made before the half-way mark, and Rielly had a legitimate case for being called the best defenceman up until that point. No one is arguing he's actually better than Karlsson or Burns. If the Norris winner was actually the best defenceman Karlsson would have like 6 or 7 of them by now.
I disagree, Karlsson was not the best defenseman for 6-7 years. He put up eye popping points which got him that title. I think his defensive game has improved over the years but too many times the Norris goes to the highest point total defenseman which usually is not the best overall defenseman. Just like Rielly was not the best defenseman when he had a decent point spread over other defenseman. Now he has been surpassed in points and most likely will be by a few more defenseman. That still doesn’t change that he never was a top 5 defenseman at any time this year. Norris and Hart have always been a joke of an award.