Player | Total Games Played | Total Points | 21/22 games | 21/22 points | 21/22 5on5 points | % of time on ice against elite |
Dahlin | 292 | 178 | 80 | 53 | 27 | 32.60% |
Hughes | 218 | 179 | 76 | 68 | 27 | 32.20% |
Boqvist | 132 | 51 | 52 | 22 | 16 | 21.20% |
Bouchard | 118 | 54 | 81 | 43 | 31 | 27% |
Dobson | 177 | 84 | 80 | 51 | 25 | 26.20% |
I think its a little early to put him as clear#2 from draft. Id still have Hughes ahead of him, and Bouchard tied with Dobson. Although Dobson is having a wonderful start to the year. here are there numbers for careers and last year. last column is from puckiq.com
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]Player[/TD]
[TD]Total Games Played[/TD]
[TD]Total Points[/TD]
[TD]21/22 games[/TD]
[TD]21/22 points[/TD]
[TD]21/22 5on5 points[/TD]
[TD]% of time on ice against elite[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dahlin[/TD]
[TD]292[/TD]
[TD]178[/TD]
[TD]80[/TD]
[TD]53[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]32.60%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Hughes[/TD]
[TD]218[/TD]
[TD]179[/TD]
[TD]76[/TD]
[TD]68[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]32.20%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Boqvist[/TD]
[TD]132[/TD]
[TD]51[/TD]
[TD]52[/TD]
[TD]22[/TD]
[TD]16[/TD]
[TD]21.20%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Bouchard[/TD]
[TD]118[/TD]
[TD]54[/TD]
[TD]81[/TD]
[TD]43[/TD]
[TD]31[/TD]
[TD]27%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dobson[/TD]
[TD]177[/TD]
[TD]84[/TD]
[TD]80[/TD]
[TD]51[/TD]
[TD]25[/TD]
[TD]26.20%[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
-Dahlin and Hughes seem to have the hardest minutes of the bunch, and also the most experienced in NHL.
-Hughes is the best point producer out of the bunch but that's mostly due to pp opportunity. if we look at 5on5 Bouchard is slightly ahead of the other big 3.
-I dont have a way to compare defensive impact as I dont think xGA is a good indicator of that. these guys were mostly drafted for their offensive contributions anyways.
I disagree. Data shows last year dahlin and Hughes were clear best. Both played top pair and had great production. Next I'd have bouch and dobson who played similar minutes, personally I'd rather Bouchard who had better 5on5 numbers.Dahlin, Dobson, and Hughes are clearly ahead of the rest of the pack from the draft, with Miller and Bouchard a fair bit behind them.
Dahlin and Hughes both play tougher minutes than Dobson because those 2 teams dont have anyone near Pelech/Pulock as a lockdown pair.
In a redraft I think it would go
Dahlin
Dobson
Hughes
With Dobson/Hughes being very close. Hughes obviously being electric offensively, while Dobson being a big rangy 2 way RD similar to Pietrangelo.
I disagree. Data shows last year dahlin and Hughes were clear best. Both played top pair and had great production. Next I'd have bouch and dobson who played similar minutes, personally I'd rather Bouchard who had better 5on5 numbers.
meh I dont put much value in HFboards polls, I put more weight in the stats I showed.Go look at the recent poll of Dobson vs Bouchard. Its clear you are in the minority. Dobson is much better than Bouchard. Hughes wouldnt be playing top pair on the isles either.
Go look at the recent poll of Dobson vs Bouchard. Its clear you are in the minority. Dobson is much better than Bouchard. Hughes wouldnt be playing top pair on the isles either.
His early nickname on HF Isles was "The Big Easy" and it's still holds up well.
Cool, calm, collected and fluid.
I think its a little early to put him as clear#2 from draft. Id still have Hughes ahead of him, and Bouchard tied with Dobson. Although Dobson is having a wonderful start to the year. here are there numbers for careers and last year. last column is from puckiq.com
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]Player[/TD]
[TD]Total Games Played[/TD]
[TD]Total Points[/TD]
[TD]21/22 games[/TD]
[TD]21/22 points[/TD]
[TD]21/22 5on5 points[/TD]
[TD]% of time on ice against elite[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dahlin[/TD]
[TD]292[/TD]
[TD]178[/TD]
[TD]80[/TD]
[TD]53[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]32.60%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Hughes[/TD]
[TD]218[/TD]
[TD]179[/TD]
[TD]76[/TD]
[TD]68[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]32.20%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Boqvist[/TD]
[TD]132[/TD]
[TD]51[/TD]
[TD]52[/TD]
[TD]22[/TD]
[TD]16[/TD]
[TD]21.20%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Bouchard[/TD]
[TD]118[/TD]
[TD]54[/TD]
[TD]81[/TD]
[TD]43[/TD]
[TD]31[/TD]
[TD]27%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dobson[/TD]
[TD]177[/TD]
[TD]84[/TD]
[TD]80[/TD]
[TD]51[/TD]
[TD]25[/TD]
[TD]26.20%[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
-Dahlin and Hughes seem to have the hardest minutes of the bunch, and also the most experienced in NHL.
-Hughes is the best point producer out of the bunch but that's mostly due to pp opportunity. if we look at 5on5 Bouchard is slightly ahead of the other big 3.
-I dont have a way to compare defensive impact as I dont think xGA is a good indicator of that. these guys were mostly drafted for their offensive contributions anyways.
He was the guy I wanted in that draft for the Wings. Was thrilled Zadina dropped to us at the time but there were some good defense prospects in that draft around there. But yeah, I wish we got Dobson. Looks way better than Boqvist and Bouchard.
That was payback for Gordie Clark being with the Isles previously and setting them back a decade. Thanks Gordie.Glad the rangers drafted kravtsov.
I thought it was interesting that he missed the puck at the offensive blueline in the Toronto game last night and instead of bobbling it at the line and risk a counter rush he just bailed on the puck and beelined it back deep into defensive position. It was so conservative and rare to see but I respect it.
U can say this for drafted players in just about every major sports league. Development is not linear like many on HF seem to believe.2018 should be a great reminder that the top 5 of a draft isn't always going to be the top 5 in 5 years.
U can say this for drafted players in just about every major sports league. Development is not linear like many on HF seem to believe.
It's also incredibly franchise specific. Good franchises develop player better and players drafted into shitty situations don't thrive as well.
Bouchard was a touch more ready for the nhl but I thiufht long term Dobson would be better given his better skating ability.Said it at the draft and I'll say it again. Passing on him for Bouchard was a massive mistake. Bouchard is a fine 2nd pairing guy but Dobson is a true 1st pairing Dman.
The problem with us and has been since our inception is, we have to draft players, nobody wants to come play for us unless a massive overpay. I mean, I'm 90% sure every player that had/has a trade clause the islanders were on the list of teams not to be traded to lol. When was the last big free agent signing the islanders had? I can't even think of one.What's impressive with the Islanders is they have their best 4 D all drafted and developed with the franchise
So much this. We were in a great position where we could slowly let him develope instead of a situation like Hedman or Dahlin where they were asked to be the savior right out of the draft. Getting to be around players like Pelech, Pulock, Leddy, Boychuk, Chara, Greene for his 1st few years surely helped lol.It's also incredibly franchise specific. Good franchises develop player better and players drafted into shitty situations don't thrive as well.