Channelcat
Mennonite
Ya, how about Wpg vs Mn in the first round?And some lucky team in the central just finds out that Winnipeg will be their first round opponents...
Ya, how about Wpg vs Mn in the first round?And some lucky team in the central just finds out that Winnipeg will be their first round opponents...
Don't recall any of our reporters ever asking that question but someone should .Have we ever heard Maurices rationale for that Pk? Maybe Hayes will take over eventually....idk. It does seem weird.
That's what i was thinnin too .I think we see
27 55 26
81 12 29
85 18 28
13 17 9
In practice today.
He has said that they are a couple of our best PKers, so he has to use them.Have we ever heard Maurices rationale for that Pk? Maybe Hayes will take over eventually....idk. It does seem weird.
Don't recall any of our reporters ever asking that question but someone should .
That's just dumb then , how can so many of us dummies on this board see that they can't kill penalties and our Coaching staff can't ?He has said that they are a couple of our best PKers, so he has to use them.
Hayes was one of the Rangers best penalty killers , Copp can kill penalties , Lowry can kill penalties , Tanev can kill penalties , Little can kill penalties . That's 5 good penalty killers right there , Appleton can kill and Frenchie , that's 7 . Take Scheif and Wheeler off and it cuts their ice times down so maybe they could be able to back check .IIRC, it was covered in The Athletic recently, and 55 and 26 are good on the PK. Whether they were meaningfully better than other options I don’t recall, and there’s clearly a balance to be struck between PK advantage with them on it vs., say, Hayes and Copp, and their value as less tired, less sloppy 5v5 players, who aren’t injured by blocking shots. Basically, fewer penalties solves both problems.
FYI. We are a .500 club wins / losses for the last 30 games of the season. That's the last 30 games we have played. This is how we have been playing for a long, long, long time. 30 games is the last 48% of the season. In round numbers, for the last 1/2 of the season we are a .500 team.
I hope the Hendricks / Hayes / Dmen additions help. But we have a very difficult schedule from here on in. This idea that we have a switch that we can simply flick and dominate games is not born out by the team results. I have to believe that coaching is holding this team back. Utilization decisions have been questionable all year long. Look who was on the ice in a 1 goal game with a minute and a half left in the game last night on the game tying goal.
Our coaching is a key weak link on this team. Either that or you believe that this is a 0.500 caliber roster. You decide.
If this is the best we see from the Jets going into the playoffs I don't really feel optimistic.
The game overall was good until the very end. I don't know if I'm a fan of Roslovic playing with KC and Little.
Mods please unlock the tank thread. ... That is all . ..
I've heard the team just plays down to their opponents, so they should be fine against tough teams right?
I don't think it's right to put the blame squarely on the shoulders of the coach. The players are just as responsible. I don't believe arguments that they're unmotivated because there's no accountability. If you're a first placed team, and youre in the Cup conversation, that's all the motivation you should need.
FYI. We are a .500 club wins / losses for the last 30 games of the season. That's the last 30 games we have played. This is how we have been playing for a long, long, long time. 30 games is the last 48% of the season. In round numbers, for the last 1/2 of the season we are a .500 team.
I hope the Hendricks / Hayes / Dmen additions help. But we have a very difficult schedule from here on in. This idea that we have a switch that we can simply flick and dominate games is not born out by the team results. I have to believe that coaching is holding this team back. Utilization decisions have been questionable all year long. Look who was on the ice in a 1 goal game with a minute and a half left in the game last night on the game tying goal.
Our coaching is a key weak link on this team. Either that or you believe that this is a 0.500 caliber roster. You decide.
It's not all on the coach. It is never (or hardly ever) only one thing. But if coaching is not an issue at all, then do you believe this roster is a .500 calibre roster? That's the way we have played for 30 games in a row now.
FYI. We are a .500 club wins / losses for the last 30 games of the season. That's the last 30 games we have played. This is how we have been playing for a long, long, long time. 30 games is the last 48% of the season. In round numbers, for the last 1/2 of the season we are a .500 team.
I hope the Hendricks / Hayes / Dmen additions help. But we have a very difficult schedule from here on in. This idea that we have a switch that we can simply flick and dominate games is not born out by the team results. I have to believe that coaching is holding this team back. Utilization decisions have been questionable all year long. Look who was on the ice in a 1 goal game with a minute and a half left in the game last night on the game tying goal.
Our coaching is a key weak link on this team. Either that or you believe that this is a 0.500 caliber roster. You decide.
It's not all on the coach. It is never (or hardly ever) only one thing. But if coaching is not an issue at all, then do you believe this roster is a .500 calibre roster? That's the way we have played for 30 games in a row now.
he turned the corner for 1 week and then made another turn, unfortunately.I've found it hard to be a Roslovic fan this year - anywhere. Except that one game on PP2.
Should have sent him to the Moose and kept Apples.
We will make the playoffs some how, however we wont make it out of the first round. I cant name a team I think we would beat in the 1st round.
I agree with most of what you are saying but I think this's on the players not the coaching.
He’s likely too good for the AHL, but hasn’t established himself as an effective NHL’er yet. I question if he’ll ever be more than a bottom 6 player, but time will tell. I think Chevy and PoMo want him to gain that experience to one day be an effective contributor as a complementary piece - in a pp and pk role as well. I think having him be our #2 C, eventually replacing Little, is a few years down the road if at all.I've found it hard to be a Roslovic fan this year - anywhere. Except that one game on PP2.
Should have sent him to the Moose and kept Apples.