Dr Quincy
Registered User
- Jun 19, 2005
- 29,368
- 11,679
Explain how a team can offer more than one offer sheet at a time.Not if Sens through 9 million at each of Trouba, Connor, and Laine.
Explain how a team can offer more than one offer sheet at a time.Not if Sens through 9 million at each of Trouba, Connor, and Laine.
Dude whens the last offer sheet that happend? Stop bringing up these offer sheets they arent gonna happen. JezTeams would likely rather catch another GM off guard with an offer sheet rather than take on Zaitsev and his horrible deal
Not a chance! Haha
Try every thread after that one time you made the playoffs.Link?
Guys.....enough with the petty shots back and fourth.......next comes infractions.
Jack Johnson got a 5 year deal for less money last season but he was 4 years older than Zaitzev is now. Erik Gudbranson will probably get 4-5 years this summer from some dumb GM.
For once, I agree with Babcock, especially when he almost implies it might be a scam.The problem is only that novice hockey fans put stock into player metrics, a tracking system that actually misses far more data than in actually records.
The fact this needs to be explained to you means you’re incapable of performing an eye test.
“Analytics, what a thing... a lot of people making money off that (chuckles) ... good for them!” - Mike Babcock
You have no idea how offer sheets work, do you ?Not if Sens through 9 million at each of Trouba, Connor, and Laine.
Toronto fans/the media actually think he has value? He actually has negative value...
They can't with his example....which you know.Explain how a team can offer more than one offer sheet at a time.
Toronto fans/the media actually think he has value? He actually has negative value...
Or maybe the voices in your head...because it looks like the vast majority of people concede that the Leafs would have to take some $$ back and/or send a pick as a sweetener to make any prospective deal for him work.
I just listened to Button say otherwise on TSN, T.O's media is either delusional or theyre being paid to pump Zaitsev's tires.
Or maybe people who get paid to know these things are orders of magnitude better informed than a random Habs fan is.
There is a Stanley Cup? Who is in it? Growlers up 3-1 in the prestigious Kelly Cup Final though with a 4-2 win tonight over Toledo.Am I the only one amused that the entire Stanley Cup final thread is at like 2500 posts while a thread on Zaitsev is at 944 posts in 26 hours?
Gudbrandson has two years left and won't be getting anything this summer.Jack Johnson got a 5 year deal for less money last season but he was 4 years older than Zaitzev is now. Erik Gudbranson will probably get 4-5 years this summer from some dumb GM.
If a team was looking for a bottom pairing 4m dollar Dman, why wouldn't they just trade for one of the guys you mentioned, who are all better than Zaitsev and signed for significantly less term?If Zaitsev is flexible about where he will go it shouldn't be too hard to move his contract.
4.5M cap hit for 5 years but is owed an average of 3.9 per year in real dollars after collecting 3M signing bonus on July 1st.
That's Ian Cole, Gudbranson, Kulikov, De Haan UFA type money. All deals signed in recent off-seasons. All guys coming off bad seasons (similar to Zaitsev) when they signed those deals. Zaitsev also looked a lot better after switching to playing Muzzin instead of Gardiner which I bet intrigues some GM's.
The options for UFA Dmen is also brutal this off-season so I'd expect some GM to take a shot on him.
Yeah, but now he has a hole at bottom pairing, overpaid defenceman.He got Tanner Pearson for the rotting corpse of Erik Gudbranson.
It looks like he likes offloading overpaid bottom pairing defencemen, not giving up assets for them.