Pepper said:
You seem to like give the impression that you're well informed and have access to information beyond headlines & public rumors, why don't you go ask your sources what the deal is?
On the contrary, I am relying solely on public news sources. I have been around and like to connect the dots myself to come up with conclusions of my own, but I try to tread safely so as not to reach into anything unreasonable. Sometimes more successfully than others.
Pepper said:
Janne couldn't work with Summanen - had he stayed the argument with Summanen would have poisoned the whole lockerroom.
This is getting back to the keep the mouth shut -argument, but Janne did have several alternatives. He could have bitten his lip, taken the abuse no matter how unreasonable it may have been, and settled for a place at the end of the bench. Happens in NHL all the time. After the tournament he would have had plenty of opportunities to bring up his side of the story. Or if it got really, really, really bad, he could have told Summanen in private to leave him out of the playing 20 and watched the rest of the tournament from the stands. It happens, someone's got to sit and he was the backup to begin with, so no big deal.
Instead he chose to make a scene and distance himself publicly from Summanen and the team, which directly led to the media circus we're in now and put the rest of the players in an immensely difficult spot under the spotlight. You may call it honest, I call it destructive. It very nearly cost us a place in the semis, and it remains to be seen how it affects the team later on. If Janne didn't see the storm coming as a direct consequence of his choice, he was stupid at worst and naive at best. Yes, Summanen was at fault too but you can't change the coach halfway through a tournament. If something's got to give, it's the player.
Honestly, I am really looking forward to hearing what these "really ugly details" are. Sure I can understand that a person of Summanen's temper and demeanor can really get under your skin with some serious abuse, but still. We are talking World Cup of Hockey here, the best of the best assembling, playoffs about to get started, a crucial moment if anything, the entire country holding its breath. It had really better be something special, something worthy of a book deal and a defamation lawsuit that shadows the STT case a few years back. "My d*** is bigger than yours" just won't do.
What also bugs me is how most everybody in Finland seems to think Janne is some kind of an angel. First of all, he was discontent from day one and even came out saying it out loud right before the tournament (in Kaleva newspaper, they say). Great timing, great attitude. Then there's his behaviour that sparked this mess, as I have painstakingly tried to point out.
Now he's meeting with reporters in pubs just off chance, making it very clear he's got no regrets and positively made the right choice, but of course he doesn't want to stir the pot and talk about this now. Well Einstein, you just did. The same with MTV3, yes I sure can take all the criticism in the world but no, of course I don't want talk about this but will allow the guys to focus on the game. All I can say is, just cause he's been a great guy before doesn't mean he's incapable of making a mistake now.
I have never been a Kummola fan (who has?) but I will raise my hat to him for his remarks in this morning's Helsingin Sanomat newspaper, where he made it clear what's most annoying is that something like this should come up smack in the middle of the tournament, and that the media would have such a field day with it. Yes he made it clear Summanen's not the easiest fellow to hang around with, however he also stated quite rightly that Janne's behaviour is unacceptable, how blame goes both ways.
Edit: a couple of typos