Can we logically assume that no player of Robertsons status is going to be promised a NHL job? If we agree on that can we also agree that he should have no beef with the Leafs?
He waited till he had what he thinks is leverage. Him holding out and asking for a trade is miles apart from Nylander holding out for the first month-ish of the season. Nylander was an A+ prospect, he had leverage ... Nick is a C+ prospect, he has no leverage. Nick wants to be a pro, I think he thinks it's the Leafs holding him back because of some sort of prejudice towards his game, I would suggest it's Nick's poor defensive play that is holding him back. I think it is as simple as a guy looking for a fresh start.
From my understanding, he has an issue with development staff, I am not even sure it is around playing time (I'm sure it'd factor into it though).
We have worse players who are penciled in, so we can agree no one should be promised a job that is his level, but I am not sure the Leafs management agrees.
My issue is throwing away the career of one of our best prospects, I want to see it through because there is a lot of upside, he is 22, and he is our 2nd best prospect, he is not a C+ level prospect.
And if there is no way to mend the relationship, move him for whatever you can get.
Hurting his development only hurts his value to the team whether we trade him or not.
I know he doesn't bring as much to the game as someone like Knies or McMann, but he outscored both of them (PPG).
Bert and Domi barely had a higher PPG.
We need secondary scoring.
Just for reference, Mavrik Borque's stock just shot up due to putting up 1.08PPG as a 21 year old in the AHL.
Robertson was 1.22 last year at 22, and 1.00 at 21.
The offensive upside is there for him, it's so dumb to not try to make it work.