BallardEra
Leafs&Caps Since 1982™
Watching Pens vs Avs before Oilers game starts.
13-2 shots for the Avs. Pens look very slow compared to the Avs.
13-2 shots for the Avs. Pens look very slow compared to the Avs.
This is gonna be a very interesting stretch of hockey going into the playoffs. Much more interesting than last years playoff race.Thanks for nothing, Colorado and Seattle. The Metro teams have won four of five games they’ve played and Pittsburgh could make that five for five if they beat Colorado in OT right now. Florida also beat Tampa as well. Literally no help.
I don't care that it's "impolite to discuss." I care that it's speculative BS....but if you attempt to answer that question, he hits you with the "You're being mean because he might have a Real Problem that's impolite to discuss!" bat.
He looked awesome tonight, his asking price keeps going upI will take one (1) Timo Meier please. Short-term and long-term solution in the top 6. Provided he is extended in DC give San Jose two first round picks and a good prospect I don’t care.
We can’t afford a contract like that until post-OV And Backstrom. Might as well embrace it. There will be three more of those when we can.He looked awesome tonight, his asking price keeps going up
Post-Backstrom could be any moment.We can’t afford a contract like that until post-OV And Backstrom. Might as well embrace it. There will be three more of those when we can.
Interesting thought exercise: should we value '23 & '24 first round picks more than CMM/Lapierre? I think SJS would given uncertainty re: the core's age/health so the Caps should likewise. The Caps could put some protections on those but...I don't know. I tend to think this team is cooked either way in the near-term as a contender even after adding a Meier and clearing out some dead weight.I will take one (1) Timo Meier please. Short-term and long-term solution in the top 6. Provided he is extended in DC give San Jose two first round picks and a good prospect I don’t care.
Because of his struggles with a variety of coaching here on multiple levels and the way they punted himWhat indication do you have that the Capitals determined it was "unfixable" or that it was even an issue while he was with the Capitals? We don't know what's going on with him, nor do we know how long it's been going on. Until we know more, claiming the Capitals had it figure into their logic is purely speculation.
Interesting thought exercise: should we value '23 & '24 first round picks more than CMM/Lapierre? I think SJS would given uncertainty re: the core's age/health so the Caps should likewise. The Caps could put some protections on those but...I don't know. I tend to think this team is cooked either way in the near-term as a contender even after adding a Meier and clearing out some dead weight.
Meier would very likely assure that they make it in this year but beyond that and a slight increase in Puncher's Chance I don't know that it's enough. Their center play would still be pretty mid and they'd be locked in to the point where it's hard to see how that changes any time soon. At some point they will need to go all-in on a move. Meier is very good but I'm not sure that's it for them.
Reporters know, they just aren’t airing it out and writing about it. Which makes it seem that it’s a personal issue as opposed to a bad attitude or something along those lines.I don't care that it's "impolite to discuss." I care that it's speculative BS.
I want reporters to do digging on the issue, not random forum posters to spin whatever narrative is convenient for their perspective on the team. I think that's fairly obvious.
I think that's speculatively fitting a narrative to the circumstances, not any true evidence. It's the same type of post-hoc justifications we've seen for all sort of coaching decisions lately. "He's in the coach's doghouse, therefor he must [bad at X/have issue Y/etc]."Because of his struggles with a variety of coaching here on multiple levels and the way they punted him
I think that's speculatively fitting a narrative to the circumstances, not any true evidence. It's the same type of post-hoc justifications we've seen for all sort of coaching decisions lately. "He's in the coach's doghouse, therefor he must [bad at X/have issue Y/etc]."
I don't know much about Vrana's problem. Did he drink too much in the Cup celebration and have had an alcohol problem since?