twabby
Registered User
- Mar 9, 2010
- 14,115
- 15,592
Gallant should rightfully get some heat for scratching one of their good young players and instead dressing a player who was clearly too injured to play. Just a baffling decision!
why hate some other team for winning? if they win they win, caps arent winning this anywayI don't really like the Avs but I cant stand the idea of a threepeat
So yeah, looks like the Rangers blowing the 2-0 lead in G3 up 2-0 in the series was just like our G4 (or G5, take your pick). Can’t let your opponent who is better than you off the hook.
Threepeat doesn't bother me at all, so long as it's not a Pennsylvania team.
Hard to like Kucherov with his lazy penalties and frequent cheap shots (e.g., shooting puck at Rangers’ player in corner with 2 seconds left ‘while sitting on a 3-1 lead).Yeah. I find TB to be a pretty likeable team to boot. I actually enjoy watching them.
That would be a really bold conclusion when the other goalie was VasilevskiyDid not watch all of the series so maybe wrong, but this could also cause Caps management to take a second look at the failure vs FLA and conclude upgrading goaltending is secondary to fixing other issues.
The thinking being, if NYR can do the exact same thing with one of the best goalies in the business then maybe the vulnerability lies elsewhere.
Maybe that's wrong maybe it's right. We probably still need better goaltending IN ADDITION to a better overall gameplan, structure, mental approach, and X number of skaters.
That would be a really bold conclusion when the other goalie was Vasilevskiy
Okay? If they’re comparing Samsonov and Bobrovsky to Shesterkin and Vasilevskiy I really don’t even know where to start. There is no lesson to be learned from watching two of the league’s best go at it except that maybe a better goalie would help.Bob got stronger as the series went on vs the Caps, though.
Okay? If they’re comparing Samsonov and Bobrovsky to Shesterkin and Vasilevskiy I really don’t even know where to start. There is no lesson to be learned from watching two of the league’s best go at it except that maybe a better goalie would help.
It also doesn’t really make a lot of sense to skimp on a goalie again when Bob getting better over the series is just a smaller version of the same point: goalies win games. If you need the other team’s goalie to stay as bad as yours you’re f***ing up.
As for NYR, they had trouble generating offense 5v5, that was their Achilles heel. They really rode their PP this postseason (and got lucky facing Louie Domingue and Raanta). Once the refs started swallowing their whistles against TB, the Rags really struggled.Did not watch all of the series so maybe wrong, but this could also cause Caps management to take a second look at the failure vs FLA and conclude upgrading goaltending is secondary to fixing other issues.
The thinking being, if NYR can do the exact same thing with one of the best goalies in the business then maybe the vulnerability lies elsewhere.
Maybe that's wrong maybe it's right. We probably still need better goaltending IN ADDITION to a better overall gameplan, structure, mental approach, and X number of skaters.
that would bum me out so hardI'm not saying it's a smart analysis. I'm speculating they might look at NYR collapsing in similar fashion with top goaltending and diminish their own need.
I think it can be both. It's largely random, but in very rare cases it's possible to rise above that sea of randomness. In the Lightning's case, they had possibly the best stretch of drafting in league history from 2011 to 2016. Here's some of their non-1st round picks in that span, all outside the top 50.Maybe it's just copium, but I always defended the lack of success of the Caps as hockey is random. You see, we didn't choke, hockey is just random and we got unlucky.
That's why there have been no dynasties since the 80s. More parity, more luck, more randomness.
So if there is a new dynasty, then we have to admit that actually hockey is not as random as we thought, the better team actually does win most of the time, and the Caps core are genuinely just a bunch of losers and chokers who got lucky once.
It's kind of retrograde reasoning, I admit, but for that reason I aways root against defending champions and dynasties.
Kind of reminds me of how everyone was sure Ken Holland was a genius for years and he was a staple on "best GM" lists because of the late round Datsyuk/Zetterberg picks and Detroit being Detroit, but then when you can't do it again over 20 years (very fair) people call you old and busted instead of reevaluating.I think it can be both. It's largely random, but in very rare cases it's possible to rise above that sea of randomness. In the Lightning's case, they had possibly the best stretch of drafting in league history from 2011 to 2016. Here's some of their non-1st round picks in that span, all outside the top 50.
2011:
2 (58) - Nikita Kucherov
7 (208) - Ondrej Palat
2012:
4 (101) - Cedric Paquette
2014:
3 (79) - Brayden Point
2015:
3 (72) - Anthony Cirelli
4 (120) - Mathieu Joseph
2016:
4 (116) - Ross Colton
When you draft two superstars, two second liners, and a few good depth players with non-first rounders in a 6 year span, good things happen. Not exactly a repeatable strategy though.
Threepeat doesn't bother me at all, so long as it's not a Pennsylvania team.