We’ve taken our lab to the same vet for 9 years and on the 10th she had her first ear infection. The vet tech grabber her ear and she yelped in pain and gave a small nip to get away.
We're definitely not taking HFBoards with us to the QV.
Don't tease me like thisTeam Spite F - Keith Jones
Garbage player, garbage broadcaster, garbage human being. I wish that braindead **** the worst.
@Magua sorry for the wait. I never got a notification that I was up.
I told you lolI guess it's best to get them out of the way as quickly as possible, but back-to-backs suck rhino ass.
That's classy, innit. We start the day with @Asnito on the clock, @Strawberry Fields on deck, and @mja on the lido deck with one pick and then another which will send us back up the order.
F***ing people, man. I watched the third "Fantastic Beasts" movie on Friday, and afterwards I wanted to see if they were going to make any more. I guess it came out pretty recently, but I hadn't heard any reaction to it, or to the series as a whole - I'd been avoiding everything about it until I'd had a chance to watch them. Turns out that reaction to them hasn't been great, which came as a surprise to me - I'd thought they must have been very popular.
So in digging around for info on the future of the "Wizarding World," I saw what the complaints were. And of course, the conclusion Warner Brothers came to was that "it failed because it lacked the original characters (Harry et al)." The movies aren't really worth much of a f***, but the one thing I was excited about was moving beyond the stories of the original characters. The one thing I liked (to a point) was the relationships between the new adult characters, and the fact that it lacked gormless child acting (having been replaced by gormless adult acting). So of course that will be the first thing to go if they continue in this world, and they definitely will. Member berries, innit.
The movie itself really doesn't even warrant comment, it was that half-baked, so I don't know why I care. I don't, actually, and neither should you.
I guess it's best to get them out of the way as quickly as possible, but back-to-backs suck rhino ass.
That's classy, innit. We start the day with @Asnito on the clock, @Strawberry Fields on deck, and @mja on the lido deck with one pick and then another which will send us back up the order.
F***ing people, man. I watched the third "Fantastic Beasts" movie on Friday, and afterwards I wanted to see if they were going to make any more. I guess it came out pretty recently, but I hadn't heard any reaction to it, or to the series as a whole - I'd been avoiding everything about it until I'd had a chance to watch them. Turns out that reaction to them hasn't been great, which came as a surprise to me - I'd thought they must have been very popular.
So in digging around for info on the future of the "Wizarding World," I saw what the complaints were. And of course, the conclusion Warner Brothers came to was that "it failed because it lacked the original characters (Harry et al)." The movies aren't really worth much of a f***, but the one thing I was excited about was moving beyond the stories of the original characters. The one thing I liked (to a point) was the relationships between the new adult characters, and the fact that it lacked gormless child acting (having been replaced by gormless adult acting). So of course that will be the first thing to go if they continue in this world, and they definitely will. Member berries, innit.
The movie itself really doesn't even warrant comment, it was that half-baked, so I don't know why I care. I don't, actually, and neither should you.
My only problem with Katherine Waterston is how much she resembles her father. Like, she’s a bit of a sex bomb in Inherent Vice but all I kept thinking was, “damn, I guess Jack McCoy is kinda sexy.”
