So first of all I'm going to explain how I ranked my top-62 guys in the draft. I used the baseball 20-80 FV scale (or I guess how Pronman does it in hockey) but I obviously tweaked it to what I have below instead of rating their skills individually like Pronman does. It's extremely arbitrary due to the fact that players can have all sorts of impacts on an average season, but the idea behind it was to predict what I felt was the players ceiling by using a FV number and then using a letter to show how likely I feel the player was to actually hit that ceiling.
For example, with a guy like
Lafreniere (I have him as a 65 C): That means I believe he has the potential to be a Top-5 LW in the NHL at around a 41-59% probability (the probabilities are completely made up based on gut feel), but the idea behind my rankings is that is his ceiling and the likelihood he actually hits that. Then the rankings trickle down with the idea that he isn't able to hit his ceiling, there is a B chance (60-75%) to be a 60 FV player (top-10 player at the position) because I find it more likely for him to be that in the NHL than what I believe his ceiling is. Again you can put it one step further and see that I believe the strongest chance of what he becomes in the league is a 55 A (1st line F).
Another example, Alexander Holtz (55 F):
55 F (1st line F, 24% of less chance) > 50 D (Top-6 F, 25-40% chance) > 45 C (2nd line F, 41-59%) > 40 B (3rd line F, 60-75%) > 35 A (bottom-6 F, 76% or better).
Meaning I think there's a small chance that he could be a first line player, but I also think his skills and abilities will at worst make him a decent to low-end 3rd liner.
View attachment 370046
Now if you were able to get through all that and still are interested, here are my rankings (you could probably convince me any guy in a tier is close enough to be ranked ahead of another):
View attachment 370053View attachment 370055View attachment 370056View attachment 370058