What part of sentences starting with “I think…” implies I did anything other than express an opinion? No need to re-frame it as anything other than that, just to undermine it without addressing the points made.
Shesterkin had a couple of bad starts, sure. In fact he had three starts of .879 or less…
… in his past 18 games. He actually had five starts of .970 or more during the same timeframe. If three off-games is enough to tank an otherwise Hart-worthy season, what do we do with the 11 games where Huberdeau didn’t register a point? Common sense says we look at those games in context and realize they don’t mean much on an 82-game schedule.
If Shesterkin tanks the final month of the season, sure, write him off. But that doesn’t mean that Huberdeau had the better argument when the argument was made.
As of now, Huberdeau:
- doesn’t have an argument based on points — he’s 4th, behind McDavid/Draisaitl/Gaudreau
- doesn’t have an argument based on “carries his team” — he’s plainly behind guys like Shesterkin/Gaudreau/Josi and arguably not really distinguishable from Kyle Connor for that matter.
- doesn’t have an argument based on “straight-up best player” — not even in that conversation
Yes, he’s the top scorer on a good team. That’s the argument. Good for him, he’s having a fantastic season, a career season, possibly setting up for a Cup run. That’s not a Hart argument of any substance, not even compared to a weak winners like Taylor Hall (who was at least demonstrably the best player on his team by a large margin).