Degenerate
Registered User
- Feb 5, 2014
- 587
- 0
I just remembered the Kings won the Cup, so it's all good. I'm sure even Lombardi doesn't really care.
Hart votes:
Varlomov: 256 points (1-8-23-22-9)
Rask: 35 points (0-1-2-5-3)
Rask wins the Vezina...
Quick beats Hank once again.
![]()
What exactly did Murray do to win gm of the year? I would have been totally fine with Bergevin given that he got the (at that moment in time) best available player for a 2nd rounder and a prospect. Murray got an injured Robidas and traded a guy who actually showed up in the playoffs without filling the top 6 hole that they already had.
I just remembered the Kings won the Cup, so it's all good. I'm sure even Lombardi doesn't really care.
Yeah but hank was the better goalie.
Because Rag fan says so that's why.
Murray, further proof that the NHL "awards" are little more than a joke. Makes two terribad trades and his team loses in the 2nd round even though they were supposed to be the best team out of the west according to the same yammering simps that voted for him to win the award.
Face saving much?
Another year where the losers get the "atta boy" awards and the champions win the real thing. I promise you this, every player in the game knows who the best GM is, who the best coach is and who the best team was this year and we are all fans of that team.
Murray, further proof that the NHL "awards" are little more than a joke. Makes two terribad trades and his team loses in the 2nd round even though they were supposed to be the best team out of the west according to the same yammering simps that voted for him to win the award.
Face saving much?
Another year where the losers get the "atta boy" awards and the champions win the real thing. I promise you this, every player in the game knows who the best GM is, who the best coach is and who the best team was this year and we are all fans of that team.
I'm not trying to defend Murray although he did a good job (I probably would've chosen Bergevin or Lombardi tbh), but the GM of the Year award is voted by the GMs, plus 5 execs, plus 5 media members, for those of you who don't know.
So basically what I'm saying: an award voted by NHL GMs is going to be flawed, because half the GMs in the league are borderline Pejorative Slured. If you're pissed, take it up with them.
When was the last time the coach of the year won the Stanley Cup?
Mike Gillis got a vote. 'Nough said.
What exactly did Murray do to win gm of the year? I would have been totally fine with Bergevin given that he got the (at that moment in time) best available player for a 2nd rounder and a prospect. Murray got an injured Robidas and traded a guy who actually showed up in the playoffs without filling the top 6 hole that they already had.
A question for anyone. Off the top of your head, do you remember who won GM of the year last year? 2 years ago? 10 years ago?