BHawk21
Registered User
- Mar 21, 2022
- 2,563
- 1,650
Do you think there are different degrees to this hit? This wasnt Hatcher on Roenick.It was a jumping elbow to the jaw that injured the other teams best player. Think harder.
Do you think there are different degrees to this hit? This wasnt Hatcher on Roenick.It was a jumping elbow to the jaw that injured the other teams best player. Think harder.
Yes, this is a 1 or 2 game suspension vs a 3-5 gamer. Could have been worse, but could have been avoided.Do you think there are different degrees to this hit? This wasnt Hatcher on Roenick.
Seven games in 99 is like a forty game suspension in 2024.Do you think there are different degrees to this hit? This wasnt Hatcher on Roenick.
So yes you agree there can be different degrees of a high hit. Some can be a minor penalty some can be a 7 game suspension. You are saying he should get how many games? I am saying I think a minor penalty covers it. Thats it. Your not going to change my mind. I am sorry. You can move on.Seven games in 99 is like a forty game suspension in 2024.
Who wouldn't agree that there's different degrees of high hits? What a nothing argument. Drai should get 2-3 games if Barkov misses time. I think he'll get a fine.So yes you agree there can be different degrees of a high hit. Some can be a minor penalty some can be a 7 game suspension. You are saying he should get how many games? I am saying I think a minor penalty covers it. Thats it. Your not going to change my mind. I am sorry. You can move on.
You think Draisaitl should get three games for that hit. pfff.Who wouldn't agree that there's different degrees of high hits? What a nothing argument. Drai should get 2-3 games if Barkov misses time. I think he'll get a fine.
You're just as free to move on. I'll keep telling you how and why you're wrong if you choose not too.
Hell of an argument.You think Draisaitl should get three games for that hit. pfff.
You're talking to talk last. Have a good one my guy.Just shocking.
I agree. The hit was high and the call on the ice was appropriate.Ok, I dont think it was that egregious.
Not a chance. He didn't return to the game. If he was faking he wouldn't have missed a shift.I agree. The hit was high and the call on the ice was appropriate.
I do think there was some acting involved. Barkov made absolutely certain that the ref call a penalty on the play.
I agree. The hit was high and the call on the ice was appropriate.
I do think there was some acting involved. Barkov made absolutely certain that the ref call a penalty on the play.
Might be one of the stupidest things said on this board, and thats saying something.I agree. The hit was high and the call on the ice was appropriate.
I do think there was some acting involved. Barkov made absolutely certain that the ref call a penalty on the play.
Has the Joe Biden disease. Just gets dumber and dumber.Your posts just get more and more ridiculous over time.
Dude missed the last ten minutes of a SCF game that was 2-1. He's their best player. What a nonsensical take.I agree. The hit was high and the call on the ice was appropriate.
I do think there was some acting involved. Barkov made absolutely certain that the ref call a penalty on the play.
LOLI agree. The hit was high and the call on the ice was appropriate.
I do think there was some acting involved. Barkov made absolutely certain that the ref call a penalty on the play.
Yeah, I don't get this. It's not like he pulled a Smith and miraculously recovered from a sniper shot within five seconds of a penalty being called on Shaw.Dude missed the last ten minutes of a SCF game that was 2-1. He's their best player. What a nonsensical take.
I agree hes not acting but you are saying that in this SCF game that the oilers are down by 1 with 9 min left in the offensive zone that Draisaitl had intent to injure and was head hunting.Dude missed the last ten minutes of a SCF game that was 2-1. He's their best player. What a nonsensical take.
I don't argue intent because it's impossible to prove. You can look at a jumping elbow and decide that's a suspendable hit because it violates these rules which are cut and dry.I agree hes not acting but you are saying that in this SCF game that the oilers are down by 1 with 5 min left in the offensive zone that Draisaitl had intent to injure and was head hunting.
Couldnt score against Bob game 1 with a couple defensive errors and then Florida smothered them game 2.I’m working for 6 of these 7 scheduled SCF games and it’s killing me. I might be able to watch tomorrow night.
Dirty play by Drai, he should be suspended.
What’s going on with the Oilers why are they down 2-0??
Can you argue jumping when a foots still on the ice at the point of contact?I don't argue intent because it's impossible to prove. You can look at a jumping elbow and decide that's a suspendable hit because it violates these rules which are cut and dry.
The Panthers are suffocating them and outside of McDrai they don't have the depth scoring to compete when their PP isn't scoring.I’m working for 6 of these 7 scheduled SCF games and it’s killing me. I might be able to watch tomorrow night.
Dirty play by Drai, he should be suspended.
What’s going on with the Oilers why are they down 2-0??
Brother you're arguing that an elbow to the jaw isn't a headshot.Couldnt score against Bob game 1 with a couple defensive errors and then Florida smothered them game 2.
Can you argue jumping when a foots still on the ice at the point of contact?
After up and down 1st round and game 1 vs B's he has been absolute brick wall since outside of one game and has been getting better as playoffs have gone along
Vs TB = 4-1 with .896 sv pct
Vs Bos = 4-2 with .906 sv pct
Vs NYR = 4-2 with .920 sv pct + 1 SO
Vs Edm = 2-0 with .980 sv pct + 1 SO
Since the game 1 loss to B's in which he gave up 4 goals, Bob has over next 13 games given up
5 goals = 1 time (OT loss)
2 goals = 6 times (OT loss in one of those games)
1 goal = 4 times
0 goals = 2 times
Bob over last 13 games
10-3 with .930 sv pct and 2 SO's
Right now, Panthers have a few guys in running for playoff MVP with no one running away with it. Should they prevail someone of that group would get it and if Bob finishes off the finals strong, he certainly has far better case then your giving him
LOL.....I doubt there's a single NHL player who has faced Bob in these playoffs would agree with you. Of course it isn't over yet but it's odd timing for this as well as Bob has looked more and more solid as the POs have progressed. He just stole game 1 of the final and is clearly in Oilers shooters head.