Joe McGrath
Registered User
- Oct 29, 2009
- 18,409
- 39,428
Tim Gleason placed on buyout waivers.
The return of #timgleson
isn't there golf or some important ACC happening going on? maybe a scrabble tournament? they are busy.
I actually wouldn't mind that for a reasonable contract.
Would anyone else take him for ~$2mil a year, maybe 2 years?
Just to be contrarian... if RF doesn't see any UFAs that he and Peters desperately want then why clear cap space at all costs.
McBain not even qualified. Hoo boy.
Tim Gleason placed on buyout waivers.
It appears Luke is too busy judging from afar:
Luke DeCock @LukeDeCock 50s
Unfortunately, given the lack of movement so far this summer, feels like the new regime could be falling into the same trap.
.
Luke is right. If JR was still the GM you guys would probably be collectively bemoaning how little on this roster actually stands to change, but since it's Francis and the shiny new toy syndrome hasn't worn away it's business as usual. Same with the draft that looked remarkably like a JR draft with a few deviations. Keeping Ward when Calgary reportedly had some level of interest is absurd. I don't care if you have to retain to get it done. It needed to happen.
You guys are being satisfied by words and that's unfortunate after so many years of futility. Look at what Yzerman is doing in Tampa. Agree or disagree with the individual moves he has made, it represents a vision he has for his team. Where is the vision here, aside from emphasizing the same pieces and hoping for a different result?
Luke is right. If JR was still the GM you guys would probably be collectively bemoaning how little on this roster actually stands to change, but since it's Francis and the shiny new toy syndrome hasn't worn away it's business as usual. Same with the draft that looked remarkably like a JR draft with a few deviations. Keeping Ward when Calgary reportedly had some level of interest is absurd. I don't care if you have to retain to get it done. It needed to happen.
You guys are being satisfied by words and that's unfortunate after so many years of futility. Look at what Yzerman is doing in Tampa. Agree or disagree with the individual moves he has made, it represents a vision he has for his team. Where is the vision here, aside from emphasizing the same pieces and hoping for a different result?
Maybe if Luke actually looked into things we could get a clearer picture as to what is happening. So far all we're getting out of him is pure speculation that we're not going to do anything.Luke is right. If JR was still the GM you guys would probably be collectively bemoaning how little on this roster actually stands to change, but since it's Francis and the shiny new toy syndrome hasn't worn away it's business as usual. Same with the draft that looked remarkably like a JR draft with a few deviations. Keeping Ward when Calgary reportedly had some level of interest is absurd. I don't care if you have to retain to get it done. It needed to happen.
You guys are being satisfied by words and that's unfortunate after so many years of futility. Look at what Yzerman is doing in Tampa. Agree or disagree with the individual moves he has made, it represents a vision he has for his team. Where is the vision here, aside from emphasizing the same pieces and hoping for a different result?
Luke is right. If JR was still the GM you guys would probably be collectively bemoaning how little on this roster actually stands to change, but since it's Francis and the shiny new toy syndrome hasn't worn away it's business as usual. Same with the draft that looked remarkably like a JR draft with a few deviations. Keeping Ward when Calgary reportedly had some level of interest is absurd. I don't care if you have to retain to get it done. It needed to happen.
You guys are being satisfied by words and that's unfortunate after so many years of futility. Look at what Yzerman is doing in Tampa. Agree or disagree with the individual moves he has made, it represents a vision he has for his team. Where is the vision here, aside from emphasizing the same pieces and hoping for a different result?
Luke is right. If JR was still the GM you guys would probably be collectively bemoaning how little on this roster actually stands to change, but since it's Francis and the shiny new toy syndrome hasn't worn away it's business as usual. Same with the draft that looked remarkably like a JR draft with a few deviations. Keeping Ward when Calgary reportedly had some level of interest is absurd. I don't care if you have to retain to get it done. It needed to happen.
You guys are being satisfied by words and that's unfortunate after so many years of futility. Look at what Yzerman is doing in Tampa. Agree or disagree with the individual moves he has made, it represents a vision he has for his team. Where is the vision here, aside from emphasizing the same pieces and hoping for a different result?
Regarding the bolded -- it was known in advance that this essentially WAS a Rutherford draft. He still worked here until three weeks ago. Presumably he was guiding Francis through the process until he left for Pittsburgh. Francis came out and said clearly that this would be the last draft under the old vision, and that strategic changes would begin going forward.
We don't know how much the roster stands to change. It's not even 7/1 yet. Keeping Ward may make sense within the context of the UFA market -- we'll know when we see what kind of deals are signed by ourselves and others.
IMO it's much too early in this process to say that Francis lacks a vision. The only thing that he's actually done to date is hire a coach, manage a Rutherford-legacy draft, and let a handful of guys go to free agency.