ReggieDunlop68
hey hanrahan!
We could have picked our next Boo Nieves, a.k.a. BooTwo, with that second pick. In Gorton We Trust? HA!
You just wait until Boo becomes a somewhat reliable but of course still non-productive 4th liner, who'll be laughing then???We could have picked our next Boo Nieves, a.k.a. BooTwo, with that second pick. In Gorton We Trust? HA!
You just wait until Boo becomes a somewhat reliable but of course still non-productive 4th liner, who'll be laughing then???
You just wait until Boo becomes a somewhat reliable but of course still non-productive 4th liner, who'll be laughing then???
I'd rather keep Shattenkirk than Staal or Smith and hell, all things being equal, Pionk
Blair "Black hole" Betts. FTW !!!!!!
I'd rather keep Shattenkirk than Staal or Smith and hell, all things being equal, Pionk
Mathieu Schneider became a pretty serviceable top 4 D man for a few years and played a game similar to Pionk. I'd hate to give up on a player like that because he didn't set the world on fire coming out of the gates. Especially coming from a short schedule like the NCAA instead of Major Jr's.
And Shattenkirk has been an undeniable pile of ****. There is no need top dive into deep analytics to debate him.
Pionk and Shattenkirk pack your **** please
He was the best roster acquisition of the 2004 fire sale.
Betts >>>>>>>>> Immonen + Balej
Thought it was 31 games, no? I know it's nit-picky. But are we for-sure the condition is triggered at game 30?Fox plays 30 NHL games next season - 2nd
Fox does not - 3rd
Yeah, same here. I'd play the three guys from last year and let the logjam work itself out. It always does. Hopefully the guys build up some value and a trade offer materializes. Also serves the dual purposes of letting Fox adjust in the AHL for half a season and keeping the draft pick condition from triggering.I think Pionk will be ok as a 3RD. Hes not the kind of talent who can take on top-6 forwards as a 23 year old rookie, which is how he got used this year. But he could log competent minutes against bottom-6 guys. As he matures, may be better. There's no reason to think he won't be better.
It has to, unless Fox isn't playing off the bat (I think he will) or Pionk is used as an extra.
The only other options would be to Move/buy out Shattenkirk (which would leave us very small and inexperienced on the right side) or to trade DeAngelo (which would be dumb)
why is it automatically dumb?
wouldn't it be better with an open mind to see what that return is, esp since quality RDs are in short supply?
best case scenario, no good trades for a young stud RD available.
the other moves I wanna make get done, our Fs are ready to kick it, our LDs emerge, EK65 hangs with Hank for a yr healthy Shatty is 2RD before Fox is ready to switch w/him.
That's our 3.
Pionk moved or he is 4RD.
Or, other scenario, no 1 yr EK, then:
Shatty
Fox
Pionk [hopefully plays better w/less mins] or alternate
We would not be cutting Deangelo, but getting something for him.
Well, we need to expose someone at the expansion draft. I would keep Pionk for that. The problem is, with ADA and Fox (and Shattenkirk most likely), there’s no room for him on the right side. Maybe trade Pionk and sign a veteran depth d-man when the time comes? Or is that not allowed? Do you have to expose a d-man that’s been on the team for at least 2 years or something?This move should spell the end for Pionk here.
It probably won't, but it really should.
Well, we need to expose someone at the expansion draft. I would keep Pionk for that. The problem is, with ADA and Fox (and Shattenkirk most likely), there’s no room for him on the right side. Maybe trade Pionk and sign a veteran depth d-man when the time comes? Or is that not allowed? Do you have to expose a d-man that’s been on the team for at least 2 years or something?
But I thought you had to expose at least one d-man whose contract isn’t expiring and who played at least 40 games the past year or something. If we protect ADA, Skjei, and Hajek, then who will we have left to expose that meets that criteria? Maybe Lindgren if he gets to play full-time with the big club.IIRC you can expose guys who are UFA's to be.
Staal, Smith, Shatty will all be expiring after the expansion draft.
They can just sign a defensive equivalent to Grabner, that contract was basically structured to be exposed in the expansion draftBut I thought you had to expose at least one d-man whose contract isn’t expiring and who played at least 40 games the past year or something. If we protect ADA, Skjei, and Hajek, then who will we have left to expose that meets that criteria? Maybe Lindgren if he gets to play full-time with the big club.
They didn't even draft him. I could understand more if it was Flames fans.the carolina board is comic gold.
lots a saltinesss.
i think this kid will thrive here.
think tyson barrie type player.
Trading DeAngelo would be dumb.why is it automatically dumb?
wouldn't it be better with an open mind to see what that return is, esp since quality RDs are in short supply?
best case scenario, no good trades for a young stud RD available.
the other moves I wanna make get done, our Fs are ready to kick it, our LDs emerge, EK65 hangs with Hank for a yr healthy Shatty is 2RD before Fox is ready to switch w/him.
That's our 3.
Pionk moved or he is 4RD.
Or, other scenario, no 1 yr EK, then:
Shatty
Fox
Pionk [hopefully plays better w/less mins] or alternate
We would not be cutting Deangelo, but getting something for him.