OT: New Owner! New Name? New Season? New Everything!!! — Oh, and New Thread. All things Washington NFL FootBall (beat it, Dan-Bag!!)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
The fact that the Ravens were up 14 on a awful Browns team and somehow managed to lose is highly comical.

Big gain by Bates.

ROFL

He was gone for MILES. No one NEAR him! Big TD!

f***ing dumb kick
 
The fact that the Ravens were up 14 on an awful Browns team and somehow managed to lose is highly comical.
Awful?!?!? They had the number one defense in the league by a reasonable amount coming into this game. They are 6-3 now, and that is with their backup QB starting 2 games and playing a reasonable amount in a 3rd game. What the f*** are you talking about?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedRocking
The whole reason for the "2 PFs for an ejection" is the idea that a non-intentional but dangerous PF to the head shouldn't be an automatic ejection. If Forbes had specifically targeted the head or done something egregious, then maybe an ejection is warranted. But this call invalidates the entire rationale for the rules as they are written...
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Price
The whole reason for the "2 PFs for an ejection" is the idea that a non-intentional but dangerous PF to the head shouldn't be an automatic ejection. If Forbes had specifically targeted the head or done something egregious, then maybe an ejection is warranted. But this call invalidates the entire rationale for the rules as they are written...
Someone should be an adult and stop New York from using slo-mo on a hit like that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad