OT: New Owner! New Name? New Season? New Everything!!! — Oh, and New Thread. All things Washington NFL FootBall (beat it, Dan-Bag!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.

John Price

Gang Gang
Sep 19, 2008
385,623
30,806
The fact that the Ravens were up 14 on a awful Browns team and somehow managed to lose is highly comical.

Big gain by Bates.

ROFL

He was gone for MILES. No one NEAR him! Big TD!

f***ing dumb kick
 

Ajax1995

Registered User
Dec 9, 2002
8,908
938
The fact that the Ravens were up 14 on an awful Browns team and somehow managed to lose is highly comical.
Awful?!?!? They had the number one defense in the league by a reasonable amount coming into this game. They are 6-3 now, and that is with their backup QB starting 2 games and playing a reasonable amount in a 3rd game. What the f*** are you talking about?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedRocking

Eirikrautha

Registered User
May 5, 2018
935
832
RVA
The whole reason for the "2 PFs for an ejection" is the idea that a non-intentional but dangerous PF to the head shouldn't be an automatic ejection. If Forbes had specifically targeted the head or done something egregious, then maybe an ejection is warranted. But this call invalidates the entire rationale for the rules as they are written...
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Price

usiel

Where wolf’s ears are, wolf’s teeth are near.
Sponsor
Jul 29, 2002
15,988
4,791
Klendathu
www.myspace.com
The whole reason for the "2 PFs for an ejection" is the idea that a non-intentional but dangerous PF to the head shouldn't be an automatic ejection. If Forbes had specifically targeted the head or done something egregious, then maybe an ejection is warranted. But this call invalidates the entire rationale for the rules as they are written...
Someone should be an adult and stop New York from using slo-mo on a hit like that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad