New Accusations Edmonton Oilers owner Daryl Katz paid for sex with a teenager.

Status
Not open for further replies.

snag

Registered User
Feb 22, 2014
10,001
11,266
What about the title is incorrect?

Well....it is no longer new nor is it active.

The only reason to try and justify keeping is...well....if you are a person like you so heavily invested in dragging a guy through the mud you have no currency left to retract.
 

PostBradMalone

Registered User
Mar 19, 2022
2,883
6,256
Pretty much everything since there is nothing saying he had sex with the girl

Well....it is no longer new nor is it active.

The only reason to try and justify keeping is...well....if you are a person like you so heavily invested in dragging a guy through the mud you have no currency left to retract.

Neither of you actually read what was amended did you lmao?
 

PostBradMalone

Registered User
Mar 19, 2022
2,883
6,256
Apparently you're incapable of understanding.

1 - The accusers couldn't get the girls age right
2 - Girl said nothing inappropriate took place
3 - Katz issued statement about payment.

The first is the only new information, and it doesn’t change the title in any respect.

Sounds like your tired of taking it on the chin all day

And it sounds like you’re tired of spending your free time white knighting without any sort of compensation for a pervy billionaire who will never know who you are. It’s only a less slightly weird hobby than sending teenagers tens of thousands of dollars for dubious purposes.

Amended where? The title? The OP? The article?

Not seeing an amendment nor am I gonna hunt for one ...show me.

I thought not lmao.
 

Gordon Lightfoot

Hey Dotcom. Nice to meet you.
Sponsor
Feb 3, 2009
18,949
5,430
They're not, and in fact a couple of Oilers board members suggested in our thread on this topic that they would be okay with Katz texting their own teenage daughters icky stuff like "You're so perfect" and then sending them money for dubious purposes solely because he's rich. If that's what some people are willing to admit in public, I can't imagine the stuff that actually happens behind closed doors.
What?!?!
 

Oilslick941611

Registered User
Jul 4, 2006
17,677
18,712
Ottawa
so many pitch forks were out and ready WITH ZERO evidence or credible accusations, Many people in this thread look like fools for voraciously attacking/demeaning and letting wild accusations fly against Katz with the flimsiest of threads.

Critical thinking, what happened to that these days?
 

Oilslick941611

Registered User
Jul 4, 2006
17,677
18,712
Ottawa
I'm always amazed how people can't stand people like Katz and Dan Snyder, pull a 180 and support them when stuff like this comes to light.
when what comes to light? The accusations never came from Humphries, she denied them, Katz denied them and nw the Buttons have withdrawn them.

What they're doing is vicariously defending either their own prior conduct or conduct they can imagine themselves engaging in.
no, its called believing the so called victim when she denies the accusations and now that Buttons ( the real sickos in all this) have withdrawn the "accusations" a lot of people look foolish right now
 

Zach716

Pucks in deep
Nov 24, 2018
4,445
5,027
so many pitch forks were out and ready WITH ZERO evidence or credible accusations, Many people in this thread look like fools for voraciously attacking/demeaning and letting wild accusations fly against Katz with the flimsiest of threads.

Critical thinking, what happened to that these days?
My guess is identity politics. For some people of a particular political leaning Katz fits into multiple subgroups that they don't like. It's an easy way to attack, regardless of facts.
 

67 others

Registered User
Jul 30, 2010
3,064
2,355
Moose country
when what comes to light? The accusations never came from Humphries, she denied them, Katz denied them and nw the Buttons have withdrawn them.


no, its called believing the so called victim when she denies the accusations and now that Buttons ( the real sickos in all this) have withdrawn the "accusations" a lot of people look foolish right now
The buttons basically were complaining the media attention was ruining their business and found a way to deflect media attention off themselves on to someone unrelated to their case. An NHL owner is a more interesting story than 2 Ballerina school owners.

In any case, its all been baseless. The victim of the buttons whom the buttons sickoes made the claim for, said it was all BS, and the buttons who claimed she entered a consensual sexual relationship with them the day she turned 18 and that she initiated it. That was their defense against her allegations of their abuse. The victim vindicated Katz of these claims and said the buttons were doing it to deflect the media scrutiny.

Now the Buttons, upon having no evidence, just realized they made claims this stuff happened after she turned 18 and they got her age wrong and they didn't even have their fake case left to push this agenda with.

Katz is innocent and completely vindicated of the baseless charges. They have been dropped. Case closed. Anyone still pushing pitchforks at this point just doesn't want to see reality.
 

PostBradMalone

Registered User
Mar 19, 2022
2,883
6,256
And what do I find but PostBradMalone still making mob mentality accusations when it’s clearly been determined that Sage and Katz had a business relationship not sexual. Just admit your faults and go home Brad. It’s over.

I’m going to quote myself since you clearly haven’t done this either:

That’s not what the amendments to the complaint were. Try reading before furiously white knighting.

I wish you all would keep your perversions to our board at least, it would be way less embarrassing.
 

Spawn

Something in the water
Feb 20, 2006
44,619
17,389
Edmonton
That’s not what the amendments to the complaint were. Try reading before furiously white knighting.

Here is a quote from the lawyer who initially filed the accusations.

"I want to personally apologize for any harm the erroneous factual claims may have caused to Mr. Katz and his family," Randazza wrote in an email to Sportsnet. "We brought the claims in good faith, but the moment I doubted the ability to maintain them, I took corrective action and asked the court to strike all relevant references from the record.

"Nobody should repeat those allegations in any context without noting that they have been withdrawn and repudiated."


I'm not even quite sure what you're talking about anymore to be honest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oilslick941611

PostBradMalone

Registered User
Mar 19, 2022
2,883
6,256
Here is a quote from the lawyer who initially filed the accusations.




I'm not even quite sure what you're talking about anymore to be honest.

Yes and what part of the allegations were amended? Hint: it’s not all of them, just a specific element. Try engaging your skills of comprehension, I know you can do it.
 

Spawn

Something in the water
Feb 20, 2006
44,619
17,389
Edmonton
Yes and what part of the allegations were amended? Hint: it’s not all of them, just a specific element. Try engaging your skills of comprehension, I know you can do it.

Randazza also filed on Wednesday a “notice of voluntary dismissal” of their claims against Katz. Sportsnet has reviewed copies of both the motion and the notice.

Again... not quite sure what you're talking about.

Feel free to provide a link or a quote that you're seeing that no one else has.
 
  • Like
Reactions: capazzo

Soundwave

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
75,048
31,337
Yes and what part of the allegations were amended? Hint: it’s not all of them, just a specific element. Try engaging your skills of comprehension, I know you can do it.

All of them, they say straight up the allegations shouldn't repeated in ANY CONTEXT without noting that they have been withdrawn.

A withdrawn allegation is what? Nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: capazzo
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad