flyershockey
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2006
- 13,723
- 6,888
I was just sitting here wondering what the YPA was for him. Clemson has no faith in either Klubnik or his receivers.Klubnik’s averaging 3.5 YPP. Woof.
I was just sitting here wondering what the YPA was for him. Clemson has no faith in either Klubnik or his receivers.Klubnik’s averaging 3.5 YPP. Woof.
I was just sitting here wondering what the YPA was for him. Clemson has no faith in either Klubnik or his receivers.
Phew, for now.I don’t know if they’re right yet or not, but Duke is telling you they think they can play these Clemson WRs straight up. Duke.
Oh f*** me. No. Please no. Let it be another Manning. Archie, Cooper, Danny, whatever.
Phew, for now.
Phew, for now.
I want a permanent third that promotes more discussion and analysis. You might like him or hate him but I liked it when Phil Mickelson was a guest cause he was asking questions that I would ask. Otherwise no gimmicks and no McAfeee. More doggos would be a huge plus plus.
This weeks score
1. @Beef Invictus 78
2. Asnito 75
3. @Captain Dave Poulin 66
4. @renberg 57
5. @LegionOfDoom91 51
6. @BackToTheBrierePatch 45
7. @Cody Webster 37
8. @dragonoffrost 0
I'm feeding you the games to bet onHeyyyy and I'm not even cheesing it.
You have no clue how annoying it is to habitually get this thing right, only to lose all my bets like I just did. What is wrong with me
That’s a very interesting house dividedTough game in our house this week-Badgers(me) vs. Wazzu(wife). If I go with WI, I’m really going to hear it if it goes the other way like happened last year.