herzausstein
Registered User
Shudders
So if Del Gaizo replaces Josi....
Del Gaizo Schenn
Skjei Blankenburg
Englund Barron
So if Del Gaizo replaces Josi....
Del Gaizo Schenn
Skjei Blankenburg
Englund Barron
Del Gaizo up, Livingstone down
This team gave away Fabbro and Carrier for free in the last four monthsShudders
So if Del Gaizo replaces Josi....
Del Gaizo Schenn
Skjei Blankenburg
Englund Barron
Still dont mind Carrier shouldve traded him last deadline and kept Fabbro and played him.This team gave away Fabbro and Carrier for free in the last four months
Should have never signed him to that contract. Liked the deal to Montreal, though. Fabbro, tho...Still dont mind Carrier shouldve traded him last deadline and kept Fabbro and played him.
Somebody f'ed up last time... we need better...Early puck drop so someone needs to step up for the GDT...
That 3rd in 2027 we got for him don't seem so bad now, eh?Poor Jussö just got traded.![]()
Vesey to the Avs.Poor Jussö just got traded.![]()
The Avs got 2 veterans and a prospect for him (and he headlines that trade). So yeah, it actually doesn't look that great.That 3rd in 2027 we got for him don't seem so bad now, eh?
The Avs paid in picks. Is he really more than a roster spot going the other way to balance out contracts?Vesey to the Avs.
The Avs got 2 veterans and a prospect for him (and he headlines that trade). So yeah, it actually doesn't look that great.
The picks headline the trade, not Parssinen.Vesey to the Avs.
The Avs got 2 veterans and a prospect for him (and he headlines that trade). So yeah, it actually doesn't look that great.
I meant in terms of players and the way the trade has popped up on the feeds: "Lindgren + 2 for Parssinen +3". It's fine if we want to say Parsinnen had no value in this trade.The picks headline the trade, not Parssinen.
He pretty much didn't. Yeah, he was the first name mentioned and so I was similarly apprehensive at first, but given that NYR's getting the earlier of two 2nds Colorado has (either Colorado's, or sending NYR's back to them), it's pretty clear that's the key asset and he's just a throw-in.I meant in terms of players and the way the trade has popped up on the feeds: "Lindgren + 2 for Parssinen +3". It's fine if we want to say Parsinnen had no value in this trade.
I think the entire trade qualifies as a sell for the Rangers. They got rid of 2 UFAs and an unsigned prospect (a real toss in) for 2 players and 2 picks. DeHaan is a UFA as well, so he's clearly a toss in and balances the 2 players for 2 players roster spots.He pretty much didn't. Yeah, he was the first name mentioned and so I was similarly apprehensive at first, but given that NYR's getting the earlier of two 2nds Colorado has (either Colorado's, or sending NYR's back to them), it's pretty clear that's the key asset and he's just a throw-in.
I think that's good for him. Well, it can't be any worse at least... he really didn't get much of a look in Colorado, always just on the 4th line with plugs it seems. I mean, better than the pressbox here, but still. Hopefully the Rangers have a regular spot for him.Poor Jussö just got traded.![]()
Yes it wouldWith our retention slots, one is tied up with RyJo, right? So if his contract is terminated, as requested, would that give it back to us? I wonder if Trotz has gotten a signal it will be, and that's why he was comfortable giving up our "last" slot
Snipped a bunch of a good doom post. Kudos.The announcers are saying the team and Trotz is hoping for a bounceback year next year.
My question is, HOW?
Well, when you put it that way.........Only 268 more games of Stamkos and 514 more games of Skjei!
Not directed at you personally as I can't remember each persons point of view, but welcome to tanking. Seriously, for anyone who wanted to tank to win a Cup this is the level of play you can expect to see for the next 4-5 years. If you can't handle that then you have zero business talking about tanking ever again.When Trotz came in to replace Poile and they decided to blow the team up, there was excitement in the air. We had some youth ready to blossom and more being drafted. We saw potential in guys like Parssinen, Glass, Tomasino, Evangelista and knew they could be followed by guys like Svechkov, ZLH, Kemell and Askarov and then add in the newer rounds of guys like Wood, Molendyk and now Surin, Stiga and some others.
At other points we had guys that were tough to play against on this team in Olivier, Trenin, Jeannot coupled with Sissons. It was fun to watch as these guys knew how to set the tone on the ice. I'm certainly not advocating that we should've kept these guys, especially the haul we got for Jeannot, but we moved on from them for whatever reason.
So all this hope of this roster being changed from the past to the future gave a reason for hope. Now, two years later, I'm not so sure. We've got an old and declining top 6. We've got a bottom 6 that is full of AHL talent that the team and announcers seem to want to say, hey, these guys have been tearing it up in the minors, they're being rewarded for their play. Guys like Bellows and Lucchini have no place in the NHL. Same could be said for a bunch of other guys in the bottom 6.
Here's my frustration, the youth we were excited about and hoped to be in the lineup is now elsewhere. The few guys that are still here aren't progressing as expected. The pipeline from Milwaukee is basically dry outside of Kemell since Stastney has been called up. The guys we've drafted are still a few years away. The announcers are saying the team and Trotz is hoping for a bounceback year next year. I haven't even touched on the defense corp either.
My question is, HOW? Say we relieve Bruno and replace him with a different coach and we keep the same general roster for next year, we've got Forsberg, ROR, March, Stamkos, Novak, Vange, ZLH, Svechkov, Sissons, McC, Smith and Jank. Maybe Kemell makes the team. This isn't a roster that is terribly exciting. It's easy to play against, even if we were to change systems and have a coach that knows what they're doing.
While the potential of a top pick to land a 1C is exciting, does that player come in and provide any sort of impact? Would it help get Stamkos back on track? Does it elevate Forsberg to another level?
I don't know peeps. I'm just not excited about this team right now. Say we move some of these guys like ROR and Sissons and Novak or whoever, who takes their spot on the roster, more AHL fodder, cause that's exciting, said no one ever. We keep hearing the team needs to play the kids, yet guys like McC and Smith get more ice time than them. The roster construction and decisions we've made are absolutely horrendous. 4 of the 7 dmen we had to start the season are either gone or on IR.
I was optimistic with all the draft capital we had, the youth we had coming up and basically I'm looking at the rest of this year and next and go, this is a train wreck that's only going to get way worse before it gets better. Maybe we land Hagens or Misa this year. Maybe we suck so bad next year we can pick up McKenna. Maybe, just maybe we have something to build around in that scenario. Our luck would be having the 1OA or 2OA this year, having one of two centers to choose from and we pick Schaeffer instead, that's just what I could this inept organization doing.
Not sure I feel any better after typing this all out but all hope and optimism has been replaced by having to earn my trust back by the franchise.