herzausstein
Registered User
Shudders
So if Del Gaizo replaces Josi....
Del Gaizo Schenn
Skjei Blankenburg
Englund Barron
So if Del Gaizo replaces Josi....
Del Gaizo Schenn
Skjei Blankenburg
Englund Barron
Del Gaizo up, Livingstone down
This team gave away Fabbro and Carrier for free in the last four monthsShudders
So if Del Gaizo replaces Josi....
Del Gaizo Schenn
Skjei Blankenburg
Englund Barron
Still dont mind Carrier shouldve traded him last deadline and kept Fabbro and played him.This team gave away Fabbro and Carrier for free in the last four months
Should have never signed him to that contract. Liked the deal to Montreal, though. Fabbro, tho...Still dont mind Carrier shouldve traded him last deadline and kept Fabbro and played him.
Somebody f'ed up last time... we need better...Early puck drop so someone needs to step up for the GDT...
That 3rd in 2027 we got for him don't seem so bad now, eh?Poor Jussö just got traded.![]()
Vesey to the Avs.Poor Jussö just got traded.![]()
The Avs got 2 veterans and a prospect for him (and he headlines that trade). So yeah, it actually doesn't look that great.That 3rd in 2027 we got for him don't seem so bad now, eh?
The Avs paid in picks. Is he really more than a roster spot going the other way to balance out contracts?Vesey to the Avs.
The Avs got 2 veterans and a prospect for him (and he headlines that trade). So yeah, it actually doesn't look that great.
The picks headline the trade, not Parssinen.Vesey to the Avs.
The Avs got 2 veterans and a prospect for him (and he headlines that trade). So yeah, it actually doesn't look that great.
I meant in terms of players and the way the trade has popped up on the feeds: "Lindgren + 2 for Parssinen +3". It's fine if we want to say Parsinnen had no value in this trade.The picks headline the trade, not Parssinen.
He pretty much didn't. Yeah, he was the first name mentioned and so I was similarly apprehensive at first, but given that NYR's getting the earlier of two 2nds Colorado has (either Colorado's, or sending NYR's back to them), it's pretty clear that's the key asset and he's just a throw-in.I meant in terms of players and the way the trade has popped up on the feeds: "Lindgren + 2 for Parssinen +3". It's fine if we want to say Parsinnen had no value in this trade.
I think the entire trade qualifies as a sell for the Rangers. They got rid of 2 UFAs and an unsigned prospect (a real toss in) for 2 players and 2 picks. DeHaan is a UFA as well, so he's clearly a toss in and balances the 2 players for 2 players roster spots.He pretty much didn't. Yeah, he was the first name mentioned and so I was similarly apprehensive at first, but given that NYR's getting the earlier of two 2nds Colorado has (either Colorado's, or sending NYR's back to them), it's pretty clear that's the key asset and he's just a throw-in.
I think that's good for him. Well, it can't be any worse at least... he really didn't get much of a look in Colorado, always just on the 4th line with plugs it seems. I mean, better than the pressbox here, but still. Hopefully the Rangers have a regular spot for him.Poor Jussö just got traded.![]()
Yes it wouldWith our retention slots, one is tied up with RyJo, right? So if his contract is terminated, as requested, would that give it back to us? I wonder if Trotz has gotten a signal it will be, and that's why he was comfortable giving up our "last" slot
Snipped a bunch of a good doom post. Kudos.The announcers are saying the team and Trotz is hoping for a bounceback year next year.
My question is, HOW?