Crow52
Registered User
- Jan 8, 2020
- 66
- 80
Jake Evans to LA. Evans is affordable under their current cap space and a quality bottom six center. What would LA offer Mtl
For the sake of discussionWhy is Montreal trading Evans?
Jake Evans to LA. Evans is affordable under their current cap space and a quality bottom six center. What would LA offer Mtl
To clear a spot for PLD , duh.Why is Montreal trading Evans?
One of Dvorak/Evans need to leave to make room for Kapanen.Why is Montreal trading Evans?
Montreal has Christian Dvorak and Jake Evans as their bottom six centres and if they were to move one of those guys, it would be Dvorak, not Evans, and there's really no reason to do that until much closer to the deadline.
Kings don't need a center.Jake Evans to LA. Evans is affordable under their current cap space and a quality bottom six center. What would LA offer Mtl
Is he? 28 years old, 1.75M and put up 28 points last year while having PK duties.Evans is worth maybe a 4th rounder?
4th round pick for an all defense no offense 4C that’s 28; seems fair.Is he? 28 years old, 1.75M and put up 28 points last year while having PK duties.
If he’s on the market at the TDL I think he would be valuable to a lot of teams as a good two-way 3C or 4C
No offense? At ~30 points I bed to defer. That’s pretty average for a good two-way 3C and best in business as a 4C4th round pick for an all defense no offense 4C that’s 28; seems fair.
Evans to LA makes sense based on what I've read as well, though LA fans know best.
If Dvorak is hard to move and Evans is looking for more $ than Montreal wants to extend him for, he might get moved. I'd rather hope for a 2nd as a rental, but if Montreal needs a C spot to keep Kapanen around, moving Evans might work.
Doesn't mean LA is a great destination for him though. For LA, I see Dvorak as more likely, simply due to the Bergevin factor.
I agree, but it's still a reasonable conversation to have. If LA badly needs a center, maybe the return is there for an immediate move.I don't hate it, just seems unnecessary at this time. Maybe revisit near the deadline, MTL would get more value imo when team needs shake out
No offense? At ~30 points I bed to defer. That’s pretty average for a good two-way 3C and best in business for 4C
This entire discussion is predicated on the fact that Kapanen looks like he could play in the NHL and Beck is right there too, though less pressing because he'll go to Laval and can be called up at will. This is about as off as assessments get lolIt’d be one thing if they had a young player with more upside, to fill the same role. If they had a Peyton Krebs like guy, who will likely end up a very good 3C in another couple of years.
They don’t have that player. So unless they’re acquiring one, or even a Kampf, then there’s no reason to trade him at all.
We already convert center to wingers.I agree, but it's still a reasonable conversation to have. If LA badly needs a center, maybe the return is there for an immediate move.
But can you? Historically speaking these guys go for a premium at the TDL, ranging from 2nd to 1st round picks.This is completely true but also doesn't change the fact that you find those guys in droves at any Minnesota lake beach and can round them up with motorbike chains.
I have no interest in any trade anyways