Proposal: Mtl / LA

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

FerrisRox

"Wanna go, Prettyboy?"
Sep 17, 2003
20,753
13,973
Toronto, Ontario
Jake Evans to LA. Evans is affordable under their current cap space and a quality bottom six center. What would LA offer Mtl

Montreal has Christian Dvorak and Jake Evans as their bottom six centres and if they were to move one of those guys, it would be Dvorak, not Evans, and there's really no reason to do that until much closer to the deadline.
 

UED

Registered User
May 2, 2021
331
224
yea let's trade our 4th line center for a 4th or 5th putting us in a situation where we have to overpay a 2nd for someone else's 4th line center because we have to replace evans and no one else finds it fun to give away their centers just for the thrill of the trade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CristianoRonaldo

viceroy

Registered User
Mar 5, 2011
1,873
931
Montreal suburbs
Montreal has Christian Dvorak and Jake Evans as their bottom six centres and if they were to move one of those guys, it would be Dvorak, not Evans, and there's really no reason to do that until much closer to the deadline.

I say trade Dvorak now for... peanuts to make room for Kapanen. Then trade Evans at the deadline if Beck is ready.
 

Attachments

  • why-not-both-meme.jpg
    why-not-both-meme.jpg
    86.2 KB · Views: 2
  • Like
Reactions: JustAHabFan

pth2

Registered User
Jan 7, 2018
3,444
2,731
Evans to LA makes sense based on what I've read as well, though LA fans know best.

If Dvorak is hard to move and Evans is looking for more $ than Montreal wants to extend him for, he might get moved. I'd rather hope for a 2nd as a rental, but if Montreal needs a C spot to keep Kapanen around, moving Evans might work.

Doesn't mean LA is a great destination for him though. For LA, I see Dvorak as more likely, simply due to the Bergevin factor.
 

Raccoon Jesus

Draft em but don't play em
Oct 30, 2008
62,842
64,842
I.E.
Evans to LA makes sense based on what I've read as well, though LA fans know best.

If Dvorak is hard to move and Evans is looking for more $ than Montreal wants to extend him for, he might get moved. I'd rather hope for a 2nd as a rental, but if Montreal needs a C spot to keep Kapanen around, moving Evans might work.

Doesn't mean LA is a great destination for him though. For LA, I see Dvorak as more likely, simply due to the Bergevin factor.

I don't hate it, just seems unnecessary at this time. Maybe revisit near the deadline, MTL would get more value imo when team needs shake out
 

pth2

Registered User
Jan 7, 2018
3,444
2,731
I don't hate it, just seems unnecessary at this time. Maybe revisit near the deadline, MTL would get more value imo when team needs shake out
I agree, but it's still a reasonable conversation to have. If LA badly needs a center, maybe the return is there for an immediate move.
 

Petes2424

Registered User
Aug 4, 2005
8,411
3,121
It’d be one thing if they had a young player with more upside, to fill the same role. If they had a Peyton Krebs like guy, who will likely end up a very good 3C in another couple of years.

They don’t have that player. So unless they’re acquiring one, or even a Kampf, then there’s no reason to trade him at all.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad