CupsOverCash
Registered User
- Jun 16, 2009
- 16,531
- 7,297
Of course he gets fined. 5 mins or at most 10 min/game misconduct that people wouldn't argue with but a fine? It's because he's playing the leafs...
I forgot what Spezza did to be honest but I know he got 6, Matthews got I think 2 games, Rielly I think was 6 as well, I dont really know what ur trying to get at here with the must have got it form there,Spezza kneeing Pionk and got 6ish games I think and Matthews crosschecked Dahlin in the head/neck. Pretty sure he got a few also..... Must have been where Rielly got it from.....
This is why I find the Bertuzzi/Moore comparisons ridiculous. Xhekaj clearly could have hurt Pare if he wanted to. It was more about doing his job/fulfilling his role and sending a message. And it could've been avoided had the referees simply called a penalty on Pare (or tossed him for his own safety/to defuse tensions)Xhekaj looked angrier at the refs than the Leafs. He pretty much had to respond to the incident, intentional or not, and he did his job. He clearly wasn't trying to hurt Pare. He could have done much more damage. I feel like the wheel of justice actually got this one right for a change.
I forgot what Spezza did to be honest but I know he got 6, Matthews got I think 2 games, Rielly I think was 6 as well, I dont really know what ur trying to get at here with the must have got it form there,
NHL is so all over the place on all these things. maybe they got it from Tom Wilson when he tried to take Buch's dead off when he was on the ground who knows, it was also just a fine
but I dunno I guess it's okay to attack players from behind or do whatever it was Tom Wilson did here. they both are just fines
imo Xhekaj should have been suspended, if you see more of this happen cause its just a 3.5-5k fine, someone is prob going to get real hurt
well yeah, u dont shoot on the other teams goalie after the play is dead, it results in a fight or should most times. but that doesnt mean u go smash him in the face like Rielly did. I really dont know what ur getting at here budInteresting.....Xhekaj should be suspended but Grieg f-ed around and found out and Matthews cross checking Dahlin to the head/neck was good to see.
Life must be so awesome with those blue glasses on.....
The issue Leafs fans have isn't so much with the play itself, rather other teams not being held to the same standard by DOPS. Leafs get the book thrown at them every time they defend themselves or send a message. We were told that Mo's suspension was so long because it:im just sitting laughing at Leafs fans reaction to this. Remember how they felt after a slap shot on an open net? They defending Rielly doing basically the same thing. Now they are crying about fairness and code.
If Wifi really wanted get revenge on the leafs, he would score an empty net slapshot on the leafs.
*not all leaf fans, but who you who you are.
Xhekaj went after Reaves in the opener last year. And after he manhandled him, tossing him around, (while poor Treliving almost cried after clapping like a seal during the pre game intros), Reaves wouldn’t look at him again the rest of the night. He did talk awfully tough in the papers after the game though, I’ll give him that, great for a quote.Leafs are likely happy though because he will be playing in the season opener. He sucks and Reaves is gonna chase him around all game. Have fun..
well yeah, u dont shoot on the other teams goalie after the play is dead, it results in a fight or should most times. but that doesnt mean u go smash him in the face like Rielly did. I really dont know what ur getting at here bud
The issue Leafs fans have isn't so much with the play itself, rather other teams not being held to the same standard by DOPS. Leafs get the book thrown at them every time they defend themselves or send a message. We were told that Mo's suspension was so long because it:
1. Wasn't a hockey play
2. Was committed as an act of retribution
3. The other player's neck/head were targetted while unaware (despite acknowledging that the stick rode up the shoulders into the neck)
I'd say Xhekaj undeniably checked all 3 boxes here.
We're all just sick of the double standards.
While I accept Mr. Rielly's contention that he did not "aim" for Mr. Greig's head, the fact remains that Mr. Rielly raised his stick to the level of Mr. Greig's head and neck and drove it forcefully and intentionally into Mr. Greig as Mr. Rielly skated into Mr. Greig. This is not a case where Mr. Rielly's stick was delivered to the midsection or shoulder and "rode up" to Mr. Greig's head.
Section 1 8.2(d) calls for consideration of the situation of the game, and provides by way of example whether the conduct occurs "late in the game, lopsided score, prior events in the game." Such circumstances may render penalties called by the on-ice officials meaningless, and supplementary discipline may be particularly important in some situations so as to effectively deter future violations.
The situation in this case checks two of the three boxes in the language quoted above. Mr. Rielly illegally cross-checked Mr. Greig with approximately 5 seconds left in the game, and when the opposing team was all but assured victory. Moreover, the conduct occurred after active play had ended following Mr. Greig's goal.
As noted in the suspension video, this is not a case where two Players had been jousting or where Mr. Greig might have otherwise had reason and opportunity to expect or prepare for a forceful blow to his head. Moreover, it appears from the video that after the goal was scored, and as he was moving back up the ice celebrating a game deciding goal, there is no indication that Mr. Greig expected any confrontation at all, much less a cross-check to the side of his head.
whatever, still warranted for him to drop the gloves. but Rielly went and smashed him like a coward.Nice try still blaming Grieg but that is not what happened. Grieg shot the puck into an empty net "disrespectfully" so Reilly crosschecked him in the head/neck You said Grieg f-ed around and found out. pretty much saying its Griegs fault.
Dahlin pushed Matthews down(poor baby) and they went back and fourth and Matthews crosschecked Dahlin in the head. You said it was good to see Matthews standing up for himself.
Pare intentionally knees a player, refuses to fight and then Xhekaj smacks him around a bit and its and freaking the end of the world.....I mean he didnt even drop the gloves....
My point is this. You are clearly biased and make excuses when Leaf guys do nasty stuff but call for much harsher punishment when its another team. Even if its something far less dangerous.
God I hope it's a violent game when they play. I want proper borderline shit going down and get the blood pumping. Hockey is so dull nowadays.The league is inviting Montreal to do something really stupid when these two teams play next, and I can't say it would be undeserved on all sides.
I forgot what Spezza did to be honest but I know he got 6, Matthews got I think 2 games, Rielly I think was 6 as well, I dont really know what ur trying to get at here with the must have got it form there,
NHL is so all over the place on all these things. maybe they got it from Tom Wilson when he tried to take Buch's dead off when he was on the ground who knows, it was also just a fine
but I dunno I guess it's okay to attack players from behind or do whatever it was Tom Wilson did here. they both are just fines
imo Xhekaj should have been suspended, if you see more of this happen cause its just a 3.5-5k fine, someone is prob going to get real hurt
Xhekaj looked angrier at the refs than the Leafs. He pretty much had to respond to the incident, intentional or not, and he did his job. He clearly wasn't trying to hurt Pare. He could have done much more damage. I feel like the wheel of justice actually got this one right for a change.
I used to think that too but then Spezza got 6 for his first offense. I think Matthews got 2 and should have been more so they were more forgiving. Im not sure on Rielly but could have been his first offense getting 6 games. it really is crazy how the standard is all over the place. at times its hard not to think Parros plays favoritisms. should be a set standard for every teamAs you said, judgments really are all over the place, so I get why some people feel the Leafs are being persecuted. The reality is every team is subject to strange rulings. I doubt many of us would've been shocked if X had received a game suspension, but Xhekaj is a first-time offender and got a major and match during the game, which mitigated the supplementary discipline. For what it's worth, in the end he was disciplined and is now on the NHL's radar. Next offence will be a suspension.
I wouldnt mind some good old school hockey but dont really wanna see players attacked from behind or knee on knees. even though I dont think it was intentionalGod I hope it's a violent game when they play. I want proper borderline shit going down and get the blood pumping. Hockey is so dull nowadays.
And? Even if they disagreed, both players in question attacked the head and neck of an unsuspecting playerThese aren't two identical situations.
1. While Toronto contended that the stick "rode up", the NHL did not agree.
No one cares how many powerplay minutes were awarded in a preseason game. You're splitting hairs with how long after the whistle it was. Xhekaj and Pare were not involved in any sort of hockey play at the time of the infraction. You're also trying to make up the difference of a 0 game suspension to a 5 game suspension with this nitpicking.2. The in-game situation was different.
Seeing as Arber Xhekaj received 27 minutes in penalties mid-game, and the Leafs a 7 minute PP, that is something that was incorporated into the calculation of the punishment.
Also, the whistle had blown basically as Arber had grabbed Pare and began fighting/punching, as opposed to 5 seconds after play had ended.
There was no "jousting" from Pare. He declined a fight. After that, any attack on him committed FROM BEHIND should be considered unsuspecting.3. The NHL may have viewed Grieg as more unsuspecting, particularly as there was no contact, injury or infraction of any kind.
Loading…
media.nhl.com
And? Even if they disagreed, both players in question attacked the head and neck of an unsuspecting player
No one cares how many powerplay minutes were awarded in a preseason game. You're splitting hairs with how long after the whistle it was. Xhekaj and Pare were not involved in any sort of hockey play at the time of the infraction. You're also trying to make up the difference of a 0 game suspension to a 5 game suspension with this nitpicking.
There was no "jousting" from Pare. He declined a fight. After that, any attack on him committed FROM BEHIND should be considered unsuspecting.
Yes! Yes! I see where you're going with this (as in, completely off the rails) and I too can spot the striking resemblance (there is no universe where one exists) between the Bertuzzi-Moore incident and the Xhekaj-Pare one: Moore’s career-ender involved a broken neck, concussion, and other physical and emotion injuries that stopped him from ever playing again. Pare's? Well, his career-ender is more about being an untalented scrub who's unlikely to ever make it back to the NHL for other, shall we say, "performance-based" reasons. So yeah, both career-enders - just one was inflicted by a cheap shot, the other by a complete lack of skill.Didn’t Bertuzzi get suspended for multiple years?
no surprise at all you blame the victim (Habs player) in all this and the Leaf was innocent. That proves my point. You made excuses for The Leaf players and tried to blame the victims....but a Habs player roughs up a Leaf after The Leaf player clearly knees their player.whatever, still warranted for him to drop the gloves. but Rielly went and smashed him like a coward.
and yeah I meant what I said, it was good to see him stand up for himself even if what it did was a bitch move.
I watched videos breaking it down and I dont think Pare intentionally kneed him, he shifted his body weight but other than that stood his ground, laine didnt even try to move. he put himself in a dangerous situation. it could have been avoided but I really dont think it was intentional
I dont see how I'm biased at all. if a leaf jumped any player from behind even if he was a hab Id call him a coward too, I called Rielly a coward so I guess I'm biased because I said good to see Matthews stand up for himself? lmao
Of course this was a predatory attack.Suspension is fitting, I don’t see how people can say this was a predatory attack. One game would have also been fine though
In a contact sport that allows fighting this is not predatory, Pare chose to turtle instead of answering for his questionable but. Pare wasn’t jumped or blindsided, he was given ample time to engage.Of course this was a predatory attack.